Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
40
CHKGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.73
Seasonality move
:
3.37%
Day range:
$4.73 - $4.73
52-week range:
$3.37 - $5.11
Dividend yield:
4.72%
P/E ratio:
11.36x
P/S ratio:
2.56x
P/B ratio:
0.31x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
447
1-year change:
12.89%
Market cap:
$16.6B
Revenue:
$6B
EPS (TTM):
$0.42
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHKGF
CK Asset Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHKGF
CK Asset Holdings Ltd.
|
$4.73 | -- | $16.6B | 11.36x | $0.05 | 4.72% | 2.56x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
$12.50 | -- | $3.6B | 44.74x | $0.26 | 6.95% | 1.24x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
$7.25 | -- | $13.3B | 24.97x | $0.28 | 5.14% | 11.90x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
$12.68 | -- | $36.7B | 14.85x | $0.36 | 3.8% | 3.57x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
$0.57 | -- | $840.4M | 3.18x | $0.01 | 6.7% | 0.65x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
$6.06 | -- | $9.3B | 80.35x | $0.05 | 1.69% | 6.71x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHKGF
CK Asset Holdings Ltd.
|
11.76% | 1.790 | -- | 1.12x |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
36.58% | -2.040 | -- | 0.61x |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
1.79% | 0.541 | -- | 6.16x |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
16.81% | 0.586 | -- | 0.56x |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
23.41% | 0.708 | -- | 0.58x |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
12.54% | -0.028 | -- | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHKGF
CK Asset Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 3.07% | 3.48% | -- | -- |
|
KRYPY
Kerry Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 0.46% | 0.68% | -- | -$181.1K |
|
SNLAY
Sino Land Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.14% | 2.17% | -- | -- |
|
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.36% | 2.86% | -- | -- |
|
TIACF
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -0.57% | -0.73% | -- | -- |
|
WARFY
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -1.43% | -1.64% | -- | -- |
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CHKGF or KRYPY?
Kerry Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat Kerry Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 0.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.-- -- $58.3B KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.-- -- $22.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CHKGF or KRYPY?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kerry Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kerry Properties Ltd., analysts believe CK Asset Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Kerry Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHKGF or KRYPY More Risky?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.391, which suggesting that the stock is 60.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kerry Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.032, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.829%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHKGF or KRYPY?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Kerry Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 6.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. CK Asset Holdings Ltd. pays 44.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Kerry Properties Ltd. pays out 207.54% of its earnings as a dividend. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kerry Properties Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHKGF or KRYPY?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kerry Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kerry Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.36x while Kerry Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 44.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CK Asset Holdings Ltd. is 2.56x versus 1.24x for Kerry Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.2.56x 11.36x -- -- KRYPYKerry Properties Ltd.1.24x 44.74x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHKGF or SNLAY?
Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.-- -- $58.3B SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.-- -- $21.9B -
What do Analysts Say About CHKGF or SNLAY?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sino Land Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sino Land Co. Ltd., analysts believe CK Asset Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Sino Land Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHKGF or SNLAY More Risky?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.391, which suggesting that the stock is 60.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sino Land Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.313, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.748%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHKGF or SNLAY?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Sino Land Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 5.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. CK Asset Holdings Ltd. pays 44.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Sino Land Co. Ltd. pays out 114.87% of its earnings as a dividend. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHKGF or SNLAY?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sino Land Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.36x while Sino Land Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CK Asset Holdings Ltd. is 2.56x versus 11.90x for Sino Land Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.2.56x 11.36x -- -- SNLAYSino Land Co. Ltd.11.90x 24.97x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHKGF or SUHJY?
Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s return on equity of 2.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.-- -- $58.3B SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.-- -- $94.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CHKGF or SUHJY?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd., analysts believe CK Asset Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHKGF or SUHJY More Risky?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.391, which suggesting that the stock is 60.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.988%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHKGF or SUHJY?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. CK Asset Holdings Ltd. pays 44.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. pays out 51.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHKGF or SUHJY?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.36x while Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CK Asset Holdings Ltd. is 2.56x versus 3.57x for Sun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.2.56x 11.36x -- -- SUHJYSun Hung Kai Properties Ltd.3.57x 14.85x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHKGF or TIACF?
Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of -0.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.-- -- $58.3B TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.-- -- $4.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CHKGF or TIACF?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd., analysts believe CK Asset Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHKGF or TIACF More Risky?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.391, which suggesting that the stock is 60.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.062%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHKGF or TIACF?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 6.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. CK Asset Holdings Ltd. pays 44.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. pays out 205.22% of its earnings as a dividend. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHKGF or TIACF?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.36x while Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 3.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CK Asset Holdings Ltd. is 2.56x versus 0.65x for Tian An China Investments Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.2.56x 11.36x -- -- TIACFTian An China Investments Co. Ltd.0.65x 3.18x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHKGF or WARFY?
The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s return on equity of -1.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.-- -- $58.3B WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.-- -- $20.4B -
What do Analysts Say About CHKGF or WARFY?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd., analysts believe CK Asset Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHKGF or WARFY More Risky?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.391, which suggesting that the stock is 60.878% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. has a beta of 0.041, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.911%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHKGF or WARFY?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.72%. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. CK Asset Holdings Ltd. pays 44.78% of its earnings as a dividend. The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. pays out 46.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHKGF or WARFY?
CK Asset Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, CK Asset Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.36x while The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 80.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CK Asset Holdings Ltd. is 2.56x versus 6.71x for The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHKGFCK Asset Holdings Ltd.2.56x 11.36x -- -- WARFYThe Wharf (Holdings) Ltd.6.71x 80.35x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 59.64% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 9.18% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.19% over the past day.
