Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
49
SUHJY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$16.83
Seasonality move
:
-1.12%
Day range:
$16.70 - $16.91
52-week range:
$8.19 - $18.67
Dividend yield:
2.95%
P/E ratio:
16.86x
P/S ratio:
4.07x
P/B ratio:
0.45x
Volume:
60.6K
Avg. volume:
81.2K
1-year change:
75.4%
Market cap:
$47.6B
Revenue:
$10.3B
EPS (TTM):
$0.97
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRYPF
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SIOPF
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
$16.83 | -- | $47.6B | 16.86x | $0.13 | 2.95% | 4.07x |
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
$7.57 | -- | $16.5B | 9.36x | $0.16 | 4.67% | 0.70x |
|
KRYPF
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
$3.06 | -- | $4.4B | 36.87x | $0.05 | 5.67% | 1.71x |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
$0.26 | -- | $1B | 32.58x | $0.00 | 5.05% | 0.15x |
|
SIOPF
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.0253 | -- | $231.8M | 0.81x | $0.00 | 813.65% | 0.02x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
$0.57 | -- | $840.4M | 3.70x | $0.01 | 6.7% | 0.62x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
16.81% | 1.231 | -- | 0.56x |
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
40.3% | 1.144 | -- | 0.47x |
|
KRYPF
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
36.58% | 1.428 | -- | 0.61x |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
67.32% | 0.087 | -- | 0.52x |
|
SIOPF
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.
|
103.12% | 1.320 | -- | 0.24x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
23.41% | 0.823 | -- | 0.58x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.36% | 2.86% | -- | -- |
|
CAOVY
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.47% | 5.72% | -- | -- |
|
KRYPF
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.46% | 0.68% | -- | -- |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.16% | 0.4% | -- | -- |
|
SIOPF
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -10.13% | -66.84% | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.57% | -0.73% | -- | -- |
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SUHJY or CAOVY?
China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86% beat China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.-- -- $90.3B -
What do Analysts Say About SUHJY or CAOVY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd., analysts believe Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. is more attractive than China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SUHJY or CAOVY More Risky?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.796% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. has a beta of -0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.501%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUHJY or CAOVY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. offers a yield of 4.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. pays out 32.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUHJY or CAOVY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.86x while China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.'s PE ratio is 9.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. is 4.07x versus 0.70x for China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.4.07x 16.86x -- -- CAOVYChina Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.0.70x 9.36x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SUHJY or KRYPF?
Kerry Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86% beat Kerry Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B KRYPFKerry Properties Ltd.-- -- $22.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SUHJY or KRYPF?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties Ltd., analysts believe Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. is more attractive than Kerry Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 KRYPFKerry Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SUHJY or KRYPF More Risky?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.796% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.173, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.651%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUHJY or KRYPF?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Kerry Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 5.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties Ltd. pays out 208.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kerry Properties Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUHJY or KRYPF?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.86x while Kerry Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 36.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. is 4.07x versus 1.71x for Kerry Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.4.07x 16.86x -- -- KRYPFKerry Properties Ltd.1.71x 36.87x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SUHJY or PHKIF?
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86% beat Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.-- -- $16B -
What do Analysts Say About SUHJY or PHKIF?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has higher upside potential than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. is more attractive than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SUHJY or PHKIF More Risky?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.796% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.933%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUHJY or PHKIF?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. pays out 40.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUHJY or PHKIF?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.86x while Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 32.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. is 4.07x versus 0.15x for Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.4.07x 16.86x -- -- PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.0.15x 32.58x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SUHJY or SIOPF?
Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86% beat Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -66.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $38.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SUHJY or SIOPF?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has higher upside potential than Shimao Group Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. is more attractive than Shimao Group Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SUHJY or SIOPF More Risky?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.796% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of -278.647, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27964.73%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUHJY or SIOPF?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 813.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUHJY or SIOPF?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Shimao Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.86x while Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 0.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. is 4.07x versus 0.02x for Shimao Group Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.4.07x 16.86x -- -- SIOPFShimao Group Holdings Ltd.0.02x 0.81x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SUHJY or TIACF?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net margin of --. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86% beat Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SUHJY or TIACF?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd., analysts believe Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. is more attractive than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SUHJY or TIACF More Risky?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.452, which suggesting that the stock is 54.796% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.806%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUHJY or TIACF?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.95%. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 6.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays out 16.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUHJY or TIACF?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.86x while Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. is 4.07x versus 0.62x for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.4.07x 16.86x -- -- TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.62x 3.70x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
49
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 4
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 4
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 4
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
