GNW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a net margin of 8.47% compared to Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 11.24%. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86% beat Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.8%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.21%. On the other hand Abacus Global Management, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.10 which suggests that it could grow by 88.76%. Given that Abacus Global Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, Inc., analysts believe Abacus Global Management, Inc. is more attractive than Genworth Financial, Inc..

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a beta of -0.062, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.246%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abacus Global Management, Inc. offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Abacus Global Management, Inc. quarterly revenues of $63M. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M is higher than Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M. Notably, Genworth Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s PE ratio is 88.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial, Inc. is 0.52x versus 3.27x for Abacus Global Management, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 8.47% compared to Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 52.5%. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86% beat Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.21%. On the other hand Enact Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $40.60 which suggests that it could grow by 7.07%. Given that Genworth Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enact Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Genworth Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Enact Holdings, Inc..

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enact Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays out 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $311.5M. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M is lower than Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M. Notably, Genworth Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Enact Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial, Inc. is 0.52x versus 4.69x for Enact Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 8.47% compared to Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 26.49%. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86% beat Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.31%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.21%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could fall by -0.03%. Given that Genworth Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, Inc., analysts believe Genworth Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial, Inc..

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.337%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M is lower than Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net income of $481M. Notably, Genworth Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial, Inc. is 0.52x versus 0.61x for Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a net margin of 8.47% compared to Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 3.85%. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86% beat Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 15.21%. On the other hand Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could fall by -5.66%. Given that Genworth Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas), analysts believe Genworth Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas).

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, which suggesting that the stock is 1.829% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.364, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.618%.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues of $62.8M. Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M is higher than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M. Notably, Genworth Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s PE ratio is 24.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Genworth Financial, Inc. is 0.52x versus 1.09x for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.