KMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Paul Mueller Co. has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Kennametal, Inc.'s net margin of 7.95%. Kennametal, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.67% beat Paul Mueller Co.'s return on equity of 37.89%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.25, signalling downside risk potential of -12.17%. On the other hand Paul Mueller Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kennametal, Inc. has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller Co., analysts believe Kennametal, Inc. is more attractive than Paul Mueller Co..

Kennametal, Inc. has a beta of 1.481, which suggesting that the stock is 48.112% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paul Mueller Co. has a beta of 0.111, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.868%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. Paul Mueller Co. offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Kennametal, Inc. pays 66.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller Co. pays out 2.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kennametal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $498M, which are larger than Paul Mueller Co. quarterly revenues of $61.4M. Kennametal, Inc.'s net income of $24.6M is higher than Paul Mueller Co.'s net income of $4.9M. Notably, Kennametal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.28x while Paul Mueller Co.'s PE ratio is 12.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennametal, Inc. is 1.35x versus 1.59x for Paul Mueller Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs, Inc. has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Kennametal, Inc.'s net margin of 5.33%. Kennametal, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.67% beat Proto Labs, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.22%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.25, signalling downside risk potential of -12.17%. On the other hand Proto Labs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.33 which suggests that it could grow by 7.06%. Given that Proto Labs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kennametal, Inc., analysts believe Proto Labs, Inc. is more attractive than Kennametal, Inc..

Kennametal, Inc. has a beta of 1.481, which suggesting that the stock is 48.112% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs, Inc. has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.84%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. Proto Labs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennametal, Inc. pays 66.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kennametal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $498M, which are larger than Proto Labs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $135.4M. Kennametal, Inc.'s net income of $24.6M is higher than Proto Labs, Inc.'s net income of $7.2M. Notably, Kennametal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.28x while Proto Labs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 86.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennametal, Inc. is 1.35x versus 2.48x for Proto Labs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International, Inc. has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Kennametal, Inc.'s net margin of --. Kennametal, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.67% beat RM2 International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Kennametal, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.25, signalling downside risk potential of -12.17%. On the other hand RM2 International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7400%. Given that RM2 International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kennametal, Inc., analysts believe RM2 International, Inc. is more attractive than Kennametal, Inc..

Kennametal, Inc. has a beta of 1.481, which suggesting that the stock is 48.112% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International, Inc. has a beta of 0.201, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.862%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. RM2 International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennametal, Inc. pays 66.92% of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kennametal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $498M, which are larger than RM2 International, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Kennametal, Inc.'s net income of $24.6M is higher than RM2 International, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Kennametal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.28x while RM2 International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennametal, Inc. is 1.35x versus 0.01x for RM2 International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Kennametal, Inc.'s net margin of 1.37%. Kennametal, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.67% beat Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.93%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a consensus price target of $30.25, signalling downside risk potential of -12.17%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $87.51 which suggests that it could grow by 6.98%. Given that Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kennametal, Inc., analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is more attractive than Kennametal, Inc..

Kennametal, Inc. has a beta of 1.481, which suggesting that the stock is 48.112% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a beta of 1.209, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.871%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.32%. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. offers a yield of 4.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Kennametal, Inc. pays 66.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. pays out 172.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s is not.

Kennametal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $498M, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Kennametal, Inc.'s net income of $24.6M is lower than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net income of $51.4M. Notably, Kennametal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.28x while Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennametal, Inc. is 1.35x versus 0.82x for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.