KRYPY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Sino Land has a net margin of -- compared to Kerry Properties's net margin of --. Kerry Properties's return on equity of 1.92% beat Sino Land's return on equity of 2.67%.

Kerry Properties has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sino Land has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kerry Properties has higher upside potential than Sino Land, analysts believe Kerry Properties is more attractive than Sino Land.

Kerry Properties has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Land has a beta of 0.387, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.297%.

Kerry Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.11%. Sino Land offers a yield of 7.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Kerry Properties pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land pays out 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kerry Properties quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sino Land quarterly revenues of --. Kerry Properties's net income of -- is lower than Sino Land's net income of --. Notably, Kerry Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.78x while Sino Land's PE ratio is 14.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kerry Properties is 1.91x versus 7.60x for Sino Land. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sun Hung Kai Properties has a net margin of -- compared to Kerry Properties's net margin of --. Kerry Properties's return on equity of 1.92% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties's return on equity of 3.13%.

Kerry Properties has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kerry Properties has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties, analysts believe Kerry Properties is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties.

Kerry Properties has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.483%.

Kerry Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.11%. Sun Hung Kai Properties offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Kerry Properties pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties pays out 70.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kerry Properties quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties quarterly revenues of --. Kerry Properties's net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties's net income of --. Notably, Kerry Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.78x while Sun Hung Kai Properties's PE ratio is 11.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kerry Properties is 1.91x versus 3.01x for Sun Hung Kai Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tian An China Investments has a net margin of -- compared to Kerry Properties's net margin of --. Kerry Properties's return on equity of 1.92% beat Tian An China Investments's return on equity of 2.55%.

Kerry Properties has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kerry Properties has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments, analysts believe Kerry Properties is more attractive than Tian An China Investments.

Kerry Properties has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments has a beta of 0.144, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.563%.

Kerry Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.11%. Tian An China Investments offers a yield of 5.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Kerry Properties pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kerry Properties quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments quarterly revenues of --. Kerry Properties's net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments's net income of --. Notably, Kerry Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.78x while Tian An China Investments's PE ratio is 7.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kerry Properties is 1.91x versus 1.61x for Tian An China Investments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Wharf (Holdings) has a net margin of -- compared to Kerry Properties's net margin of --. Kerry Properties's return on equity of 1.92% beat The Wharf (Holdings)'s return on equity of -1.64%.

Kerry Properties has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kerry Properties has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings), analysts believe Kerry Properties is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings).

Kerry Properties has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.577% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) has a beta of 0.442, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.835%.

Kerry Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.11%. The Wharf (Holdings) offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Kerry Properties pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) pays out 129.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Wharf (Holdings)'s is not.

Kerry Properties quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) quarterly revenues of --. Kerry Properties's net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings)'s net income of --. Notably, Kerry Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.78x while The Wharf (Holdings)'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kerry Properties is 1.91x versus 3.68x for The Wharf (Holdings). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.