KMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Proto Labs, Inc. has a net margin of 6.65% compared to Kennametal, Inc.'s net margin of 4.4%. Kennametal, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.86% beat Proto Labs, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.19%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling downside risk potential of -10.33%. On the other hand Proto Labs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $71.67 which suggests that it could grow by 6.14%. Given that Proto Labs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kennametal, Inc., analysts believe Proto Labs, Inc. is more attractive than Kennametal, Inc..

Kennametal, Inc. has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 49.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs, Inc. has a beta of 1.243, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.344%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Proto Labs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennametal, Inc. pays 66.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kennametal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $529.5M, which are larger than Proto Labs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $136.5M. Kennametal, Inc.'s net income of $35.2M is higher than Proto Labs, Inc.'s net income of $6M. Notably, Kennametal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.71x while Proto Labs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 76.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennametal, Inc. is 1.50x versus 3.07x for Proto Labs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International, Inc. has a net margin of 6.65% compared to Kennametal, Inc.'s net margin of --. Kennametal, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.86% beat RM2 International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Kennametal, Inc. has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling downside risk potential of -10.33%. On the other hand RM2 International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8471.43%. Given that RM2 International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kennametal, Inc., analysts believe RM2 International, Inc. is more attractive than Kennametal, Inc..

Kennametal, Inc. has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 49.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International, Inc. has a beta of 0.288, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.25%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. RM2 International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kennametal, Inc. pays 66.92% of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kennametal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $529.5M, which are larger than RM2 International, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Kennametal, Inc.'s net income of $35.2M is higher than RM2 International, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Kennametal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.71x while RM2 International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennametal, Inc. is 1.50x versus 0.01x for RM2 International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a net margin of 6.65% compared to Kennametal, Inc.'s net margin of 4.29%. Kennametal, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.86% beat Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s return on equity of 4.5%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling downside risk potential of -10.33%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $90.15 which suggests that it could fall by -1%. Given that Kennametal, Inc. has more downside risk than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., analysts believe Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is more attractive than Kennametal, Inc..

Kennametal, Inc. has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 49.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.092%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. offers a yield of 3.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Kennametal, Inc. pays 66.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. pays out 124.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s is not.

Kennametal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $529.5M, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Kennametal, Inc.'s net income of $35.2M is lower than Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s net income of $158.2M. Notably, Kennametal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.71x while Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennametal, Inc. is 1.50x versus 0.91x for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 6.65% compared to Kennametal, Inc.'s net margin of 13.39%. Kennametal, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.86% beat Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.21%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling downside risk potential of -10.33%. On the other hand Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $338.56 which suggests that it could grow by 3.05%. Given that Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kennametal, Inc., analysts believe Watts Water Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Kennametal, Inc..

Kennametal, Inc. has a beta of 1.500, which suggesting that the stock is 49.984% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Watts Water Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.639%.

Kennametal, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Kennametal, Inc. pays 66.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. pays out 19.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kennametal, Inc. quarterly revenues are $529.5M, which are smaller than Watts Water Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $625.1M. Kennametal, Inc.'s net income of $35.2M is lower than Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $83.7M. Notably, Kennametal, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 27.71x while Watts Water Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 32.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kennametal, Inc. is 1.50x versus 4.51x for Watts Water Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.