CTTAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jumia Technologies AG has a net margin of -18.99% compared to Continental AG's net margin of -39.31%. Continental AG's return on equity of -0.59% beat Jumia Technologies AG's return on equity of -102.57%.

Continental AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jumia Technologies AG has an analysts' consensus of $13.43 which suggests that it could grow by 16.58%. Given that Jumia Technologies AG has higher upside potential than Continental AG, analysts believe Jumia Technologies AG is more attractive than Continental AG.

Continental AG has a beta of 1.201, which suggesting that the stock is 20.111% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jumia Technologies AG has a beta of 2.284, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.405%.

Continental AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Jumia Technologies AG offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Continental AG pays 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Jumia Technologies AG pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Continental AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Continental AG quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are larger than Jumia Technologies AG quarterly revenues of $45.4M. Continental AG's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Jumia Technologies AG's net income of -$17.9M. Notably, Continental AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.83x while Jumia Technologies AG's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Continental AG is 0.57x versus 6.75x for Jumia Technologies AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LuxExperience BV has a net margin of -18.99% compared to Continental AG's net margin of -14.88%. Continental AG's return on equity of -0.59% beat LuxExperience BV's return on equity of 62.33%.

Continental AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LuxExperience BV has an analysts' consensus of $9.93 which suggests that it could grow by 2.05%. Given that LuxExperience BV has higher upside potential than Continental AG, analysts believe LuxExperience BV is more attractive than Continental AG.

Continental AG has a beta of 1.201, which suggesting that the stock is 20.111% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LuxExperience BV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Continental AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. LuxExperience BV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Continental AG pays 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. LuxExperience BV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Continental AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Continental AG quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are larger than LuxExperience BV quarterly revenues of $670.2M. Continental AG's net income of -$1.1B is lower than LuxExperience BV's net income of -$99.7M. Notably, Continental AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.83x while LuxExperience BV's PE ratio is 2.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Continental AG is 0.57x versus 0.58x for LuxExperience BV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Volkswagen AG has a net margin of -18.99% compared to Continental AG's net margin of -1.55%. Continental AG's return on equity of -0.59% beat Volkswagen AG's return on equity of 3.26%.

Continental AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Volkswagen AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Continental AG has higher upside potential than Volkswagen AG, analysts believe Continental AG is more attractive than Volkswagen AG.

Continental AG has a beta of 1.201, which suggesting that the stock is 20.111% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Volkswagen AG has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.674%.

Continental AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Volkswagen AG offers a yield of 5.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Continental AG pays 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Volkswagen AG pays out 19.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Continental AG quarterly revenues are $5.8B, which are smaller than Volkswagen AG quarterly revenues of $93.8B. Continental AG's net income of -$1.1B is higher than Volkswagen AG's net income of -$1.5B. Notably, Continental AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.83x while Volkswagen AG's PE ratio is 8.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Continental AG is 0.57x versus 0.17x for Volkswagen AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.