Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
68
HLDCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.76
Seasonality move
:
0.64%
Day range:
$3.70 - $3.87
52-week range:
$2.47 - $3.95
Dividend yield:
6.15%
P/E ratio:
23.51x
P/S ratio:
6.16x
P/B ratio:
0.41x
Volume:
25.8K
Avg. volume:
13.7K
1-year change:
26.6%
Market cap:
$18.2B
Revenue:
$3.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.16
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLDCY
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLDCY
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.
|
$3.76 | -- | $18.2B | 23.51x | $0.06 | 6.15% | 6.16x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
$13.20 | -- | $3.8B | 47.24x | $0.26 | 6.58% | 1.31x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
$6.81 | -- | $12.5B | 23.46x | $0.28 | 5.47% | 11.18x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
$12.55 | -- | $36.4B | 14.70x | $0.36 | 3.83% | 3.53x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
$0.57 | -- | $840.4M | 3.18x | $0.01 | 6.7% | 0.65x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
$5.81 | -- | $8.9B | 80.35x | $0.05 | 1.76% | 6.43x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLDCY
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.
|
20.34% | 0.778 | -- | 0.60x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
36.58% | -2.040 | -- | 0.61x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
1.79% | 0.541 | -- | 6.16x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
16.81% | 0.586 | -- | 0.56x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
23.41% | 0.708 | -- | 0.58x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
12.54% | -0.028 | -- | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HLDCY
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.47% | 1.84% | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.46% | 0.68% | -- | -$181.1K |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.14% | 2.17% | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.36% | 2.86% | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.57% | -0.73% | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -1.43% | -1.64% | -- | -- |
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HLDCY or KRYPY?
Kerry Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.84% beat Kerry Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.-- -- $54.5B KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.-- -- $22.7B -
What do Analysts Say About HLDCY or KRYPY?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties Ltd., analysts believe Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Kerry Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.0 0 0 KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HLDCY or KRYPY More Risky?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.032, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.829%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLDCY or KRYPY?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. Kerry Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 6.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. pays 118.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties Ltd. pays out 207.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLDCY or KRYPY?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while Kerry Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. is 6.16x versus 1.31x for Kerry Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.6.16x 23.51x -- -- KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.1.31x 47.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HLDCY or SNLAY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.84% beat Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.-- -- $54.5B SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B -
What do Analysts Say About HLDCY or SNLAY?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sino Land Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sino Land Co. Ltd., analysts believe Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Sino Land Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.0 0 0 SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HLDCY or SNLAY More Risky?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.313, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.748%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLDCY or SNLAY?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. Sino Land Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 5.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. pays 118.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays out 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLDCY or SNLAY?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. is 6.16x versus 11.18x for Sino Land Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.6.16x 23.51x -- -- SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.11.18x 23.46x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HLDCY or SUHJY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.84% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.-- -- $54.5B SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B -
What do Analysts Say About HLDCY or SUHJY?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd., analysts believe Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.0 0 0 SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HLDCY or SUHJY More Risky?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.988%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLDCY or SUHJY?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. pays 118.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays out 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLDCY or SUHJY?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. is 6.16x versus 3.53x for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.6.16x 23.51x -- -- SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.3.53x 14.70x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HLDCY or TIACF?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.84% beat Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.-- -- $54.5B TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About HLDCY or TIACF?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd., analysts believe Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.0 0 0 TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HLDCY or TIACF More Risky?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.062%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLDCY or TIACF?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 6.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. pays 118.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays out 205.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLDCY or TIACF?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. is 6.16x versus 0.65x for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.6.16x 23.51x -- -- TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.65x 3.18x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HLDCY or WARFY?
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.84% beat The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.-- -- $54.5B WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.-- -- $20.4B -
What do Analysts Say About HLDCY or WARFY?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd., analysts believe Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.0 0 0 WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is HLDCY or WARFY More Risky?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.502, which suggesting that the stock is 49.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of 0.041, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.911%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HLDCY or WARFY?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.15%. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. pays 118.04% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. pays out 46.8% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HLDCY or WARFY?
Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 23.51x while The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. is 6.16x versus 6.43x for The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HLDCYHenderson Land Development Co. Ltd.6.16x 23.51x -- -- WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.6.43x 80.35x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
