CIA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a net margin of 3.85% compared to Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net margin of 11.24%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99% beat Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.8%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.28%. On the other hand Abacus Global Management, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 58.82%. Given that Abacus Global Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas), analysts believe Abacus Global Management, Inc. is more attractive than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas).

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.618% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a beta of -0.062, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.246%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abacus Global Management, Inc. offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues are $62.8M, which are smaller than Abacus Global Management, Inc. quarterly revenues of $63M. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M is lower than Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M. Notably, Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.15x while Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s PE ratio is 108.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is 1.06x versus 4.01x for Abacus Global Management, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 3.85% compared to Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net margin of 26.49%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99% beat Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.31%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.28%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could grow by 1%. Given that Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, Inc., analysts believe Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial, Inc..

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.618% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.337%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues are $62.8M, which are smaller than Brighthouse Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M is lower than Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net income of $481M. Notably, Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.15x while Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is 1.06x versus 0.60x for Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 3.85% compared to Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net margin of 8.47%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99% beat Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.28%. On the other hand Genworth Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.41%. Given that Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, Inc., analysts believe Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is more attractive than Genworth Financial, Inc..

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.618% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.829%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genworth Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues are $62.8M, which are smaller than Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M is lower than Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M. Notably, Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.15x while Genworth Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is 1.06x versus 0.55x for Genworth Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National Corp. has a net margin of 3.85% compared to Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net margin of 9.09%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99% beat Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.28%. On the other hand Lincoln National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $46.33 which suggests that it could grow by 1.3%. Given that Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.364, which suggesting that the stock is 63.618% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.865%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National Corp. offers a yield of 3.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp. pays out 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues are $62.8M, which are smaller than Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M is lower than Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M. Notably, Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.15x while Lincoln National Corp.'s PE ratio is 4.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is 1.06x versus 0.42x for Lincoln National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.