Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Buy
57
KBAGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.85
Seasonality move
:
9.81%
Day range:
$11.85 - $11.85
52-week range:
$3.90 - $11.85
Dividend yield:
2.38%
P/E ratio:
13.10x
P/S ratio:
0.41x
P/B ratio:
3.07x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
17
1-year change:
203.85%
Market cap:
$3.1B
Revenue:
$7.9B
EPS (TTM):
$0.90
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KBAGF
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ARCAY
Arcadis NV
|
$1.1B | -- | -0.53% | -- | -- |
|
EADSY
Airbus SE
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FER
Ferrovial SE
|
$3B | -- | 13.67% | -- | $71.32 |
|
RANJY
Randstad NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WTKWY
Wolters Kluwer NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KBAGF
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV
|
$11.85 | -- | $3.1B | 13.10x | $0.28 | 2.38% | 0.41x |
|
ARCAY
Arcadis NV
|
$43.97 | -- | $3.7B | 16.70x | $1.13 | 2.58% | 0.71x |
|
EADSY
Airbus SE
|
$55.15 | -- | $174.1B | 29.19x | $0.85 | 1.03% | 2.09x |
|
FER
Ferrovial SE
|
$74.07 | $71.32 | $52.9B | 12.80x | $0.09 | 1.36% | 5.26x |
|
RANJY
Randstad NV
|
$16.53 | -- | $5.8B | 17.69x | $0.88 | 5.3% | 0.22x |
|
WTKWY
Wolters Kluwer NV
|
$77.86 | -- | $17.9B | 12.16x | $1.10 | 3.62% | 2.65x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KBAGF
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV
|
6.95% | 1.520 | -- | 0.65x |
|
ARCAY
Arcadis NV
|
51.39% | 1.143 | -- | 1.16x |
|
EADSY
Airbus SE
|
35.31% | 1.017 | 9.15% | 0.39x |
|
FER
Ferrovial SE
|
75.66% | 0.181 | -- | 0.85x |
|
RANJY
Randstad NV
|
32.31% | 0.016 | 32.14% | 0.96x |
|
WTKWY
Wolters Kluwer NV
|
84.94% | -0.103 | -- | 0.69x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KBAGF
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV
|
-- | -- | 8.37% | 8.94% | -- | -- |
|
ARCAY
Arcadis NV
|
-- | $119.9M | 11.05% | 20.81% | 11.33% | -- |
|
EADSY
Airbus SE
|
$4.4B | $2.4B | 13.61% | 21.82% | 7.91% | $6.2B |
|
FER
Ferrovial SE
|
-- | $250.9M | -- | -- | 9.76% | $156.1M |
|
RANJY
Randstad NV
|
$1.2B | $189.7M | 4.95% | 7.61% | 2.8% | $334.9M |
|
WTKWY
Wolters Kluwer NV
|
-- | -- | 20.71% | 86.21% | -- | -- |
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KBAGF or ARCAY?
Arcadis NV has a net margin of -- compared to Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net margin of --. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's return on equity of 8.94% beat Arcadis NV's return on equity of 20.81%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV-- -- $1B ARCAYArcadis NV-- -- $2.6B -
What do Analysts Say About KBAGF or ARCAY?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Arcadis NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has higher upside potential than Arcadis NV, analysts believe Koninklijke BAM Groep NV is more attractive than Arcadis NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV0 0 0 ARCAYArcadis NV0 0 0 -
Is KBAGF or ARCAY More Risky?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a beta of 0.347, which suggesting that the stock is 65.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arcadis NV has a beta of 0.463, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.741%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBAGF or ARCAY?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Arcadis NV offers a yield of 2.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV pays 81.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Arcadis NV pays out 32.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBAGF or ARCAY?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Arcadis NV quarterly revenues of $1B. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net income of -- is lower than Arcadis NV's net income of --. Notably, Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while Arcadis NV's PE ratio is 16.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koninklijke BAM Groep NV is 0.41x versus 0.71x for Arcadis NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV0.41x 13.10x -- -- ARCAYArcadis NV0.71x 16.70x $1B --
-
Which has Higher Returns KBAGF or EADSY?
Airbus SE has a net margin of -- compared to Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net margin of 9.36%. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's return on equity of 8.94% beat Airbus SE's return on equity of 21.82%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV-- -- $1B EADSYAirbus SE14.59% $0.95 $47.5B -
What do Analysts Say About KBAGF or EADSY?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Airbus SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe Koninklijke BAM Groep NV is more attractive than Airbus SE.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV0 0 0 EADSYAirbus SE0 0 0 -
Is KBAGF or EADSY More Risky?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a beta of 0.347, which suggesting that the stock is 65.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Airbus SE has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.242%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBAGF or EADSY?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Airbus SE offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV pays 81.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE pays out 28.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBAGF or EADSY?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Airbus SE quarterly revenues of $30.2B. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net income of -- is lower than Airbus SE's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while Airbus SE's PE ratio is 29.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koninklijke BAM Groep NV is 0.41x versus 2.09x for Airbus SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV0.41x 13.10x -- -- EADSYAirbus SE2.09x 29.19x $30.2B $2.8B
-
Which has Higher Returns KBAGF or FER?
Ferrovial SE has a net margin of -- compared to Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net margin of --. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's return on equity of 8.94% beat Ferrovial SE's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV-- -- $1B FERFerrovial SE-- -- $18.7B -
What do Analysts Say About KBAGF or FER?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferrovial SE has an analysts' consensus of $71.32 which suggests that it could fall by -4.46%. Given that Ferrovial SE has higher upside potential than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV, analysts believe Ferrovial SE is more attractive than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV0 0 0 FERFerrovial SE2 1 0 -
Is KBAGF or FER More Risky?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a beta of 0.347, which suggesting that the stock is 65.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferrovial SE has a beta of -2.282, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 328.186%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBAGF or FER?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Ferrovial SE offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV pays 81.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE pays out 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBAGF or FER?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ferrovial SE quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net income of -- is lower than Ferrovial SE's net income of --. Notably, Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while Ferrovial SE's PE ratio is 12.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koninklijke BAM Groep NV is 0.41x versus 5.26x for Ferrovial SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV0.41x 13.10x -- -- FERFerrovial SE5.26x 12.80x $2.6B --
-
Which has Higher Returns KBAGF or RANJY?
Randstad NV has a net margin of -- compared to Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net margin of 1.55%. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's return on equity of 8.94% beat Randstad NV's return on equity of 7.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV-- -- $1B RANJYRandstad NV17.88% $0.29 $6.9B -
What do Analysts Say About KBAGF or RANJY?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Randstad NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has higher upside potential than Randstad NV, analysts believe Koninklijke BAM Groep NV is more attractive than Randstad NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV0 0 0 RANJYRandstad NV0 0 0 -
Is KBAGF or RANJY More Risky?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a beta of 0.347, which suggesting that the stock is 65.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Randstad NV has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.733%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBAGF or RANJY?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Randstad NV offers a yield of 5.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV pays 81.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Randstad NV pays out 196.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBAGF or RANJY?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Randstad NV quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net income of -- is lower than Randstad NV's net income of $104.8M. Notably, Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while Randstad NV's PE ratio is 17.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koninklijke BAM Groep NV is 0.41x versus 0.22x for Randstad NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV0.41x 13.10x -- -- RANJYRandstad NV0.22x 17.69x $6.8B $104.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns KBAGF or WTKWY?
Wolters Kluwer NV has a net margin of -- compared to Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net margin of --. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's return on equity of 8.94% beat Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 86.21%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV-- -- $1B WTKWYWolters Kluwer NV-- -- $6.9B -
What do Analysts Say About KBAGF or WTKWY?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wolters Kluwer NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has higher upside potential than Wolters Kluwer NV, analysts believe Koninklijke BAM Groep NV is more attractive than Wolters Kluwer NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV0 0 0 WTKWYWolters Kluwer NV0 0 0 -
Is KBAGF or WTKWY More Risky?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a beta of 0.347, which suggesting that the stock is 65.258% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.703%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBAGF or WTKWY?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Wolters Kluwer NV offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV pays 81.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV pays out 45.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBAGF or WTKWY?
Koninklijke BAM Groep NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues of --. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net income of -- is lower than Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of --. Notably, Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.10x while Wolters Kluwer NV's PE ratio is 12.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Koninklijke BAM Groep NV is 0.41x versus 2.65x for Wolters Kluwer NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBAGFKoninklijke BAM Groep NV0.41x 13.10x -- -- WTKWYWolters Kluwer NV2.65x 12.16x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
37
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Buy
59
SEZL alert for Feb 27
Sezzle, Inc. [SEZL] is down 13.92% over the past day.
Buy
83
GCT alert for Feb 28
GigaCloud Technology, Inc. [GCT] is down 5.87% over the past day.
Buy
62
LMAT alert for Feb 27
LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. [LMAT] is down 4.76% over the past day.
