Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
18
CAOVY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.88
Seasonality move
:
0.3%
Day range:
$7.88 - $7.88
52-week range:
$7.10 - $9.94
Dividend yield:
4.46%
P/E ratio:
8.95x
P/S ratio:
0.68x
P/B ratio:
0.37x
Volume:
1.3K
Avg. volume:
23.5K
1-year change:
-0.63%
Market cap:
$17.2B
Revenue:
$26B
EPS (TTM):
$0.89
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
$7.88 | -- | $17.2B | 8.95x | $0.16 | 4.46% | 0.68x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
$13.20 | -- | $3.8B | 47.24x | $0.26 | 6.58% | 1.31x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
$6.81 | -- | $12.5B | 23.46x | $0.28 | 5.47% | 11.18x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
$12.55 | -- | $36.4B | 14.70x | $0.36 | 3.83% | 3.53x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
$0.57 | -- | $840.4M | 3.18x | $0.01 | 6.7% | 0.65x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
$5.81 | -- | $8.9B | 80.35x | $0.05 | 1.76% | 6.43x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
40.3% | -0.208 | -- | 0.47x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
36.58% | -2.040 | -- | 0.61x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
1.79% | 0.541 | -- | 6.16x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
16.81% | 0.586 | -- | 0.56x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
23.41% | 0.708 | -- | 0.58x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
12.54% | -0.028 | -- | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.47% | 5.72% | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.46% | 0.68% | -- | -$181.1K |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.14% | 2.17% | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.36% | 2.86% | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.57% | -0.73% | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -1.43% | -1.64% | -- | -- |
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or KRYPY?
Kerry Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.72% beat Kerry Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.-- -- $90.3B KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.-- -- $22.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or KRYPY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties Ltd., analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. is more attractive than Kerry Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0 0 0 KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or KRYPY More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a beta of -0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 168.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.032, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.829%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or KRYPY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Kerry Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 6.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. pays 32.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties Ltd. pays out 207.54% of its earnings as a dividend. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kerry Properties Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or KRYPY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while Kerry Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. is 0.68x versus 1.31x for Kerry Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0.68x 8.95x -- -- KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.1.31x 47.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or SNLAY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.72% beat Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.-- -- $90.3B SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or SNLAY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sino Land Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sino Land Co. Ltd., analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. is more attractive than Sino Land Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0 0 0 SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or SNLAY More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a beta of -0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 168.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.313, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.748%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or SNLAY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Sino Land Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 5.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. pays 32.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays out 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or SNLAY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. is 0.68x versus 11.18x for Sino Land Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0.68x 8.95x -- -- SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.11.18x 23.46x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or SUHJY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.72% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.-- -- $90.3B SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or SUHJY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd., analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0 0 0 SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or SUHJY More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a beta of -0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 168.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.988%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or SUHJY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 3.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. pays 32.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays out 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or SUHJY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. is 0.68x versus 3.53x for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0.68x 8.95x -- -- SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.3.53x 14.70x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or TIACF?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.72% beat Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.-- -- $90.3B TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or TIACF?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd., analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. is more attractive than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0 0 0 TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or TIACF More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a beta of -0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 168.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.062%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or TIACF?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 6.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. pays 32.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays out 205.22% of its earnings as a dividend. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or TIACF?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. is 0.68x versus 0.65x for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0.68x 8.95x -- -- TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.65x 3.18x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or WARFY?
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.72% beat The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.-- -- $90.3B WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.-- -- $20.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or WARFY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd., analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0 0 0 WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or WARFY More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a beta of -0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 168.119% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of 0.041, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.911%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or WARFY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.46%. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. pays 32.91% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. pays out 46.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or WARFY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.95x while The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. is 0.68x versus 6.43x for The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0.68x 8.95x -- -- WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.6.43x 80.35x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
