HOEGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MPC Container Ships ASA has a net margin of 35.41% compared to Höegh Autoliners ASA's net margin of 42.58%. Höegh Autoliners ASA's return on equity of 44.64% beat MPC Container Ships ASA's return on equity of 29.83%.

Höegh Autoliners ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MPC Container Ships ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Höegh Autoliners ASA has higher upside potential than MPC Container Ships ASA, analysts believe Höegh Autoliners ASA is more attractive than MPC Container Ships ASA.

Höegh Autoliners ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MPC Container Ships ASA has a beta of 0.510, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.015%.

Höegh Autoliners ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 23.02%. MPC Container Ships ASA offers a yield of 16.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Höegh Autoliners ASA pays 94.6% of its earnings as a dividend. MPC Container Ships ASA pays out 69.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Höegh Autoliners ASA quarterly revenues are $370.5M, which are larger than MPC Container Ships ASA quarterly revenues of $125.9M. Höegh Autoliners ASA's net income of $131.2M is higher than MPC Container Ships ASA's net income of $53.6M. Notably, Höegh Autoliners ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.33x while MPC Container Ships ASA's PE ratio is 2.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Höegh Autoliners ASA is 1.28x versus 1.43x for MPC Container Ships ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NEL ASA has a net margin of 35.41% compared to Höegh Autoliners ASA's net margin of -27.92%. Höegh Autoliners ASA's return on equity of 44.64% beat NEL ASA's return on equity of -9.16%.

Höegh Autoliners ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NEL ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Höegh Autoliners ASA has higher upside potential than NEL ASA, analysts believe Höegh Autoliners ASA is more attractive than NEL ASA.

Höegh Autoliners ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NEL ASA has a beta of 1.648, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.838%.

Höegh Autoliners ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 23.02%. NEL ASA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Höegh Autoliners ASA pays 94.6% of its earnings as a dividend. NEL ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Höegh Autoliners ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Höegh Autoliners ASA quarterly revenues are $370.5M, which are larger than NEL ASA quarterly revenues of $30M. Höegh Autoliners ASA's net income of $131.2M is higher than NEL ASA's net income of -$8.4M. Notably, Höegh Autoliners ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.33x while NEL ASA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Höegh Autoliners ASA is 1.28x versus 3.84x for NEL ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a net margin of 35.41% compared to Höegh Autoliners ASA's net margin of 21.25%. Höegh Autoliners ASA's return on equity of 44.64% beat Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's return on equity of 40.37%.

Höegh Autoliners ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Höegh Autoliners ASA has higher upside potential than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA, analysts believe Höegh Autoliners ASA is more attractive than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA.

Höegh Autoliners ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has a beta of 1.842, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.156%.

Höegh Autoliners ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 23.02%. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA offers a yield of 5.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Höegh Autoliners ASA pays 94.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Höegh Autoliners ASA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Höegh Autoliners ASA quarterly revenues are $370.5M, which are smaller than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Höegh Autoliners ASA's net income of $131.2M is lower than Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's net income of $252.5M. Notably, Höegh Autoliners ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.33x while Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA's PE ratio is 7.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Höegh Autoliners ASA is 1.28x versus 0.48x for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tomra Systems ASA has a net margin of 35.41% compared to Höegh Autoliners ASA's net margin of 5.56%. Höegh Autoliners ASA's return on equity of 44.64% beat Tomra Systems ASA's return on equity of 17.24%.

Höegh Autoliners ASA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tomra Systems ASA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Höegh Autoliners ASA has higher upside potential than Tomra Systems ASA, analysts believe Höegh Autoliners ASA is more attractive than Tomra Systems ASA.

Höegh Autoliners ASA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tomra Systems ASA has a beta of 2.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.917%.

Höegh Autoliners ASA has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 23.02%. Tomra Systems ASA offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Höegh Autoliners ASA pays 94.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Tomra Systems ASA pays out 39.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Höegh Autoliners ASA quarterly revenues are $370.5M, which are larger than Tomra Systems ASA quarterly revenues of $357.6M. Höegh Autoliners ASA's net income of $131.2M is higher than Tomra Systems ASA's net income of $19.9M. Notably, Höegh Autoliners ASA's price-to-earnings ratio is 3.33x while Tomra Systems ASA's PE ratio is 35.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Höegh Autoliners ASA is 1.28x versus 2.74x for Tomra Systems ASA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.