SNLAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Poly Property Group has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land's net margin of --. Sino Land's return on equity of 2.67% beat Poly Property Group's return on equity of 2.64%.

Sino Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Poly Property Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land has higher upside potential than Poly Property Group, analysts believe Sino Land is more attractive than Poly Property Group.

Sino Land has a beta of 0.387, which suggesting that the stock is 61.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Poly Property Group has a beta of 0.342, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.809%.

Sino Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Poly Property Group offers a yield of 4.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sino Land pays 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group pays out 11.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sino Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Poly Property Group quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land's net income of -- is lower than Poly Property Group's net income of --. Notably, Sino Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.90x while Poly Property Group's PE ratio is 5.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land is 7.60x versus 0.16x for Poly Property Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sun Hung Kai Properties has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land's net margin of --. Sino Land's return on equity of 2.67% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties's return on equity of 3.13%.

Sino Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties, analysts believe Sino Land is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties.

Sino Land has a beta of 0.387, which suggesting that the stock is 61.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.483%.

Sino Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Sun Hung Kai Properties offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Sino Land pays 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties pays out 70.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sino Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land's net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties's net income of --. Notably, Sino Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.90x while Sun Hung Kai Properties's PE ratio is 11.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land is 7.60x versus 3.01x for Sun Hung Kai Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tian An China Investments has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land's net margin of --. Sino Land's return on equity of 2.67% beat Tian An China Investments's return on equity of 2.55%.

Sino Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments, analysts believe Sino Land is more attractive than Tian An China Investments.

Sino Land has a beta of 0.387, which suggesting that the stock is 61.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.563%.

Sino Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. Tian An China Investments offers a yield of 5.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Sino Land pays 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sino Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land's net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments's net income of --. Notably, Sino Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.90x while Tian An China Investments's PE ratio is 7.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land is 7.60x versus 1.61x for Tian An China Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wharf (Holdings) has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land's net margin of --. Sino Land's return on equity of 2.67% beat The Wharf (Holdings)'s return on equity of -1.64%.

Sino Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings), analysts believe Sino Land is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings).

Sino Land has a beta of 0.387, which suggesting that the stock is 61.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) has a beta of 0.442, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.835%.

Sino Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.35%. The Wharf (Holdings) offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sino Land pays 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) pays out 129.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Wharf (Holdings)'s is not.

Sino Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land's net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings)'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.90x while The Wharf (Holdings)'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land is 7.60x versus 3.68x for The Wharf (Holdings). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.