SNLAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kerry Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat Kerry Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.68%.

Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Kerry Properties Ltd..

Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.179, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.09%.

Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Kerry Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 5.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties Ltd. pays out 242.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.77x while Kerry Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 54.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 11.05x versus 1.52x for Kerry Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.4%.

Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd..

Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.013, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.275%.

Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. pays out 40.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s is not.

Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.77x while Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 459.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 11.05x versus 0.16x for Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86%.

Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd..

Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.396, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.389%.

Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 2.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays out 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s is not.

Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.77x while Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 18.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 11.05x versus 4.50x for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17% beat Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73%.

Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sino Land Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd., analysts believe Sino Land Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd..

Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.146, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.648%.

Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.93%. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 6.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays out 205.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 28.77x while Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sino Land Co. Ltd. is 11.05x versus 0.65x for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.