CIA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. has a net margin of 3.85% compared to Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net margin of 7.37%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99% beat F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 5.9%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.63%. On the other hand F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $29.50 which suggests that it could grow by 25.59%. Given that F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas), analysts believe F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is more attractive than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas).

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.425, which suggesting that the stock is 57.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. pays out 48.44% of its earnings as a dividend. F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues are $62.8M, which are smaller than F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M is lower than F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.'s net income of $130M. Notably, Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.09x while F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is 1.19x versus 0.59x for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 3.85% compared to Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net margin of 8.47%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99% beat Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.63%. On the other hand Genworth Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.9%. Given that Genworth Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas), analysts believe Genworth Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas).

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.425, which suggesting that the stock is 57.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.21%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genworth Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues are $62.8M, which are smaller than Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M is lower than Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M. Notably, Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.09x while Genworth Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is 1.19x versus 0.52x for Genworth Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National Corp. has a net margin of 3.85% compared to Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net margin of 14.06%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99% beat Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 12.41%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.63%. On the other hand Lincoln National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $46.25 which suggests that it could grow by 15.92%. Given that Lincoln National Corp. has higher upside potential than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas), analysts believe Lincoln National Corp. is more attractive than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas).

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.425, which suggesting that the stock is 57.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.914%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National Corp. offers a yield of 4.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp. pays out 30.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues are $62.8M, which are smaller than Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M is lower than Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $754M. Notably, Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.09x while Lincoln National Corp.'s PE ratio is 7.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is 1.19x versus 0.39x for Lincoln National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica, Inc. has a net margin of 3.85% compared to Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net margin of 23.5%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99% beat Primerica, Inc.'s return on equity of 32.38%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.63%. On the other hand Primerica, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $290.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.85%. Given that Primerica, Inc. has higher upside potential than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas), analysts believe Primerica, Inc. is more attractive than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas).

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.425, which suggesting that the stock is 57.494% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica, Inc. has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.774%.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Primerica, Inc. offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica, Inc. pays out 18.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues are $62.8M, which are smaller than Primerica, Inc. quarterly revenues of $838.3M. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M is lower than Primerica, Inc.'s net income of $197M. Notably, Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.09x while Primerica, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is 1.19x versus 2.57x for Primerica, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.