ACT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity Co. has a net margin of 52.5% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 17.13%. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84% beat Erie Indemnity Co.'s return on equity of 30.87%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.07%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enact Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity Co., analysts believe Enact Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Erie Indemnity Co..

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity Co. has a beta of 0.396, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.396%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Erie Indemnity Co. offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity Co. pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity Co. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is lower than Erie Indemnity Co.'s net income of $182.9M. Notably, Enact Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.71x while Erie Indemnity Co.'s PE ratio is 24.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings, Inc. is 4.69x versus 3.91x for Erie Indemnity Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 52.5% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.47%. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84% beat Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.07%. On the other hand Genworth Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.21%. Given that Genworth Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enact Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Genworth Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Enact Holdings, Inc..

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.829%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Genworth Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are smaller than Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is higher than Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M. Notably, Enact Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.71x while Genworth Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings, Inc. is 4.69x versus 0.52x for Genworth Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root, Inc. has a net margin of 52.5% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -1.39%. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84% beat Root, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.96%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.07%. On the other hand Root, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $126.75 which suggests that it could grow by 63.51%. Given that Root, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enact Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Root, Inc. is more attractive than Enact Holdings, Inc..

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root, Inc. has a beta of 2.639, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.898%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Root, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Root, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are smaller than Root, Inc. quarterly revenues of $387.8M. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is higher than Root, Inc.'s net income of -$5.4M. Notably, Enact Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.71x while Root, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings, Inc. is 4.69x versus 0.89x for Root, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion, Inc. has a net margin of 52.5% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.6%. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84% beat Trupanion, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.54%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.07%. On the other hand Trupanion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.75 which suggests that it could grow by 51.08%. Given that Trupanion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enact Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Trupanion, Inc. is more attractive than Enact Holdings, Inc..

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion, Inc. has a beta of 1.624, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.431%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.15%. Trupanion, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are smaller than Trupanion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9M. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is higher than Trupanion, Inc.'s net income of $5.9M. Notably, Enact Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.71x while Trupanion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 101.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings, Inc. is 4.69x versus 1.11x for Trupanion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.