PRGLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jollibee Foods Corp. has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net margin of 4.06%. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.12% beat Jollibee Foods Corp.'s return on equity of 14.25%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jollibee Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Puregold Price Club, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jollibee Foods Corp., analysts believe Puregold Price Club, Inc. is more attractive than Jollibee Foods Corp..

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a beta of 0.001, which suggesting that the stock is 99.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jollibee Foods Corp. has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.543%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.75%. Jollibee Foods Corp. offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Puregold Price Club, Inc. pays 27.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Jollibee Foods Corp. pays out 19.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Jollibee Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net income of $35M is lower than Jollibee Foods Corp.'s net income of $54.3M. Notably, Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while Jollibee Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puregold Price Club, Inc. is 0.42x versus 0.68x for Jollibee Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net margin of 2.01%. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.12% beat Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.13%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Puregold Price Club, Inc. has higher upside potential than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Puregold Price Club, Inc. is more attractive than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc..

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a beta of 0.001, which suggesting that the stock is 99.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.662%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.75%. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 6.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Puregold Price Club, Inc. pays 27.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. pays out 15.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $889.6M. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net income of $35M is higher than Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $17.9M. Notably, Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puregold Price Club, Inc. is 0.42x versus 0.19x for Robinsons Retail Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Investments Corp. has a net margin of 3.43% compared to Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net margin of 20.14%. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.12% beat SM Investments Corp.'s return on equity of 13.44%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SM Investments Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Puregold Price Club, Inc. has higher upside potential than SM Investments Corp., analysts believe Puregold Price Club, Inc. is more attractive than SM Investments Corp..

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a beta of 0.001, which suggesting that the stock is 99.939% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Investments Corp. has a beta of 0.105, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.451%.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.75%. SM Investments Corp. offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Puregold Price Club, Inc. pays 27.69% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Investments Corp. pays out 16.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Puregold Price Club, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than SM Investments Corp. quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s net income of $35M is lower than SM Investments Corp.'s net income of $525.4M. Notably, Puregold Price Club, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.13x while SM Investments Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Puregold Price Club, Inc. is 0.42x versus 1.33x for SM Investments Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.