Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?
2025 was another banner year for the Magnificent Seven stocks,…
Buy
68
FRSHY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.50
Seasonality move
:
-2.78%
Day range:
$7.50 - $7.50
52-week range:
$4.16 - $7.50
Dividend yield:
2.57%
P/E ratio:
30.62x
P/S ratio:
0.23x
P/B ratio:
0.28x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
80.51%
Market cap:
$2B
Revenue:
$8.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.24
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FRSHY
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FRSHY
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.
|
$7.50 | -- | $2B | 30.62x | $0.19 | 2.57% | 0.23x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
$13.20 | -- | $3.8B | 47.24x | $0.26 | 6.58% | 1.31x |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
$0.28 | -- | $1.1B | 459.50x | $0.00 | 4.83% | 0.16x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
$6.94 | -- | $12.7B | 23.46x | $0.28 | 5.37% | 11.39x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
$13.33 | -- | $38.6B | 14.40x | $0.36 | 3.61% | 3.75x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
$0.57 | -- | $840.4M | 3.18x | $0.01 | 6.7% | 0.65x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FRSHY
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.
|
69.63% | -1.478 | -- | 0.58x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
36.58% | -1.831 | -- | 0.61x |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
67.32% | 1.305 | -- | 0.52x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
1.79% | 0.489 | -- | 6.16x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
16.81% | 0.439 | -- | 0.56x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
23.41% | 0.720 | -- | 0.58x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FRSHY
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.45% | 0.96% | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.46% | 0.68% | -- | -$181.1K |
|
PHKIF
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.16% | 0.4% | -- | -- |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.14% | 2.17% | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.36% | 2.86% | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.57% | -0.73% | -- | -- |
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FRSHY or KRYPY?
Kerry Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.96% beat Kerry Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.-- -- $31.7B KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.-- -- $22.7B -
What do Analysts Say About FRSHY or KRYPY?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties Ltd., analysts believe China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. is more attractive than Kerry Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.0 0 0 KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FRSHY or KRYPY More Risky?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.056, which suggesting that the stock is 94.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.030, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.004%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FRSHY or KRYPY?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Kerry Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 6.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. pays 42.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties Ltd. pays out 207.54% of its earnings as a dividend. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kerry Properties Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FRSHY or KRYPY?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.62x while Kerry Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 47.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. is 0.23x versus 1.31x for Kerry Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.0.23x 30.62x -- -- KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.1.31x 47.24x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FRSHY or PHKIF?
Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.96% beat Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.-- -- $31.7B PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.-- -- $16B -
What do Analysts Say About FRSHY or PHKIF?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd., analysts believe China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. is more attractive than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.0 0 0 PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FRSHY or PHKIF More Risky?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.056, which suggesting that the stock is 94.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. has a beta of -0.001, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.09%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FRSHY or PHKIF?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. offers a yield of 4.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. pays 42.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. pays out 40.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FRSHY or PHKIF?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.62x while Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.'s PE ratio is 459.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. is 0.23x versus 0.16x for Poly Property Group Co., Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.0.23x 30.62x -- -- PHKIFPoly Property Group Co., Ltd.0.16x 459.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FRSHY or SNLAY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.96% beat Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.-- -- $31.7B SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B -
What do Analysts Say About FRSHY or SNLAY?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sino Land Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sino Land Co. Ltd., analysts believe China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. is more attractive than Sino Land Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.0 0 0 SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FRSHY or SNLAY More Risky?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.056, which suggesting that the stock is 94.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.306, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.367%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FRSHY or SNLAY?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Sino Land Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 5.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. pays 42.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays out 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FRSHY or SNLAY?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.62x while Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. is 0.23x versus 11.39x for Sino Land Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.0.23x 30.62x -- -- SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.11.39x 23.46x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FRSHY or SUHJY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.96% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.-- -- $31.7B SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B -
What do Analysts Say About FRSHY or SUHJY?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd., analysts believe China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.0 0 0 SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FRSHY or SUHJY More Risky?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.056, which suggesting that the stock is 94.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.427, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.333%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FRSHY or SUHJY?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. pays 42.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays out 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FRSHY or SUHJY?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.62x while Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. is 0.23x versus 3.75x for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.0.23x 30.62x -- -- SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.3.75x 14.40x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FRSHY or TIACF?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.96% beat Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.-- -- $31.7B TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About FRSHY or TIACF?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd., analysts believe China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. is more attractive than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.0 0 0 TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is FRSHY or TIACF More Risky?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.056, which suggesting that the stock is 94.428% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.149, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.938%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FRSHY or TIACF?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 6.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. pays 42.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays out 205.22% of its earnings as a dividend. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FRSHY or TIACF?
China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 30.62x while Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd. is 0.23x versus 0.65x for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FRSHYChina Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd.0.23x 30.62x -- -- TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.65x 3.18x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Planet Labs Stock Rally So Much?
Satellite imaging startup Planet Labs (NYSE:PL), after years of disappointing…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
100
ATGL alert for Jan 10
Alpha Technology Group Ltd. [ATGL] is up 47.05% over the past day.
Buy
65
RGC alert for Jan 10
Regencell Bioscience Holdings Ltd. [RGC] is up 10.55% over the past day.
Sell
50
NAIL alert for Jan 10
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 18.52% over the past day.
