PKIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a net margin of 2.3% compared to Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s net margin of 11.24%. Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s return on equity of -0.88% beat Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.8%.

Pekin Life Insurance Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Abacus Global Management, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 59.39%. Given that Abacus Global Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pekin Life Insurance Co., analysts believe Abacus Global Management, Inc. is more attractive than Pekin Life Insurance Co..

Pekin Life Insurance Co. has a beta of -0.787, which suggesting that the stock is 178.654% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a beta of -0.062, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.246%.

Pekin Life Insurance Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abacus Global Management, Inc. offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Pekin Life Insurance Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pekin Life Insurance Co. quarterly revenues are $64.5M, which are larger than Abacus Global Management, Inc. quarterly revenues of $63M. Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s net income of $1.5M is lower than Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M. Notably, Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s PE ratio is 108.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pekin Life Insurance Co. is 0.77x versus 3.99x for Abacus Global Management, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 2.3% compared to Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s net margin of 26.49%. Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s return on equity of -0.88% beat Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.31%.

Pekin Life Insurance Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.93%. Given that Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pekin Life Insurance Co., analysts believe Brighthouse Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Pekin Life Insurance Co..

Pekin Life Insurance Co. has a beta of -0.787, which suggesting that the stock is 178.654% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.337%.

Pekin Life Insurance Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pekin Life Insurance Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pekin Life Insurance Co. quarterly revenues are $64.5M, which are smaller than Brighthouse Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s net income of $1.5M is lower than Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net income of $481M. Notably, Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pekin Life Insurance Co. is 0.77x versus 0.60x for Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a net margin of 2.3% compared to Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s net margin of 3.85%. Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s return on equity of -0.88% beat Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99%.

Pekin Life Insurance Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.5%. Given that Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has higher upside potential than Pekin Life Insurance Co., analysts believe Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is more attractive than Pekin Life Insurance Co..

Pekin Life Insurance Co. has a beta of -0.787, which suggesting that the stock is 178.654% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.364, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.618%.

Pekin Life Insurance Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pekin Life Insurance Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pekin Life Insurance Co. quarterly revenues are $64.5M, which are larger than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues of $62.8M. Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s net income of $1.5M is lower than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M. Notably, Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s PE ratio is 24.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pekin Life Insurance Co. is 0.77x versus 1.07x for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 2.3% compared to Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s net margin of 8.47%. Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s return on equity of -0.88% beat Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86%.

Pekin Life Insurance Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Genworth Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.25%. Given that Genworth Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pekin Life Insurance Co., analysts believe Genworth Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Pekin Life Insurance Co..

Pekin Life Insurance Co. has a beta of -0.787, which suggesting that the stock is 178.654% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.829%.

Pekin Life Insurance Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genworth Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pekin Life Insurance Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pekin Life Insurance Co. quarterly revenues are $64.5M, which are smaller than Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s net income of $1.5M is lower than Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M. Notably, Pekin Life Insurance Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Genworth Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pekin Life Insurance Co. is 0.77x versus 0.54x for Genworth Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.