Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
33
SIOPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.0253
Seasonality move
:
-3.86%
Day range:
$0.0253 - $0.0253
52-week range:
$0.0204 - $0.1100
Dividend yield:
813.65%
P/E ratio:
0.81x
P/S ratio:
0.02x
P/B ratio:
0.11x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
1.5K
1-year change:
-75.9%
Market cap:
$231.8M
Revenue:
$4B
EPS (TTM):
$0.03
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIOPF
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRYPF
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIOPF
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.0253 | -- | $231.8M | 0.81x | $0.00 | 813.65% | 0.02x |
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
$7.57 | -- | $16.5B | 9.36x | $0.16 | 4.67% | 0.70x |
|
KRYPF
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
$3.06 | -- | $4.4B | 36.87x | $0.05 | 5.67% | 1.71x |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
$0.26 | -- | $1B | 32.58x | $0.00 | 5.05% | 0.15x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
$16.83 | -- | $47.6B | 16.86x | $0.13 | 2.95% | 4.07x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
$0.57 | -- | $840.4M | 3.70x | $0.01 | 6.7% | 0.62x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIOPF
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.
|
103.12% | 1.320 | -- | 0.24x |
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
40.3% | 1.144 | -- | 0.47x |
|
KRYPF
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
36.58% | 1.428 | -- | 0.61x |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
67.32% | 0.087 | -- | 0.52x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
16.81% | 1.231 | -- | 0.56x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
23.41% | 0.823 | -- | 0.58x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SIOPF
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.13% | -66.84% | -- | -- |
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.47% | 5.72% | -- | -- |
|
KRYPF
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.46% | 0.68% | -- | -- |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.16% | 0.4% | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.36% | 2.86% | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.57% | -0.73% | -- | -- |
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SIOPF or CAOVY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -66.84% beat China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $38.7B CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.-- -- $90.3B -
What do Analysts Say About SIOPF or CAOVY?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd., analysts believe Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SIOPF or CAOVY More Risky?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -278.647, which suggesting that the stock is 27964.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a beta of -0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.501%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIOPF or CAOVY?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 813.65%. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. offers a yield of 4.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. pays out 32.91% of its earnings as a dividend. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIOPF or CAOVY?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.81x while China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.02x versus 0.70x for China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.0.02x 0.81x -- -- CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0.70x 9.36x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SIOPF or KRYPF?
Kerry Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -66.84% beat Kerry Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $38.7B KRYPFKerry Properties Ltd.-- -- $22.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SIOPF or KRYPF?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties Ltd., analysts believe Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Kerry Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 KRYPFKerry Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SIOPF or KRYPF More Risky?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -278.647, which suggesting that the stock is 27964.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.173, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.651%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIOPF or KRYPF?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 813.65%. Kerry Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 5.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties Ltd. pays out 208.13% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIOPF or KRYPF?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.81x while Kerry Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 36.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.02x versus 1.71x for Kerry Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.0.02x 0.81x -- -- KRYPFKerry Properties Ltd.1.71x 36.87x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SIOPF or PHKIF?
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -66.84% beat Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $38.7B PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.-- -- $16B -
What do Analysts Say About SIOPF or PHKIF?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SIOPF or PHKIF More Risky?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -278.647, which suggesting that the stock is 27964.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.933%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIOPF or PHKIF?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 813.65%. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. pays out 40.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIOPF or PHKIF?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.81x while Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 32.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.02x versus 0.15x for Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.0.02x 0.81x -- -- PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.0.15x 32.58x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SIOPF or SUHJY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -66.84% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $38.7B SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SIOPF or SUHJY?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd., analysts believe Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SIOPF or SUHJY More Risky?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -278.647, which suggesting that the stock is 27964.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.796%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIOPF or SUHJY?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 813.65%. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays out 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIOPF or SUHJY?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.81x while Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 16.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.02x versus 4.07x for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.0.02x 0.81x -- -- SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.4.07x 16.86x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SIOPF or TIACF?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -66.84% beat Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $38.7B TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SIOPF or TIACF?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd., analysts believe Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SIOPF or TIACF More Risky?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -278.647, which suggesting that the stock is 27964.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.806%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SIOPF or TIACF?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 813.65%. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 6.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays out 16.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SIOPF or TIACF?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 0.81x while Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.02x versus 0.62x for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.0.02x 0.81x -- -- TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.62x 3.70x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 5
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 5
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 5
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
