ARCAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ferrovial SE has a net margin of -- compared to Arcadis NV's net margin of --. Arcadis NV's return on equity of 20.81% beat Ferrovial SE's return on equity of --.

Arcadis NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferrovial SE has an analysts' consensus of $71.32 which suggests that it could fall by -1.98%. Given that Ferrovial SE has higher upside potential than Arcadis NV, analysts believe Ferrovial SE is more attractive than Arcadis NV.

Arcadis NV has a beta of 0.463, which suggesting that the stock is 53.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferrovial SE has a beta of -2.282, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 328.186%.

Arcadis NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.4%. Ferrovial SE offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Arcadis NV pays 32.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE pays out 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcadis NV quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Ferrovial SE quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Arcadis NV's net income of -- is lower than Ferrovial SE's net income of --. Notably, Arcadis NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Ferrovial SE's PE ratio is 12.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadis NV is 0.76x versus 5.17x for Ferrovial SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a net margin of -- compared to Arcadis NV's net margin of --. Arcadis NV's return on equity of 20.81% beat Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's return on equity of 8.94%.

Arcadis NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arcadis NV has higher upside potential than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV, analysts believe Arcadis NV is more attractive than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV.

Arcadis NV has a beta of 0.463, which suggesting that the stock is 53.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Koninklijke BAM Groep NV has a beta of 0.347, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.258%.

Arcadis NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.4%. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Arcadis NV pays 32.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Koninklijke BAM Groep NV pays out 81.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcadis NV quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV quarterly revenues of --. Arcadis NV's net income of -- is lower than Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's net income of --. Notably, Arcadis NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's PE ratio is 13.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadis NV is 0.76x versus 0.41x for Koninklijke BAM Groep NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Randstad NV has a net margin of -- compared to Arcadis NV's net margin of 1.55%. Arcadis NV's return on equity of 20.81% beat Randstad NV's return on equity of 7.61%.

Arcadis NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Randstad NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arcadis NV has higher upside potential than Randstad NV, analysts believe Arcadis NV is more attractive than Randstad NV.

Arcadis NV has a beta of 0.463, which suggesting that the stock is 53.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Randstad NV has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.733%.

Arcadis NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.4%. Randstad NV offers a yield of 5.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Arcadis NV pays 32.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Randstad NV pays out 196.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Arcadis NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.

Arcadis NV quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Randstad NV quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Arcadis NV's net income of -- is lower than Randstad NV's net income of $104.8M. Notably, Arcadis NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Randstad NV's PE ratio is 17.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadis NV is 0.76x versus 0.22x for Randstad NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a net margin of -- compared to Arcadis NV's net margin of --. Arcadis NV's return on equity of 20.81% beat Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 86.21%.

Arcadis NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wolters Kluwer NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arcadis NV has higher upside potential than Wolters Kluwer NV, analysts believe Arcadis NV is more attractive than Wolters Kluwer NV.

Arcadis NV has a beta of 0.463, which suggesting that the stock is 53.741% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.703%.

Arcadis NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.4%. Wolters Kluwer NV offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Arcadis NV pays 32.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV pays out 45.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Arcadis NV quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues of --. Arcadis NV's net income of -- is lower than Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of --. Notably, Arcadis NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.92x while Wolters Kluwer NV's PE ratio is 20.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadis NV is 0.76x versus 2.61x for Wolters Kluwer NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.