Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
32
CPCAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.22
Seasonality move
:
-1.79%
Day range:
$1.22 - $1.22
52-week range:
$0.98 - $1.55
Dividend yield:
7.26%
P/E ratio:
6.74x
P/S ratio:
0.61x
P/B ratio:
1.28x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
5.2K
1-year change:
4.27%
Market cap:
$7.9B
Revenue:
$13.4B
EPS (TTM):
$0.20
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CPCAF
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CPCAF
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.
|
$1.22 | -- | $7.9B | 6.74x | $0.03 | 7.26% | 0.61x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$0.48 | -- | $7.9M | 810.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.79x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
$1.10 | -- | $8.4M | 11.50x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.55x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.24 | -- | $5.7M | 80.00x | $0.05 | 9.68% | 0.77x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
$0.46 | -- | $9.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.09x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
$2.50 | -- | $148.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 21.75x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CPCAF
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.
|
41.92% | 0.693 | -- | 0.32x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
3.84% | -2.181 | 0.68% | 24.62x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | 1.418 | -- | 1.59x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
9.28% | 0.683 | 9.21% | 2.69x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
2.59% | 4.234 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | 4.699 | -- | 6.29x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CPCAF
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 10.51% | 18.03% | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$83.7K | -$1.5M | -138.51% | -140.31% | -66.75% | -$1.2M |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$527K | -$138K | 0.98% | 1.13% | -8.92% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CPCAF or CIIT?
Tianci International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s net margin of -67%. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s return on equity of 18.03% beat Tianci International, Inc.'s return on equity of -140.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.-- -- $11.3B CIITTianci International, Inc.3.68% -$0.09 $3.1M -
What do Analysts Say About CPCAF or CIIT?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tianci International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tianci International, Inc., analysts believe Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. is more attractive than Tianci International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.0 0 0 CIITTianci International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CPCAF or CIIT More Risky?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a beta of -0.022, which suggesting that the stock is 102.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tianci International, Inc. has a beta of -2.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 385.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPCAF or CIIT?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.26%. Tianci International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. pays 46.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Tianci International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CPCAF or CIIT?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tianci International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3M. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tianci International, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Tianci International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 810.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. is 0.61x versus 0.79x for Tianci International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.0.61x 6.74x -- -- CIITTianci International, Inc.0.79x 810.21x $2.3M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns CPCAF or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s net margin of --. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s return on equity of 18.03% beat Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.-- -- $11.3B CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CPCAF or CLWT?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd., analysts believe Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CPCAF or CLWT More Risky?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a beta of -0.022, which suggesting that the stock is 102.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.111%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPCAF or CLWT?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.26%. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. pays 46.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CPCAF or CLWT?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. is 0.61x versus 0.55x for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.0.61x 6.74x -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.55x 11.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CPCAF or HIHO?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s net margin of 3.69%. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s return on equity of 18.03% beat Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.-- -- $11.3B HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.34.07% $0.01 $7M -
What do Analysts Say About CPCAF or HIHO?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. is more attractive than Highway Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CPCAF or HIHO More Risky?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a beta of -0.022, which suggesting that the stock is 102.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.149%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPCAF or HIHO?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.26%. Highway Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 9.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. pays 46.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays out 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Highway Holdings Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CPCAF or HIHO?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $57K. Notably, Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Highway Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 80.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. is 0.61x versus 0.77x for Highway Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.0.61x 6.74x -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0.77x 80.00x $1.5M $57K
-
Which has Higher Returns CPCAF or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s net margin of --. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s return on equity of 18.03% beat Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.-- -- $11.3B ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CPCAF or ILAG?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CPCAF or ILAG More Risky?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a beta of -0.022, which suggesting that the stock is 102.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPCAF or ILAG?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.26%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. pays 46.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CPCAF or ILAG?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. is 0.61x versus 1.09x for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.0.61x 6.74x -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.1.09x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CPCAF or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s net margin of --. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s return on equity of 18.03% beat Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.-- -- $11.3B ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CPCAF or ROMA?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance Ltd., analysts believe Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. is more attractive than Roma Green Finance Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CPCAF or ROMA More Risky?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a beta of -0.022, which suggesting that the stock is 102.204% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CPCAF or ROMA?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.26%. Roma Green Finance Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. pays 46.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CPCAF or ROMA?
Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.74x while Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. is 0.61x versus 21.75x for Roma Green Finance Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CPCAFCathay Pacific Airways Ltd.0.61x 6.74x -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.21.75x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.2T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 4
Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.
