Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
46
CEGHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.42
Seasonality move
:
14.29%
Day range:
$0.42 - $0.42
52-week range:
$0.41 - $1.00
Dividend yield:
9.82%
P/E ratio:
8.30x
P/S ratio:
1.10x
P/B ratio:
0.51x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-58.5%
Market cap:
$1.2B
Revenue:
$1B
EPS (TTM):
$0.05
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEGHF
China Education Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$1.2M | -$1.17 | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEGHF
China Education Group Holdings Ltd.
|
$0.42 | -- | $1.2B | 8.30x | $0.01 | 9.82% | 1.10x |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
$7.00 | -- | $11.4B | 14.15x | $0.13 | 3.31% | 2.11x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$2.52 | -- | $762M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.04x |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
$10.39 | -- | $238.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
$1.72 | -- | $81.9M | 7.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.00x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
$6.01 | -- | $3.7M | 34.34x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.47x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEGHF
China Education Group Holdings Ltd.
|
37.33% | -0.814 | -- | 0.62x |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
6.35% | -1.213 | -- | 0.22x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
803% | -1.323 | 5.79% | 0.27x |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -6.504 | -- | 1.89x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | 0.872 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CEGHF
China Education Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 1.05% | 1.62% | -- | -- |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 12.39% | 13.4% | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
-$146.2K | -$1.5M | -594.71% | -645.4% | -403.83% | -$1.3M |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 37.42% | 37.42% | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CEGHF or CRHKY?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.62% beat China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $4B CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.-- -- $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About CEGHF or CRHKY?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd., analysts believe China Education Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CEGHF or CRHKY More Risky?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.016, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.562%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEGHF or CRHKY?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.82%. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. China Education Group Holdings Ltd. pays -48.41% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. pays out 44.02% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEGHF or CRHKY?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.30x while China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Education Group Holdings Ltd. is 1.10x versus 2.11x for China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.1.10x 8.30x -- -- CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.2.11x 14.15x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CEGHF or IMG?
CIMG, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -392.54%. China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.62% beat CIMG, Inc.'s return on equity of -645.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $4B IMGCIMG, Inc.-39.85% -$0.92 $27.5K -
What do Analysts Say About CEGHF or IMG?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIMG, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6249.21%. Given that CIMG, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Education Group Holdings Ltd., analysts believe CIMG, Inc. is more attractive than China Education Group Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 IMGCIMG, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CEGHF or IMG More Risky?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIMG, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.154%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEGHF or IMG?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.82%. CIMG, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Education Group Holdings Ltd. pays -48.41% of its earnings as a dividend. CIMG, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEGHF or IMG?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIMG, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9K. China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CIMG, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.30x while CIMG, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Education Group Holdings Ltd. is 1.10x versus 5.04x for CIMG, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.1.10x 8.30x -- -- IMGCIMG, Inc.5.04x -- $366.9K -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CEGHF or PTNM?
Pitanium Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.62% beat Pitanium Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $4B PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CEGHF or PTNM?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pitanium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pitanium Ltd., analysts believe China Education Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Pitanium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 PTNMPitanium Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CEGHF or PTNM More Risky?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pitanium Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEGHF or PTNM?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.82%. Pitanium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Education Group Holdings Ltd. pays -48.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Pitanium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEGHF or PTNM?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pitanium Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Pitanium Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.30x while Pitanium Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Education Group Holdings Ltd. is 1.10x versus -- for Pitanium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.1.10x 8.30x -- -- PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CEGHF or RAY?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.62% beat Raytech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 37.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $4B RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.-- -- $4M -
What do Analysts Say About CEGHF or RAY?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Raytech Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Raytech Holding Ltd., analysts believe China Education Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Raytech Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CEGHF or RAY More Risky?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Raytech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEGHF or RAY?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.82%. Raytech Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Education Group Holdings Ltd. pays -48.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Raytech Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEGHF or RAY?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Raytech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.30x while Raytech Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Education Group Holdings Ltd. is 1.10x versus 3.00x for Raytech Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.1.10x 8.30x -- -- RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.3.00x 7.95x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CEGHF or TWG?
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.62% beat Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $4B TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CEGHF or TWG?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe China Education Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CEGHF or TWG More Risky?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CEGHF or TWG?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.82%. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Education Group Holdings Ltd. pays -48.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CEGHF or TWG?
China Education Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Education Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 8.30x while Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 34.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Education Group Holdings Ltd. is 1.10x versus 6.47x for Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CEGHFChina Education Group Holdings Ltd.1.10x 8.30x -- -- TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.6.47x 34.34x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
50
TGL alert for Dec 8
Treasure Global, Inc. [TGL] is up 2.71% over the past day.
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 47.86% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 10.37% over the past day.
