How High Can Palantir Stock Go?
Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ:PLTR) has been one of the undisputed victors…
Sell
46
CAOVY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$8.01
Seasonality move
:
3.37%
Day range:
$7.84 - $8.20
52-week range:
$6.55 - $11.87
Dividend yield:
6.01%
P/E ratio:
5.37x
P/S ratio:
0.63x
P/B ratio:
0.34x
Volume:
2.5K
Avg. volume:
3.2K
1-year change:
-5.1%
Market cap:
$17.5B
Revenue:
$28.6B
EPS (TTM):
$1.42
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRBJF
China Resources Land
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
YUPRF
Yuexiu Property
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment
|
$8.01 | -- | $17.5B | 5.37x | $0.19 | 6.01% | 0.63x |
|
CRBJF
China Resources Land
|
$2.8500 | -- | $20.3B | 5.25x | $0.03 | 7.12% | 0.57x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties
|
$10.64 | -- | $3.1B | 9.78x | $0.26 | 8.11% | 1.91x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land
|
$5.05 | -- | $8.7B | 14.90x | $0.28 | 7.35% | 7.60x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
|
$9.51 | -- | $27.6B | 11.46x | $0.36 | 5.05% | 3.01x |
|
YUPRF
Yuexiu Property
|
$0.86 | -- | $2.7B | -- | $0.02 | 5.03% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment
|
40.3% | -1.682 | 162.63% | 0.47x |
|
CRBJF
China Resources Land
|
47.8% | 0.758 | 79.89% | 0.35x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties
|
36.72% | -0.741 | 176.43% | 0.58x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land
|
1.46% | -0.161 | 3.56% | 6.99x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
|
17.32% | 0.684 | 63.44% | 0.55x |
|
YUPRF
Yuexiu Property
|
-- | -2.794 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment
|
-- | -- | 3.47% | 5.72% | -- | -- |
|
CRBJF
China Resources Land
|
-- | -- | 4.56% | 7.37% | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties
|
-- | -- | 1.3% | 1.92% | -- | -$181.1K |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land
|
-- | -- | 2.63% | 2.67% | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
|
-- | -- | 2.58% | 3.13% | -- | -- |
|
YUPRF
Yuexiu Property
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
China Overseas Land & Investment vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or CRBJF?
China Resources Land has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment's net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's return on equity of 5.72% beat China Resources Land's return on equity of 7.37%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment-- -- $90.3B CRBJFChina Resources Land-- -- $87.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or CRBJF?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Land has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment has higher upside potential than China Resources Land, analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment is more attractive than China Resources Land.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0 0 0 CRBJFChina Resources Land0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or CRBJF More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a beta of -0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 127.859% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Land has a beta of 4,573.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 457240.302%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or CRBJF?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.01%. China Resources Land offers a yield of 7.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment pays 29.54% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Land pays out 33.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or CRBJF?
China Overseas Land & Investment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Land quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's net income of -- is lower than China Resources Land's net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while China Resources Land's PE ratio is 5.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment is 0.63x versus 0.57x for China Resources Land. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0.63x 5.37x -- -- CRBJFChina Resources Land0.57x 5.25x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or KRYPY?
Kerry Properties has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment's net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's return on equity of 5.72% beat Kerry Properties's return on equity of 1.92%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment-- -- $90.3B KRYPYKerry Properties-- -- $23B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or KRYPY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties, analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment is more attractive than Kerry Properties.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0 0 0 KRYPYKerry Properties0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or KRYPY More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a beta of -0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 127.859% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.577%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or KRYPY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.01%. Kerry Properties offers a yield of 8.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment pays 29.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties pays out 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or KRYPY?
China Overseas Land & Investment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties's net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while Kerry Properties's PE ratio is 9.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment is 0.63x versus 1.91x for Kerry Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0.63x 5.37x -- -- KRYPYKerry Properties1.91x 9.78x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or SNLAY?
Sino Land has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment's net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's return on equity of 5.72% beat Sino Land's return on equity of 2.67%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment-- -- $90.3B SNLAYSino Land-- -- $21.6B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or SNLAY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sino Land has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment has higher upside potential than Sino Land, analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment is more attractive than Sino Land.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0 0 0 SNLAYSino Land0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or SNLAY More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a beta of -0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 127.859% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Land has a beta of 0.387, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.297%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or SNLAY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.01%. Sino Land offers a yield of 7.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment pays 29.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land pays out 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or SNLAY?
China Overseas Land & Investment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sino Land quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's net income of -- is lower than Sino Land's net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while Sino Land's PE ratio is 14.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment is 0.63x versus 7.60x for Sino Land. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0.63x 5.37x -- -- SNLAYSino Land7.60x 14.90x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or SUHJY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment's net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's return on equity of 5.72% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties's return on equity of 3.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment-- -- $90.3B SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties-- -- $94.5B -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or SUHJY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties, analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0 0 0 SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or SUHJY More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a beta of -0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 127.859% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.483%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or SUHJY?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.01%. Sun Hung Kai Properties offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment pays 29.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties pays out 70.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or SUHJY?
China Overseas Land & Investment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties's net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while Sun Hung Kai Properties's PE ratio is 11.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment is 0.63x versus 3.01x for Sun Hung Kai Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0.63x 5.37x -- -- SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties3.01x 11.46x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOVY or YUPRF?
Yuexiu Property has a net margin of -- compared to China Overseas Land & Investment's net margin of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's return on equity of 5.72% beat Yuexiu Property's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment-- -- $90.3B YUPRFYuexiu Property-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CAOVY or YUPRF?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Yuexiu Property has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Overseas Land & Investment has higher upside potential than Yuexiu Property, analysts believe China Overseas Land & Investment is more attractive than Yuexiu Property.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0 0 0 YUPRFYuexiu Property0 0 0 -
Is CAOVY or YUPRF More Risky?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a beta of -0.279, which suggesting that the stock is 127.859% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yuexiu Property has a beta of -10.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1150.928%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOVY or YUPRF?
China Overseas Land & Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.01%. Yuexiu Property offers a yield of 5.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. China Overseas Land & Investment pays 29.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Yuexiu Property pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Overseas Land & Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOVY or YUPRF?
China Overseas Land & Investment quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Yuexiu Property quarterly revenues of --. China Overseas Land & Investment's net income of -- is lower than Yuexiu Property's net income of --. Notably, China Overseas Land & Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.37x while Yuexiu Property's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Overseas Land & Investment is 0.63x versus -- for Yuexiu Property. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment0.63x 5.37x -- -- YUPRFYuexiu Property-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will This ETF Beat the Market Over the Next 12 Months?
2024 was another banner year for the US stock market,…
Why Did Carlos Slim Buy PBF Energy?
Carlos Slim made a splash in a surprising sector last…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 121x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
39
DOGZ alert for Jan 4
Dogness (International) [DOGZ] is down 20.52% over the past day.
Buy
66
DMRC alert for Jan 4
Digimarc [DMRC] is up 16.19% over the past day.
Sell
39
MSTR alert for Jan 4
MicroStrategy [MSTR] is up 13.33% over the past day.
