Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
72
ABL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.94
Seasonality move
:
15.19%
Day range:
$6.64 - $6.98
52-week range:
$4.60 - $9.61
Dividend yield:
2.88%
P/E ratio:
88.75x
P/S ratio:
3.27x
P/B ratio:
1.56x
Volume:
658.2K
Avg. volume:
807.6K
1-year change:
-12.15%
Market cap:
$678.4M
Revenue:
$114.3M
EPS (TTM):
$0.08
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ABL
Abacus Global Management, Inc.
|
$49.6M | $0.18 | 60.74% | 1533.3% | $13.10 |
|
AAME
Atlantic American Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHF
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
|
$2.3B | $5.03 | 86.91% | -53.3% | $65.50 |
|
CIA
Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)
|
$63.5M | $0.06 | 6.95% | 10.19% | $5.00 |
|
GNW
Genworth Financial, Inc.
|
-- | $0.05 | -- | -74.36% | $10.00 |
|
LNC
Lincoln National Corp.
|
$4.8B | $1.87 | -24.23% | -80.22% | $44.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ABL
Abacus Global Management, Inc.
|
$6.94 | $13.10 | $678.4M | 88.75x | $0.20 | 2.88% | 3.27x |
|
AAME
Atlantic American Corp.
|
$2.45 | -- | $50M | 10.86x | $0.02 | 0.82% | 0.24x |
|
BHF
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
|
$65.52 | $65.50 | $3.7B | 4.47x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.61x |
|
CIA
Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)
|
$5.34 | $5.00 | $268.6M | 24.99x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.09x |
|
GNW
Genworth Financial, Inc.
|
$8.68 | $10.00 | $3.5B | 16.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.52x |
|
LNC
Lincoln National Corp.
|
$41.92 | $44.00 | $8B | 3.76x | $0.45 | 4.29% | 0.38x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ABL
Abacus Global Management, Inc.
|
48.53% | -1.653 | 73.38% | 0.58x |
|
AAME
Atlantic American Corp.
|
28.04% | 1.363 | 72.81% | 0.00x |
|
BHF
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
|
33.15% | 0.686 | 101.82% | 0.00x |
|
CIA
Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)
|
-- | 0.923 | -- | 0.00x |
|
GNW
Genworth Financial, Inc.
|
14.71% | 0.880 | 33.09% | 0.00x |
|
LNC
Lincoln National Corp.
|
35.58% | 1.274 | 66.76% | 0.00x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ABL
Abacus Global Management, Inc.
|
$50.9M | $21.3M | 1.5% | 2.8% | 33.87% | -$32.9M |
|
AAME
Atlantic American Corp.
|
-- | $1.5M | 3.47% | 4.88% | 1.43% | $6.6M |
|
BHF
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
|
-- | $623M | 11.08% | 17.31% | 32.21% | $117M |
|
CIA
Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)
|
-- | $4.5M | 4.95% | 4.99% | 7.13% | $4.6M |
|
GNW
Genworth Financial, Inc.
|
-- | $192M | 3.33% | 3.86% | 8.96% | $87M |
|
LNC
Lincoln National Corp.
|
-- | $603M | 13.99% | 23.18% | 10.7% | -$1.1B |
Abacus Global Management, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ABL or AAME?
Atlantic American Corp. has a net margin of 11.24% compared to Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net margin of 1.07%. Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.8% beat Atlantic American Corp.'s return on equity of 4.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.80.86% $0.07 $854.1M AAMEAtlantic American Corp.-- $0.02 $152.2M -
What do Analysts Say About ABL or AAME?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.10, signalling upside risk potential of 88.76%. On the other hand Atlantic American Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Abacus Global Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Atlantic American Corp., analysts believe Abacus Global Management, Inc. is more attractive than Atlantic American Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.3 0 0 AAMEAtlantic American Corp.0 0 0 -
Is ABL or AAME More Risky?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a beta of -0.062, which suggesting that the stock is 106.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlantic American Corp. has a beta of 0.773, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.652%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABL or AAME?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Atlantic American Corp. offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Abacus Global Management, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atlantic American Corp. pays out 18.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlantic American Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ABL or AAME?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. quarterly revenues are $63M, which are larger than Atlantic American Corp. quarterly revenues of $53.8M. Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M is higher than Atlantic American Corp.'s net income of $577K. Notably, Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.75x while Atlantic American Corp.'s PE ratio is 10.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abacus Global Management, Inc. is 3.27x versus 0.24x for Atlantic American Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.3.27x 88.75x $63M $7.1M AAMEAtlantic American Corp.0.24x 10.86x $53.8M $577K
-
Which has Higher Returns ABL or BHF?
Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 11.24% compared to Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net margin of 26.49%. Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.8% beat Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 17.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.80.86% $0.07 $854.1M BHFBrighthouse Financial, Inc.-- $7.88 $9.6B -
What do Analysts Say About ABL or BHF?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.10, signalling upside risk potential of 88.76%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $65.50 which suggests that it could fall by -0.03%. Given that Abacus Global Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, Inc., analysts believe Abacus Global Management, Inc. is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.3 0 0 BHFBrighthouse Financial, Inc.0 6 0 -
Is ABL or BHF More Risky?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a beta of -0.062, which suggesting that the stock is 106.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial, Inc. has a beta of 0.967, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.337%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABL or BHF?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Abacus Global Management, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ABL or BHF?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. quarterly revenues are $63M, which are smaller than Brighthouse Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M is lower than Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s net income of $481M. Notably, Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.75x while Brighthouse Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abacus Global Management, Inc. is 3.27x versus 0.61x for Brighthouse Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.3.27x 88.75x $63M $7.1M BHFBrighthouse Financial, Inc.0.61x 4.47x $1.8B $481M
-
Which has Higher Returns ABL or CIA?
Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a net margin of 11.24% compared to Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net margin of 3.85%. Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.8% beat Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s return on equity of 4.99%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.80.86% $0.07 $854.1M CIACitizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)-- $0.05 $225.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ABL or CIA?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.10, signalling upside risk potential of 88.76%. On the other hand Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could fall by -6.37%. Given that Abacus Global Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas), analysts believe Abacus Global Management, Inc. is more attractive than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.3 0 0 CIACitizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)0 0 0 -
Is ABL or CIA More Risky?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a beta of -0.062, which suggesting that the stock is 106.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) has a beta of 0.364, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.618%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABL or CIA?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Abacus Global Management, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ABL or CIA?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. quarterly revenues are $63M, which are larger than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas) quarterly revenues of $62.8M. Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M is higher than Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s net income of $2.4M. Notably, Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.75x while Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)'s PE ratio is 24.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abacus Global Management, Inc. is 3.27x versus 1.09x for Citizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.3.27x 88.75x $63M $7.1M CIACitizens, Inc. (Austin, Texas)1.09x 24.99x $62.8M $2.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns ABL or GNW?
Genworth Financial, Inc. has a net margin of 11.24% compared to Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net margin of 8.47%. Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.8% beat Genworth Financial, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.80.86% $0.07 $854.1M GNWGenworth Financial, Inc.-- $0.28 $11.3B -
What do Analysts Say About ABL or GNW?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.10, signalling upside risk potential of 88.76%. On the other hand Genworth Financial, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.21%. Given that Abacus Global Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, Inc., analysts believe Abacus Global Management, Inc. is more attractive than Genworth Financial, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.3 0 0 GNWGenworth Financial, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is ABL or GNW More Risky?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a beta of -0.062, which suggesting that the stock is 106.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial, Inc. has a beta of 1.018, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.829%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABL or GNW?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Genworth Financial, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Abacus Global Management, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ABL or GNW?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. quarterly revenues are $63M, which are smaller than Genworth Financial, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M is lower than Genworth Financial, Inc.'s net income of $155M. Notably, Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.75x while Genworth Financial, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abacus Global Management, Inc. is 3.27x versus 0.52x for Genworth Financial, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.3.27x 88.75x $63M $7.1M GNWGenworth Financial, Inc.0.52x 16.43x $1.8B $155M
-
Which has Higher Returns ABL or LNC?
Lincoln National Corp. has a net margin of 11.24% compared to Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net margin of 9.09%. Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.8% beat Lincoln National Corp.'s return on equity of 23.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.80.86% $0.07 $854.1M LNCLincoln National Corp.-- $2.12 $16.2B -
What do Analysts Say About ABL or LNC?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.10, signalling upside risk potential of 88.76%. On the other hand Lincoln National Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.96%. Given that Abacus Global Management, Inc. has higher upside potential than Lincoln National Corp., analysts believe Abacus Global Management, Inc. is more attractive than Lincoln National Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.3 0 0 LNCLincoln National Corp.1 9 1 -
Is ABL or LNC More Risky?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a beta of -0.062, which suggesting that the stock is 106.246% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National Corp. has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.865%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABL or LNC?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.88%. Lincoln National Corp. offers a yield of 4.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Abacus Global Management, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp. pays out 9.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ABL or LNC?
Abacus Global Management, Inc. quarterly revenues are $63M, which are smaller than Lincoln National Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s net income of $7.1M is lower than Lincoln National Corp.'s net income of $445M. Notably, Abacus Global Management, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 88.75x while Lincoln National Corp.'s PE ratio is 3.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abacus Global Management, Inc. is 3.27x versus 0.38x for Lincoln National Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABLAbacus Global Management, Inc.3.27x 88.75x $63M $7.1M LNCLincoln National Corp.0.38x 3.76x $4.9B $445M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
39
PSTG alert for Dec 5
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
38
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.
Buy
69
ASTS alert for Dec 5
AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 18.25% over the past day.
