FER Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Airbus SE has a net margin of -- compared to Ferrovial SE's net margin of 9.36%. Ferrovial SE's return on equity of -- beat Airbus SE's return on equity of 21.82%.

Ferrovial SE has a consensus price target of $71.32, signalling downside risk potential of -0.33%. On the other hand Airbus SE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferrovial SE has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe Ferrovial SE is more attractive than Airbus SE.

Ferrovial SE has a beta of -2.282, which suggesting that the stock is 328.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Airbus SE has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.242%.

Ferrovial SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Airbus SE offers a yield of 1.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Ferrovial SE pays 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE pays out 28.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrovial SE quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Airbus SE quarterly revenues of $30.2B. Ferrovial SE's net income of -- is lower than Airbus SE's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Ferrovial SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Airbus SE's PE ratio is 29.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrovial SE is 5.08x versus 2.08x for Airbus SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a net margin of -- compared to Ferrovial SE's net margin of --. Ferrovial SE's return on equity of -- beat Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's return on equity of 8.94%.

Ferrovial SE has a consensus price target of $71.32, signalling downside risk potential of -0.33%. On the other hand Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferrovial SE has higher upside potential than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV, analysts believe Ferrovial SE is more attractive than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV.

Ferrovial SE has a beta of -2.282, which suggesting that the stock is 328.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a beta of 0.347, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.258%.

Ferrovial SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Ferrovial SE pays 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV pays out 81.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrovial SE quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV quarterly revenues of --. Ferrovial SE's net income of -- is lower than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net income of --. Notably, Ferrovial SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's PE ratio is 13.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrovial SE is 5.08x versus 0.41x for Koninklijke BAM Groep NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Randstad NV has a net margin of -- compared to Ferrovial SE's net margin of 1.55%. Ferrovial SE's return on equity of -- beat Randstad NV's return on equity of 7.61%.

Ferrovial SE has a consensus price target of $71.32, signalling downside risk potential of -0.33%. On the other hand Randstad NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferrovial SE has higher upside potential than Randstad NV, analysts believe Ferrovial SE is more attractive than Randstad NV.

Ferrovial SE has a beta of -2.282, which suggesting that the stock is 328.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Randstad NV has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.733%.

Ferrovial SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Randstad NV offers a yield of 5.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Ferrovial SE pays 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Randstad NV pays out 196.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.

Ferrovial SE quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Randstad NV quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Ferrovial SE's net income of -- is lower than Randstad NV's net income of $104.8M. Notably, Ferrovial SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Randstad NV's PE ratio is 17.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrovial SE is 5.08x versus 0.22x for Randstad NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a net margin of -- compared to Ferrovial SE's net margin of --. Ferrovial SE's return on equity of -- beat Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 86.21%.

Ferrovial SE has a consensus price target of $71.32, signalling downside risk potential of -0.33%. On the other hand Wolters Kluwer NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferrovial SE has higher upside potential than Wolters Kluwer NV, analysts believe Ferrovial SE is more attractive than Wolters Kluwer NV.

Ferrovial SE has a beta of -2.282, which suggesting that the stock is 328.186% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.703%.

Ferrovial SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.4%. Wolters Kluwer NV offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Ferrovial SE pays 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV pays out 45.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ferrovial SE quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues of --. Ferrovial SE's net income of -- is lower than Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of --. Notably, Ferrovial SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.80x while Wolters Kluwer NV's PE ratio is 20.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferrovial SE is 5.08x versus 2.61x for Wolters Kluwer NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.