Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
39
CHFFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.67
Seasonality move
:
-1.85%
Day range:
$0.67 - $0.67
52-week range:
$0.43 - $0.67
Dividend yield:
4.62%
P/E ratio:
10.19x
P/S ratio:
1.10x
P/B ratio:
0.41x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
3.6K
1-year change:
43.32%
Market cap:
$4.1B
Revenue:
$3.9B
EPS (TTM):
$0.07
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHFFF
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHFFF
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.
|
$0.67 | -- | $4.1B | 10.19x | $0.02 | 4.62% | 1.10x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$0.36 | -- | $8.9M | 810.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.56x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
$1.23 | -- | $9.4M | 11.50x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.62x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.66 | -- | $7.6M | 75.33x | $0.05 | 0% | 1.21x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
$5.24 | -- | $108.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 18.65x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
$1.82 | -- | $108.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 32.99x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHFFF
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.
|
62.5% | 0.614 | -- | 1.31x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
3.68% | -2.181 | 1.05% | 5.03x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | 1.418 | -- | 1.59x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
7.57% | 0.683 | 7.57% | 2.98x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
2.59% | 4.234 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | 4.699 | -- | 6.29x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CHFFF
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 2.11% | 5.07% | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$384.3K | -$268.8K | -122.09% | -124.48% | -7.04% | -$727.4K |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$301K | -$542K | -7.38% | -8.32% | -45.93% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CHFFF or CIIT?
Tianci International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s net margin of -7.04%. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.07% beat Tianci International, Inc.'s return on equity of -124.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.-- -- $20.4B CIITTianci International, Inc.10.07% -$0.02 $2.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CHFFF or CIIT?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tianci International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tianci International, Inc., analysts believe China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. is more attractive than Tianci International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.0 0 0 CIITTianci International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CHFFF or CIIT More Risky?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tianci International, Inc. has a beta of -2.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 385.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFFF or CIIT?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Tianci International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. pays 41.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Tianci International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFFF or CIIT?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tianci International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.8M. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tianci International, Inc.'s net income of -$268.9K. Notably, China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.19x while Tianci International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 810.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. is 1.10x versus 0.56x for Tianci International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.1.10x 10.19x -- -- CIITTianci International, Inc.0.56x 810.21x $3.8M -$268.9K
-
Which has Higher Returns CHFFF or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.07% beat Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.-- -- $20.4B CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CHFFF or CLWT?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd., analysts believe China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHFFF or CLWT More Risky?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.111%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFFF or CLWT?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. pays 41.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFFF or CLWT?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.19x while Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. is 1.10x versus 0.62x for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.1.10x 10.19x -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.62x 11.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHFFF or HIHO?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s net margin of -31.53%. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.07% beat Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of -8.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.-- -- $20.4B HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.25.51% -$0.08 $6.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CHFFF or HIHO?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings Ltd., analysts believe China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. is more attractive than Highway Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHFFF or HIHO More Risky?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.149%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFFF or HIHO?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Highway Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. pays 41.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays out 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Highway Holdings Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFFF or HIHO?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.2M. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -$372K. Notably, China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.19x while Highway Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 75.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. is 1.10x versus 1.21x for Highway Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.1.10x 10.19x -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.1.21x 75.33x $1.2M -$372K
-
Which has Higher Returns CHFFF or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.07% beat Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.-- -- $20.4B ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CHFFF or ILAG?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CHFFF or ILAG More Risky?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFFF or ILAG?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. pays 41.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFFF or ILAG?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.19x while Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. is 1.10x versus 18.65x for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.1.10x 10.19x -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.18.65x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CHFFF or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.07% beat Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.-- -- $20.4B ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CHFFF or ROMA?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance Ltd., analysts believe China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. is more attractive than Roma Green Finance Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CHFFF or ROMA More Risky?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 89.544% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CHFFF or ROMA?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.62%. Roma Green Finance Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. pays 41.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CHFFF or ROMA?
China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Everbright Environment Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.19x while Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Everbright Environment Group Ltd. is 1.10x versus 32.99x for Roma Green Finance Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CHFFFChina Everbright Environment Group Ltd.1.10x 10.19x -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.32.99x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 64x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
14
SMX alert for Dec 30
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 40.26% over the past day.
Buy
71
ZCSH alert for Dec 30
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) [ZCSH] is down 4.56% over the past day.
Buy
69
GDXU alert for Dec 30
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 3.19% over the past day.
