Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
41
KBDCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.05
Seasonality move
:
0%
Day range:
$15.05 - $15.05
52-week range:
$11.65 - $15.05
Dividend yield:
5.24%
P/E ratio:
9.61x
P/S ratio:
0.59x
P/B ratio:
0.43x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
29.18%
Market cap:
$3.3B
Revenue:
$5.5B
EPS (TTM):
$1.57
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KBDCY
Kingboard Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KBDCY
Kingboard Holdings Ltd.
|
$15.05 | -- | $3.3B | 9.61x | $0.44 | 5.24% | 0.59x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$0.44 | -- | $10.7M | 810.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.68x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
$1.19 | -- | $9.1M | 11.50x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.60x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.98 | -- | $4.5M | 75.33x | $0.05 | 0% | 0.71x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
$0.47 | -- | $9.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.13x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
$2.41 | -- | $143.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 20.96x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KBDCY
Kingboard Holdings Ltd.
|
26.61% | -0.325 | -- | 1.15x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
3.68% | -2.181 | 1.05% | 5.03x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | 1.418 | -- | 1.59x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
7.57% | 0.683 | 7.57% | 2.98x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
2.59% | 4.234 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | 4.699 | -- | 6.29x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KBDCY
Kingboard Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.86% | 2.51% | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$384.3K | -$268.8K | -122.09% | -124.48% | -7.04% | -$727.4K |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$301K | -$542K | -7.38% | -8.32% | -45.93% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KBDCY or CIIT?
Tianci International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -7.04%. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.51% beat Tianci International, Inc.'s return on equity of -124.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.1B CIITTianci International, Inc.10.07% -$0.02 $2.8M -
What do Analysts Say About KBDCY or CIIT?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tianci International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tianci International, Inc., analysts believe Kingboard Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Tianci International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CIITTianci International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is KBDCY or CIIT More Risky?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tianci International, Inc. has a beta of -2.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 385.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBDCY or CIIT?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. Tianci International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingboard Holdings Ltd. pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Tianci International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBDCY or CIIT?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tianci International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tianci International, Inc.'s net income of -$268.9K. Notably, Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while Tianci International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 810.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingboard Holdings Ltd. is 0.59x versus 0.68x for Tianci International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.0.59x 9.61x -- -- CIITTianci International, Inc.0.68x 810.21x $3.8M -$268.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns KBDCY or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.51% beat Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.1B CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M -
What do Analysts Say About KBDCY or CLWT?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd., analysts believe Kingboard Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is KBDCY or CLWT More Risky?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.111%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBDCY or CLWT?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Kingboard Holdings Ltd. pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBDCY or CLWT?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingboard Holdings Ltd. is 0.59x versus 0.60x for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.0.59x 9.61x -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.60x 11.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KBDCY or HIHO?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -31.53%. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.51% beat Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.1B HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.25.51% -$0.08 $6.5M -
What do Analysts Say About KBDCY or HIHO?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Kingboard Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Highway Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is KBDCY or HIHO More Risky?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.149%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBDCY or HIHO?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. Highway Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Kingboard Holdings Ltd. pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays out 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Highway Holdings Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBDCY or HIHO?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.2M. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$372K. Notably, Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while Highway Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 75.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingboard Holdings Ltd. is 0.59x versus 0.71x for Highway Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.0.59x 9.61x -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0.71x 75.33x $1.2M -$372K
-
Which has Higher Returns KBDCY or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.51% beat Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.1B ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About KBDCY or ILAG?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe Kingboard Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is KBDCY or ILAG More Risky?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBDCY or ILAG?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingboard Holdings Ltd. pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBDCY or ILAG?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingboard Holdings Ltd. is 0.59x versus 1.13x for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.0.59x 9.61x -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.1.13x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KBDCY or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.51% beat Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.1B ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M -
What do Analysts Say About KBDCY or ROMA?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance Ltd., analysts believe Kingboard Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Roma Green Finance Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is KBDCY or ROMA More Risky?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KBDCY or ROMA?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.24%. Roma Green Finance Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingboard Holdings Ltd. pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KBDCY or ROMA?
Kingboard Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Kingboard Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 9.61x while Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingboard Holdings Ltd. is 0.59x versus 20.96x for Roma Green Finance Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KBDCYKingboard Holdings Ltd.0.59x 9.61x -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.20.96x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 58x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
67
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Sell
46
BE alert for Dec 18
Bloom Energy Corp. [BE] is up 4.27% over the past day.
Sell
44
STRL alert for Dec 18
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. [STRL] is up 6.62% over the past day.
Sell
39
SOXL alert for Dec 18
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares [SOXL] is up 7.28% over the past day.
