EADSY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ferrovial SE has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Airbus SE's net margin of --. Airbus SE's return on equity of 22.44% beat Ferrovial SE's return on equity of --.

Airbus SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferrovial SE has an analysts' consensus of $71.01 which suggests that it could grow by 9.27%. Given that Ferrovial SE has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe Ferrovial SE is more attractive than Airbus SE.

Airbus SE has a beta of 1.068, which suggesting that the stock is 6.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferrovial SE has a beta of -2.255, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 325.498%.

Airbus SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Ferrovial SE offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Airbus SE pays 28.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE pays out 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Airbus SE quarterly revenues are $20.8B, which are larger than Ferrovial SE quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Airbus SE's net income of $1.3B is higher than Ferrovial SE's net income of --. Notably, Airbus SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.85x while Ferrovial SE's PE ratio is 12.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbus SE is 2.29x versus 4.61x for Ferrovial SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICTS International NV has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Airbus SE's net margin of --. Airbus SE's return on equity of 22.44% beat ICTS International NV's return on equity of 5.54%.

Airbus SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ICTS International NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Airbus SE has higher upside potential than ICTS International NV, analysts believe Airbus SE is more attractive than ICTS International NV.

Airbus SE has a beta of 1.068, which suggesting that the stock is 6.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICTS International NV has a beta of 0.731, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.895%.

Airbus SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. ICTS International NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Airbus SE pays 28.4% of its earnings as a dividend. ICTS International NV pays out 83.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Airbus SE quarterly revenues are $20.8B, which are larger than ICTS International NV quarterly revenues of --. Airbus SE's net income of $1.3B is higher than ICTS International NV's net income of --. Notably, Airbus SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.85x while ICTS International NV's PE ratio is 43.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbus SE is 2.29x versus 0.25x for ICTS International NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Randstad NV has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Airbus SE's net margin of 1.43%. Airbus SE's return on equity of 22.44% beat Randstad NV's return on equity of 1.68%.

Airbus SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Randstad NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Airbus SE has higher upside potential than Randstad NV, analysts believe Airbus SE is more attractive than Randstad NV.

Airbus SE has a beta of 1.068, which suggesting that the stock is 6.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Randstad NV has a beta of 0.875, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.505%.

Airbus SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Randstad NV offers a yield of 4.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.88 per share. Airbus SE pays 28.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Randstad NV pays out 196.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Randstad NV's is not.

Airbus SE quarterly revenues are $20.8B, which are larger than Randstad NV quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Airbus SE's net income of $1.3B is higher than Randstad NV's net income of $97M. Notably, Airbus SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.85x while Randstad NV's PE ratio is 99.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbus SE is 2.29x versus 0.25x for Randstad NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a net margin of 6.09% compared to Airbus SE's net margin of --. Airbus SE's return on equity of 22.44% beat Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 86.21%.

Airbus SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wolters Kluwer NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Airbus SE has higher upside potential than Wolters Kluwer NV, analysts believe Airbus SE is more attractive than Wolters Kluwer NV.

Airbus SE has a beta of 1.068, which suggesting that the stock is 6.803% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.666, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.42%.

Airbus SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Wolters Kluwer NV offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Airbus SE pays 28.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV pays out 45.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Airbus SE quarterly revenues are $20.8B, which are larger than Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues of --. Airbus SE's net income of $1.3B is higher than Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of --. Notably, Airbus SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.85x while Wolters Kluwer NV's PE ratio is 20.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbus SE is 2.29x versus 3.71x for Wolters Kluwer NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.