CRBJF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kerry Properties has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Land's net margin of --. China Resources Land's return on equity of 7.37% beat Kerry Properties's return on equity of 1.92%.

China Resources Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Land has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties, analysts believe China Resources Land is more attractive than Kerry Properties.

China Resources Land has a beta of 4,573.403, which suggesting that the stock is 457240.302% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.577%.

China Resources Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.12%. Kerry Properties offers a yield of 8.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. China Resources Land pays 33.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties pays out 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Resources Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Land's net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties's net income of --. Notably, China Resources Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Kerry Properties's PE ratio is 9.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Land is 0.57x versus 1.91x for Kerry Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sino Land has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Land's net margin of --. China Resources Land's return on equity of 7.37% beat Sino Land's return on equity of 2.67%.

China Resources Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sino Land has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Land has higher upside potential than Sino Land, analysts believe China Resources Land is more attractive than Sino Land.

China Resources Land has a beta of 4,573.403, which suggesting that the stock is 457240.302% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Land has a beta of 0.387, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.297%.

China Resources Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.12%. Sino Land offers a yield of 7.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. China Resources Land pays 33.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land pays out 21.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Resources Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sino Land quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Land's net income of -- is lower than Sino Land's net income of --. Notably, China Resources Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Sino Land's PE ratio is 14.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Land is 0.57x versus 7.60x for Sino Land. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sun Hung Kai Properties has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Land's net margin of --. China Resources Land's return on equity of 7.37% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties's return on equity of 3.13%.

China Resources Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Land has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties, analysts believe China Resources Land is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties.

China Resources Land has a beta of 4,573.403, which suggesting that the stock is 457240.302% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.483%.

China Resources Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.12%. Sun Hung Kai Properties offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. China Resources Land pays 33.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties pays out 70.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Resources Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Land's net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties's net income of --. Notably, China Resources Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Sun Hung Kai Properties's PE ratio is 11.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Land is 0.57x versus 3.01x for Sun Hung Kai Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yuexiu Property has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Land's net margin of --. China Resources Land's return on equity of 7.37% beat Yuexiu Property's return on equity of --.

China Resources Land has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Yuexiu Property has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Land has higher upside potential than Yuexiu Property, analysts believe China Resources Land is more attractive than Yuexiu Property.

China Resources Land has a beta of 4,573.403, which suggesting that the stock is 457240.302% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yuexiu Property has a beta of -10.509, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1150.928%.

China Resources Land has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.12%. Yuexiu Property offers a yield of 5.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. China Resources Land pays 33.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Yuexiu Property pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Land's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

China Resources Land quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Yuexiu Property quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Land's net income of -- is lower than Yuexiu Property's net income of --. Notably, China Resources Land's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Yuexiu Property's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Land is 0.57x versus -- for Yuexiu Property. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.