Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
25
TIACF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.57
Seasonality move
:
4.37%
Day range:
$0.57 - $0.57
52-week range:
$0.45 - $0.69
Dividend yield:
6.7%
P/E ratio:
3.18x
P/S ratio:
0.65x
P/B ratio:
0.21x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
33
1-year change:
27.75%
Market cap:
$840.4M
Revenue:
$386M
EPS (TTM):
$0.18
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
$0.57 | -- | $840.4M | 3.18x | $0.01 | 6.7% | 0.65x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
$12.50 | -- | $3.6B | 44.74x | $0.26 | 6.95% | 1.24x |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
$0.28 | -- | $1.1B | 459.50x | $0.00 | 4.83% | 0.16x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
$7.25 | -- | $13.3B | 24.97x | $0.28 | 5.14% | 11.90x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
$12.68 | -- | $36.7B | 14.85x | $0.36 | 3.8% | 3.57x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
$6.06 | -- | $9.3B | 80.35x | $0.05 | 1.69% | 6.71x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
23.41% | 0.708 | -- | 0.58x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
36.58% | -2.040 | -- | 0.61x |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
67.32% | 1.234 | -- | 0.52x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
1.79% | 0.541 | -- | 6.16x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
16.81% | 0.586 | -- | 0.56x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
12.54% | -0.028 | -- | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.57% | -0.73% | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.46% | 0.68% | -- | -$181.1K |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.16% | 0.4% | -- | -- |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.14% | 2.17% | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.36% | 2.86% | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -1.43% | -1.64% | -- | -- |
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TIACF or KRYPY?
Kerry Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73% beat Kerry Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.-- -- $22.7B -
What do Analysts Say About TIACF or KRYPY?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties Ltd., analysts believe Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Kerry Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TIACF or KRYPY More Risky?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.151, which suggesting that the stock is 115.062% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.032, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.829%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIACF or KRYPY?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.7%. Kerry Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 6.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays 205.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties Ltd. pays out 207.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TIACF or KRYPY?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.18x while Kerry Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 44.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. is 0.65x versus 1.24x for Kerry Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.65x 3.18x -- -- KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.1.24x 44.74x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TIACF or PHKIF?
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73% beat Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.-- -- $16B -
What do Analysts Say About TIACF or PHKIF?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TIACF or PHKIF More Risky?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.151, which suggesting that the stock is 115.062% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.002, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.171%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIACF or PHKIF?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.7%. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 4.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays 205.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. pays out 40.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TIACF or PHKIF?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.18x while Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 459.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. is 0.65x versus 0.16x for Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.65x 3.18x -- -- PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.0.16x 459.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TIACF or SNLAY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73% beat Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B -
What do Analysts Say About TIACF or SNLAY?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sino Land Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sino Land Co. Ltd., analysts believe Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Sino Land Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TIACF or SNLAY More Risky?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.151, which suggesting that the stock is 115.062% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.313, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.748%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIACF or SNLAY?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.7%. Sino Land Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 5.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays 205.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays out 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TIACF or SNLAY?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.18x while Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. is 0.65x versus 11.90x for Sino Land Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.65x 3.18x -- -- SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.11.90x 24.97x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TIACF or SUHJY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B -
What do Analysts Say About TIACF or SUHJY?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd., analysts believe Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TIACF or SUHJY More Risky?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.151, which suggesting that the stock is 115.062% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.988%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIACF or SUHJY?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.7%. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays 205.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays out 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TIACF or SUHJY?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.18x while Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. is 0.65x versus 3.57x for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.65x 3.18x -- -- SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.3.57x 14.85x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TIACF or WARFY?
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73% beat The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.-- -- $20.4B -
What do Analysts Say About TIACF or WARFY?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd., analysts believe Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TIACF or WARFY More Risky?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.151, which suggesting that the stock is 115.062% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of 0.041, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.911%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TIACF or WARFY?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.7%. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays 205.22% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. pays out 46.8% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TIACF or WARFY?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.18x while The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. is 0.65x versus 6.71x for The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.65x 3.18x -- -- WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.6.71x 80.35x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
