BHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Globe Life, Inc. has a net margin of 26.49% compared to Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 25.63%. Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.31% beat Globe Life, Inc.'s return on equity of 21.72%.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand Globe Life, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $168.70 which suggests that it could grow by 20.31%. Given that Globe Life, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, Inc., analysts believe Globe Life, Inc. is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial, Inc..

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.966, which suggesting that the stock is 3.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life, Inc. has a beta of 0.468, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.174%.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Globe Life, Inc. offers a yield of 0.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc. pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Globe Life, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net income of $481M is higher than Globe Life, Inc.'s net income of $387.8M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.37x while Globe Life, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. is 0.59x versus 1.97x for Globe Life, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 26.49% compared to Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 8.47%. Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.31% beat Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86%.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand Genworth Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.9%. Given that Genworth Financial, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, Inc., analysts believe Genworth Financial, Inc. is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial, Inc..

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.966, which suggesting that the stock is 3.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.21%.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genworth Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net income of $481M is higher than Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.37x while Genworth Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. is 0.59x versus 0.50x for Genworth Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National Corp. has a net margin of 26.49% compared to Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 9.09%. Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.31% beat Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18%.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand Lincoln National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $46.75 which suggests that it could grow by 12.35%. Given that Lincoln National Corp. has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, Inc., analysts believe Lincoln National Corp. is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial, Inc..

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.966, which suggesting that the stock is 3.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.309, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.914%.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National Corp. offers a yield of 4.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp. pays out 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net income of $481M is higher than Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.37x while Lincoln National Corp.'s PE ratio is 3.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. is 0.59x versus 0.38x for Lincoln National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife, Inc. has a net margin of 26.49% compared to Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net margin of 5.2%. Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.31% beat MetLife, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.43%.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a consensus price target of $65.50, signalling upside risk potential of 2.25%. On the other hand MetLife, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.63%. Given that MetLife, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, Inc., analysts believe MetLife, Inc. is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial, Inc..

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.966, which suggesting that the stock is 3.358% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife, Inc. has a beta of 0.769, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.055%.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MetLife, Inc. offers a yield of 2.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife, Inc. pays out 36.26% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than MetLife, Inc. quarterly revenues of $17.4B. Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net income of $481M is lower than MetLife, Inc.'s net income of $902M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 4.37x while MetLife, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. is 0.59x versus 0.75x for MetLife, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.