LQMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Paul Mueller Co. has a net margin of -1491.89% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 7.95%. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.46% beat Paul Mueller Co.'s return on equity of 37.89%.

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2007.48%. On the other hand Paul Mueller Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller Co., analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Paul Mueller Co..

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.839% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paul Mueller Co. has a beta of 0.100, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.027%.

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paul Mueller Co. offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller Co. pays out 2.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $37K, which are smaller than Paul Mueller Co. quarterly revenues of $61.4M. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$552K is lower than Paul Mueller Co.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 436.44x while Paul Mueller Co.'s PE ratio is 10.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. is 118.11x versus 1.42x for Paul Mueller Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Productivity Technologies Corp. has a net margin of -1491.89% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of --. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.46% beat Productivity Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2007.48%. On the other hand Productivity Technologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Productivity Technologies Corp., analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Productivity Technologies Corp..

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.839% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Productivity Technologies Corp. has a beta of 342.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34103.406%.

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Productivity Technologies Corp. offers a yield of 644.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Productivity Technologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $37K, which are larger than Productivity Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$552K is higher than Productivity Technologies Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 436.44x while Productivity Technologies Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. is 118.11x versus 0.01x for Productivity Technologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs, Inc. has a net margin of -1491.89% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of 5.33%. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.46% beat Proto Labs, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.22%.

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2007.48%. On the other hand Proto Labs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.33 which suggests that it could grow by 9.65%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, Inc., analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Proto Labs, Inc..

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.839% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs, Inc. has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.003%.

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proto Labs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $37K, which are smaller than Proto Labs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $135.4M. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$552K is lower than Proto Labs, Inc.'s net income of $7.2M. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 436.44x while Proto Labs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 84.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. is 118.11x versus 2.42x for Proto Labs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International, Inc. has a net margin of -1491.89% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of --. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.46% beat RM2 International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2007.48%. On the other hand RM2 International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5900%. Given that RM2 International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc., analysts believe RM2 International, Inc. is more attractive than Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc..

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.382, which suggesting that the stock is 61.839% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International, Inc. has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.095%.

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RM2 International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are $37K, which are larger than RM2 International, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$552K is higher than RM2 International, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 436.44x while RM2 International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. is 118.11x versus 0.02x for RM2 International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.