PRLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Liquidmetal Technologies has a net margin of -0.33% compared to Proto Labs's net margin of -384.5%. Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.43% beat Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -5.03%.

Proto Labs has a consensus price target of $44.33, signalling upside risk potential of 20.67%. On the other hand Liquidmetal Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4778.05%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Proto Labs.

Proto Labs has a beta of 1.447, which suggesting that the stock is 44.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.988%.

Proto Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liquidmetal Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Proto Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liquidmetal Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Proto Labs quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are larger than Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues of $129K. Proto Labs's net income of -$404K is higher than Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$496K. Notably, Proto Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.52x while Liquidmetal Technologies's PE ratio is 41,000.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proto Labs is 1.85x versus 43.73x for Liquidmetal Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paul Mueller has a net margin of -0.33% compared to Proto Labs's net margin of --. Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.43% beat Paul Mueller's return on equity of --.

Proto Labs has a consensus price target of $44.33, signalling upside risk potential of 20.67%. On the other hand Paul Mueller has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Proto Labs has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller, analysts believe Proto Labs is more attractive than Paul Mueller.

Proto Labs has a beta of 1.447, which suggesting that the stock is 44.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paul Mueller has a beta of 0.403, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.704%.

Proto Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paul Mueller offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Proto Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Proto Labs quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are larger than Paul Mueller quarterly revenues of --. Proto Labs's net income of -$404K is higher than Paul Mueller's net income of --. Notably, Proto Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.52x while Paul Mueller's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proto Labs is 1.85x versus -- for Paul Mueller. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Productivity Technologies has a net margin of -0.33% compared to Proto Labs's net margin of --. Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.43% beat Productivity Technologies's return on equity of --.

Proto Labs has a consensus price target of $44.33, signalling upside risk potential of 20.67%. On the other hand Productivity Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Proto Labs has higher upside potential than Productivity Technologies, analysts believe Proto Labs is more attractive than Productivity Technologies.

Proto Labs has a beta of 1.447, which suggesting that the stock is 44.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Productivity Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Proto Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Productivity Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Proto Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Productivity Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Proto Labs quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are larger than Productivity Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Proto Labs's net income of -$404K is higher than Productivity Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Proto Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.52x while Productivity Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proto Labs is 1.85x versus -- for Productivity Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International has a net margin of -0.33% compared to Proto Labs's net margin of --. Proto Labs's return on equity of 2.43% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.

Proto Labs has a consensus price target of $44.33, signalling upside risk potential of 20.67%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5354.55%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Proto Labs.

Proto Labs has a beta of 1.447, which suggesting that the stock is 44.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.658, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.164%.

Proto Labs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Proto Labs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Proto Labs quarterly revenues are $121.8M, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. Proto Labs's net income of -$404K is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, Proto Labs's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.52x while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Proto Labs is 1.85x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.