Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
38
SNLAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.25
Seasonality move
:
1.44%
Day range:
$7.25 - $7.25
52-week range:
$4.50 - $7.25
Dividend yield:
5.14%
P/E ratio:
24.97x
P/S ratio:
11.90x
P/B ratio:
0.52x
Volume:
59
Avg. volume:
1.2K
1-year change:
43%
Market cap:
$13.3B
Revenue:
$1.1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.29
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
$7.25 | -- | $13.3B | 24.97x | $0.28 | 5.14% | 11.90x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
$12.50 | -- | $3.6B | 44.74x | $0.26 | 6.95% | 1.24x |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
$0.28 | -- | $1.1B | 459.50x | $0.00 | 4.83% | 0.16x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
$12.68 | -- | $36.7B | 14.85x | $0.36 | 3.8% | 3.57x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
$0.57 | -- | $840.4M | 3.18x | $0.01 | 6.7% | 0.65x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
$6.06 | -- | $9.3B | 80.35x | $0.05 | 1.69% | 6.71x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
1.79% | 0.541 | -- | 6.16x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
36.58% | -2.040 | -- | 0.61x |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
67.32% | 1.234 | -- | 0.52x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
16.81% | 0.586 | -- | 0.56x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
23.41% | 0.708 | -- | 0.58x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
12.54% | -0.028 | -- | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.14% | 2.17% | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.46% | 0.68% | -- | -$181.1K |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.16% | 0.4% | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.36% | 2.86% | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.57% | -0.73% | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -1.43% | -1.64% | -- | -- |
Sino Land Co. Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SNLAY or KRYPY?
Kerry Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat Kerry Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.-- -- $22.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SNLAY or KRYPY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Kerry Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNLAY or KRYPY More Risky?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.313, which suggesting that the stock is 68.748% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.032, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.829%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAY or KRYPY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. Kerry Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 6.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties Ltd. pays out 207.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAY or KRYPY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.97x while Kerry Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 44.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 11.90x versus 1.24x for Kerry Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.11.90x 24.97x -- -- KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.1.24x 44.74x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNLAY or PHKIF?
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.-- -- $16B -
What do Analysts Say About SNLAY or PHKIF?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNLAY or PHKIF More Risky?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.313, which suggesting that the stock is 68.748% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.002, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.171%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAY or PHKIF?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 4.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. pays out 40.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAY or PHKIF?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.97x while Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 459.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 11.90x versus 0.16x for Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.11.90x 24.97x -- -- PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.0.16x 459.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNLAY or SUHJY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SNLAY or SUHJY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNLAY or SUHJY More Risky?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.313, which suggesting that the stock is 68.748% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.988%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAY or SUHJY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays out 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAY or SUHJY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.97x while Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 11.90x versus 3.57x for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.11.90x 24.97x -- -- SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.3.57x 14.85x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNLAY or TIACF?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SNLAY or TIACF?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNLAY or TIACF More Risky?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.313, which suggesting that the stock is 68.748% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.062%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAY or TIACF?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 6.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays out 205.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAY or TIACF?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.97x while Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 11.90x versus 0.65x for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.11.90x 24.97x -- -- TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.65x 3.18x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SNLAY or WARFY?
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.-- -- $20.4B -
What do Analysts Say About SNLAY or WARFY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SNLAY or WARFY More Risky?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.313, which suggesting that the stock is 68.748% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of 0.041, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.911%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SNLAY or WARFY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.14%. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. pays out 46.8% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SNLAY or WARFY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 24.97x while The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 11.90x versus 6.71x for The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.11.90x 24.97x -- -- WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.6.71x 80.35x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
