GNW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a net margin of 8.47% compared to Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 11.24%. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86% beat Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.8%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.23%. On the other hand Abacus Global Management, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 54.21%. Given that Abacus Global Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, Inc., analysts believe Abacus Global Management, Inc. is more attractive than Genworth Financial, Inc..

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a beta of -0.062, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.246%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abacus Global Management, Inc. offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Abacus Global Management, Inc. quarterly revenues of $63M. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M is higher than Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M. Notably, Genworth Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.49x while Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s PE ratio is 107.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial, Inc. is 0.55x versus 3.97x for Abacus Global Management, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 8.47% compared to Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 26.49%. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86% beat Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.31%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.23%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could grow by 0.99%. Given that Genworth Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, Inc., analysts believe Genworth Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial, Inc..

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.337%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M is lower than Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net income of $481M. Notably, Genworth Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.49x while Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial, Inc. is 0.55x versus 0.60x for Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a net margin of 8.47% compared to Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 3.85%. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86% beat Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.23%. On the other hand Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.49%. Given that Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, Inc., analysts believe Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) is more attractive than Genworth Financial, Inc..

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.364, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.618%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues of $62.8M. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M is higher than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M. Notably, Genworth Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.49x while Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s PE ratio is 23.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial, Inc. is 0.55x versus 1.04x for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National Corp. has a net margin of 8.47% compared to Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 9.09%. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86% beat Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.23%. On the other hand Lincoln National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $45.83 which suggests that it could fall by -0.67%. Given that Genworth Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe Genworth Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.865%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National Corp. offers a yield of 3.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp. pays out 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M is lower than Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M. Notably, Genworth Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.49x while Lincoln National Corp.'s PE ratio is 4.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial, Inc. is 0.55x versus 0.42x for Lincoln National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.