MUEL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Paul Mueller Co.'s net margin of -1491.89%. Paul Mueller Co.'s return on equity of 37.89% beat Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -7.46%.

Paul Mueller Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2007.48%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller Co., analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Paul Mueller Co..

Paul Mueller Co. has a beta of 0.100, which suggesting that the stock is 90.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.839%.

Paul Mueller Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paul Mueller Co. pays 2.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Paul Mueller Co. quarterly revenues are $61.4M, which are larger than Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37K. Paul Mueller Co.'s net income of $4.9M is higher than Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$552K. Notably, Paul Mueller Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 436.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paul Mueller Co. is 1.42x versus 118.11x for Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Productivity Technologies Corp. has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Paul Mueller Co.'s net margin of --. Paul Mueller Co.'s return on equity of 37.89% beat Productivity Technologies Corp.'s return on equity of --.

Paul Mueller Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Productivity Technologies Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Paul Mueller Co. has higher upside potential than Productivity Technologies Corp., analysts believe Paul Mueller Co. is more attractive than Productivity Technologies Corp..

Paul Mueller Co. has a beta of 0.100, which suggesting that the stock is 90.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Productivity Technologies Corp. has a beta of 342.034, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34103.406%.

Paul Mueller Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Productivity Technologies Corp. offers a yield of 644.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Paul Mueller Co. pays 2.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Productivity Technologies Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Paul Mueller Co. quarterly revenues are $61.4M, which are larger than Productivity Technologies Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Paul Mueller Co.'s net income of $4.9M is higher than Productivity Technologies Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Paul Mueller Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Productivity Technologies Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paul Mueller Co. is 1.42x versus 0.01x for Productivity Technologies Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Proto Labs, Inc. has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Paul Mueller Co.'s net margin of 5.33%. Paul Mueller Co.'s return on equity of 37.89% beat Proto Labs, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.22%.

Paul Mueller Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Proto Labs, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.33 which suggests that it could grow by 9.65%. Given that Proto Labs, Inc. has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller Co., analysts believe Proto Labs, Inc. is more attractive than Paul Mueller Co..

Paul Mueller Co. has a beta of 0.100, which suggesting that the stock is 90.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs, Inc. has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.003%.

Paul Mueller Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. Proto Labs, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paul Mueller Co. pays 2.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Paul Mueller Co. quarterly revenues are $61.4M, which are smaller than Proto Labs, Inc. quarterly revenues of $135.4M. Paul Mueller Co.'s net income of $4.9M is lower than Proto Labs, Inc.'s net income of $7.2M. Notably, Paul Mueller Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while Proto Labs, Inc.'s PE ratio is 84.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paul Mueller Co. is 1.42x versus 2.42x for Proto Labs, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RM2 International, Inc. has a net margin of 7.95% compared to Paul Mueller Co.'s net margin of --. Paul Mueller Co.'s return on equity of 37.89% beat RM2 International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Paul Mueller Co. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RM2 International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5900%. Given that RM2 International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller Co., analysts believe RM2 International, Inc. is more attractive than Paul Mueller Co..

Paul Mueller Co. has a beta of 0.100, which suggesting that the stock is 90.027% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International, Inc. has a beta of 0.239, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.095%.

Paul Mueller Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.26%. RM2 International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Paul Mueller Co. pays 2.76% of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Paul Mueller Co. quarterly revenues are $61.4M, which are larger than RM2 International, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Paul Mueller Co.'s net income of $4.9M is higher than RM2 International, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Paul Mueller Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.76x while RM2 International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Paul Mueller Co. is 1.42x versus 0.02x for RM2 International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.