ACT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity Co. has a net margin of 52.5% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 17.13%. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84% beat Erie Indemnity Co.'s return on equity of 30.87%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.60, signalling upside risk potential of 2.62%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enact Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity Co., analysts believe Enact Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Erie Indemnity Co..

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity Co. has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.849%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Erie Indemnity Co. offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.46 per share. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity Co. pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity Co. quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is lower than Erie Indemnity Co.'s net income of $182.9M. Notably, Enact Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while Erie Indemnity Co.'s PE ratio is 22.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings, Inc. is 5.02x versus 3.66x for Erie Indemnity Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root, Inc. has a net margin of 52.5% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -1.39%. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84% beat Root, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.96%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.60, signalling upside risk potential of 2.62%. On the other hand Root, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $120.75 which suggests that it could grow by 57.91%. Given that Root, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enact Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Root, Inc. is more attractive than Enact Holdings, Inc..

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root, Inc. has a beta of 2.701, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 170.116%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Root, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Root, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are smaller than Root, Inc. quarterly revenues of $387.8M. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is higher than Root, Inc.'s net income of -$5.4M. Notably, Enact Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while Root, Inc.'s PE ratio is 24.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings, Inc. is 5.02x versus 0.88x for Root, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. has a net margin of 52.5% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 12.01%. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.41%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.60, signalling upside risk potential of 2.62%. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $63.73 which suggests that it could grow by 36.58%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enact Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. is more attractive than Enact Holdings, Inc..

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are smaller than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $382.2M. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is higher than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.'s net income of $45.9M. Notably, Enact Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 13.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings, Inc. is 5.02x versus 1.46x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion, Inc. has a net margin of 52.5% compared to Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.6%. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 12.84% beat Trupanion, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.54%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.60, signalling upside risk potential of 2.62%. On the other hand Trupanion, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $54.75 which suggests that it could grow by 52.25%. Given that Trupanion, Inc. has higher upside potential than Enact Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Trupanion, Inc. is more attractive than Enact Holdings, Inc..

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion, Inc. has a beta of 1.583, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.344%.

Enact Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.01%. Trupanion, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings, Inc. pays 16.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $311.5M, which are smaller than Trupanion, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9M. Enact Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $163.5M is higher than Trupanion, Inc.'s net income of $5.9M. Notably, Enact Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.31x while Trupanion, Inc.'s PE ratio is 100.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings, Inc. is 5.02x versus 1.11x for Trupanion, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.