ACT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity Co. has a net margin of 52.5% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 17.13%. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84% beat Erie Indemnity Co.'s return on equity of 30.87%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.69%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enact Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity Co., analysts believe Enact Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Erie Indemnity Co..

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity Co. has a beta of 0.335, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.518%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Erie Indemnity Co. offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity Co. pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity Co. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is lower than Erie Indemnity Co.'s net income of $182.9M. Notably, Enact Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.66x while Erie Indemnity Co.'s PE ratio is 23.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings, Inc. is 4.67x versus 3.74x for Erie Indemnity Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 52.5% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 8.47%. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84% beat Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.69%. On the other hand Genworth Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 17.23%. Given that Genworth Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enact Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Genworth Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Enact Holdings, Inc..

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.189%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Genworth Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are smaller than Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is higher than Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M. Notably, Enact Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.66x while Genworth Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings, Inc. is 4.67x versus 0.51x for Genworth Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MGIC Investment Corp. has a net margin of 52.5% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 62.76%. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84% beat MGIC Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 14.53%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.69%. On the other hand MGIC Investment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $27.67 which suggests that it could fall by -1.93%. Given that Enact Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than MGIC Investment Corp., analysts believe Enact Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than MGIC Investment Corp..

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MGIC Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.925, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.479%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. MGIC Investment Corp. offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. MGIC Investment Corp. pays out 16.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are larger than MGIC Investment Corp. quarterly revenues of $304.5M. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is lower than MGIC Investment Corp.'s net income of $191.1M. Notably, Enact Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.66x while MGIC Investment Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings, Inc. is 4.67x versus 5.63x for MGIC Investment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion, Inc. has a net margin of 52.5% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.6%. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84% beat Trupanion, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.54%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $40.60, signalling upside risk potential of 7.69%. On the other hand Trupanion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.50 which suggests that it could grow by 47.06%. Given that Trupanion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enact Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Trupanion, Inc. is more attractive than Enact Holdings, Inc..

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion, Inc. has a beta of 1.817, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.729%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.1%. Trupanion, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are smaller than Trupanion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9M. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is higher than Trupanion, Inc.'s net income of $5.9M. Notably, Enact Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.66x while Trupanion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 105.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings, Inc. is 4.67x versus 1.16x for Trupanion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.