EADSY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ferrovial SE has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Airbus SE's net margin of --. Airbus SE's return on equity of 21.82% beat Ferrovial SE's return on equity of --.

Airbus SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ferrovial SE has an analysts' consensus of $71.32 which suggests that it could fall by -4.46%. Given that Ferrovial SE has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe Ferrovial SE is more attractive than Airbus SE.

Airbus SE has a beta of 1.052, which suggesting that the stock is 5.242% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferrovial SE has a beta of -2.282, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 328.186%.

Airbus SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Ferrovial SE offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Airbus SE pays 28.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferrovial SE pays out 14.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Airbus SE quarterly revenues are $30.2B, which are larger than Ferrovial SE quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Airbus SE's net income of $2.8B is higher than Ferrovial SE's net income of --. Notably, Airbus SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.19x while Ferrovial SE's PE ratio is 12.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbus SE is 2.09x versus 5.26x for Ferrovial SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Airbus SE's net margin of 19.35%. Airbus SE's return on equity of 21.82% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 44.62%.

Airbus SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $361.11 which suggests that it could grow by 5.95%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than Airbus SE.

Airbus SE has a beta of 1.052, which suggesting that the stock is 5.242% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.407, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.683%.

Airbus SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Airbus SE pays 28.4% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 17.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Airbus SE quarterly revenues are $30.2B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Airbus SE's net income of $2.8B is higher than GE Aerospace's net income of $2.5B. Notably, Airbus SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.19x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 41.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbus SE is 2.09x versus 7.94x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX Corp. has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Airbus SE's net margin of 7.07%. Airbus SE's return on equity of 21.82% beat RTX Corp.'s return on equity of 10.94%.

Airbus SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RTX Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $216.92 which suggests that it could grow by 9.76%. Given that RTX Corp. has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe RTX Corp. is more attractive than Airbus SE.

Airbus SE has a beta of 1.052, which suggesting that the stock is 5.242% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX Corp. has a beta of 0.428, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.172%.

Airbus SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. RTX Corp. offers a yield of 1.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Airbus SE pays 28.4% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX Corp. pays out 53.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Airbus SE quarterly revenues are $30.2B, which are larger than RTX Corp. quarterly revenues of $24.2B. Airbus SE's net income of $2.8B is higher than RTX Corp.'s net income of $1.7B. Notably, Airbus SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.19x while RTX Corp.'s PE ratio is 39.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbus SE is 2.09x versus 3.03x for RTX Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolters Kluwer NV has a net margin of 9.36% compared to Airbus SE's net margin of --. Airbus SE's return on equity of 21.82% beat Wolters Kluwer NV's return on equity of 86.21%.

Airbus SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Wolters Kluwer NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Airbus SE has higher upside potential than Wolters Kluwer NV, analysts believe Airbus SE is more attractive than Wolters Kluwer NV.

Airbus SE has a beta of 1.052, which suggesting that the stock is 5.242% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolters Kluwer NV has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.703%.

Airbus SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.03%. Wolters Kluwer NV offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.10 per share. Airbus SE pays 28.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolters Kluwer NV pays out 45.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Airbus SE quarterly revenues are $30.2B, which are larger than Wolters Kluwer NV quarterly revenues of --. Airbus SE's net income of $2.8B is higher than Wolters Kluwer NV's net income of --. Notably, Airbus SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.19x while Wolters Kluwer NV's PE ratio is 12.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbus SE is 2.09x versus 2.65x for Wolters Kluwer NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.