FUJHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Linkage Global, Inc. has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Subaru Corp.'s net margin of --. Subaru Corp.'s return on equity of 9.74% beat Linkage Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -42.09%.

Subaru Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Linkage Global, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Subaru Corp. has higher upside potential than Linkage Global, Inc., analysts believe Subaru Corp. is more attractive than Linkage Global, Inc..

Subaru Corp. has a beta of 0.325, which suggesting that the stock is 67.527% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linkage Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Subaru Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.86%. Linkage Global, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Subaru Corp. pays 25.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Linkage Global, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Subaru Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru Corp. quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than Linkage Global, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Subaru Corp.'s net income of $241.3M is higher than Linkage Global, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Subaru Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.97x while Linkage Global, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru Corp. is 0.49x versus 2.86x for Linkage Global, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Subaru Corp.'s net margin of --. Subaru Corp.'s return on equity of 9.74% beat MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Subaru Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.98 which suggests that it could grow by 132.99%. Given that MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Subaru Corp., analysts believe MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Subaru Corp..

Subaru Corp. has a beta of 0.325, which suggesting that the stock is 67.527% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Subaru Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.86%. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Subaru Corp. pays 25.11% of its earnings as a dividend. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Subaru Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru Corp. quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Subaru Corp.'s net income of $241.3M is higher than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Subaru Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.97x while MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 5.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru Corp. is 0.49x versus 0.26x for MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Subaru Corp.'s net margin of --. Subaru Corp.'s return on equity of 9.74% beat Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.49%.

Subaru Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Subaru Corp. has higher upside potential than Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd., analysts believe Subaru Corp. is more attractive than Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd..

Subaru Corp. has a beta of 0.325, which suggesting that the stock is 67.527% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Subaru Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.86%. Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Subaru Corp. pays 25.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Subaru Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru Corp. quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Subaru Corp.'s net income of $241.3M is higher than Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Subaru Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.97x while Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 2.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru Corp. is 0.49x versus 0.06x for Tokyo Lifestyle Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor Corp. has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Subaru Corp.'s net margin of 7.86%. Subaru Corp.'s return on equity of 9.74% beat Toyota Motor Corp.'s return on equity of 12.79%.

Subaru Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $230.64 which suggests that it could grow by 16.33%. Given that Toyota Motor Corp. has higher upside potential than Subaru Corp., analysts believe Toyota Motor Corp. is more attractive than Subaru Corp..

Subaru Corp. has a beta of 0.325, which suggesting that the stock is 67.527% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor Corp. has a beta of 0.670, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.019%.

Subaru Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.86%. Toyota Motor Corp. offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.87 per share. Subaru Corp. pays 25.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor Corp. pays out 22.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Subaru Corp. quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are smaller than Toyota Motor Corp. quarterly revenues of $83.9B. Subaru Corp.'s net income of $241.3M is lower than Toyota Motor Corp.'s net income of $6.6B. Notably, Subaru Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.97x while Toyota Motor Corp.'s PE ratio is 8.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Subaru Corp. is 0.49x versus 0.78x for Toyota Motor Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.