Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
13
CRHKY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.00
Seasonality move
:
-0.38%
Day range:
$6.97 - $7.04
52-week range:
$5.76 - $7.75
Dividend yield:
3.31%
P/E ratio:
14.15x
P/S ratio:
2.11x
P/B ratio:
1.80x
Volume:
60.3K
Avg. volume:
34.6K
1-year change:
6.71%
Market cap:
$11.4B
Revenue:
$5.4B
EPS (TTM):
$0.49
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.
|
$1.6B | -- | 21.61% | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$1.2M | -$1.17 | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
$7.00 | -- | $11.4B | 14.15x | $0.13 | 3.31% | 2.11x |
|
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.
|
$1.11 | -- | $14.6B | 24.74x | $0.06 | 5.08% | 2.45x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$2.52 | -- | $762M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.04x |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
$10.39 | -- | $238.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
$1.72 | -- | $81.9M | 7.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.00x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
$6.01 | -- | $3.7M | 34.34x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.47x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
6.35% | -1.213 | -- | 0.22x |
|
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.
|
2.89% | -1.840 | -- | 0.83x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
803% | -1.323 | 5.79% | 0.27x |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -6.504 | -- | 1.89x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | 0.872 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 12.39% | 13.4% | -- | -- |
|
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.
|
$745M | $331M | 5.63% | 5.75% | 22.66% | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
-$146.2K | -$1.5M | -594.71% | -645.4% | -403.83% | -$1.3M |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 37.42% | 37.42% | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CRHKY or BDWBF?
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net margin of 16.02%. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.4% beat Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.-- -- $5.2B BDWBFBudweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.50.99% $0.02 $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About CRHKY or BDWBF?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.0 0 0 BDWBFBudweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRHKY or BDWBF More Risky?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. has a beta of -0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.169%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRHKY or BDWBF?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. pays 44.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. pays out 102.43% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRHKY or BDWBF?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.'s net income of $234M. Notably, China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.15x while Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. is 2.11x versus 2.45x for Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.2.11x 14.15x -- -- BDWBFBudweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.2.45x 24.74x $1.5B $234M
-
Which has Higher Returns CRHKY or IMG?
CIMG, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net margin of -392.54%. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.4% beat CIMG, Inc.'s return on equity of -645.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.-- -- $5.2B IMGCIMG, Inc.-39.85% -$0.92 $27.5K -
What do Analysts Say About CRHKY or IMG?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIMG, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6249.21%. Given that CIMG, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd., analysts believe CIMG, Inc. is more attractive than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.0 0 0 IMGCIMG, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is CRHKY or IMG More Risky?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIMG, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.154%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRHKY or IMG?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. CIMG, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. pays 44.02% of its earnings as a dividend. CIMG, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRHKY or IMG?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIMG, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9K. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CIMG, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.15x while CIMG, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. is 2.11x versus 5.04x for CIMG, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.2.11x 14.15x -- -- IMGCIMG, Inc.5.04x -- $366.9K -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns CRHKY or PTNM?
Pitanium Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.4% beat Pitanium Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.-- -- $5.2B PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CRHKY or PTNM?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pitanium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pitanium Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Pitanium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.0 0 0 PTNMPitanium Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRHKY or PTNM More Risky?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pitanium Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRHKY or PTNM?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Pitanium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. pays 44.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Pitanium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRHKY or PTNM?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pitanium Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Pitanium Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.15x while Pitanium Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. is 2.11x versus -- for Pitanium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.2.11x 14.15x -- -- PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CRHKY or RAY?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.4% beat Raytech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 37.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.-- -- $5.2B RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.-- -- $4M -
What do Analysts Say About CRHKY or RAY?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Raytech Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Raytech Holding Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Raytech Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.0 0 0 RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRHKY or RAY More Risky?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Raytech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRHKY or RAY?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Raytech Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. pays 44.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Raytech Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRHKY or RAY?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Raytech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.15x while Raytech Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. is 2.11x versus 3.00x for Raytech Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.2.11x 14.15x -- -- RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.3.00x 7.95x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CRHKY or TWG?
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.4% beat Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.-- -- $5.2B TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CRHKY or TWG?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. is more attractive than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.0 0 0 TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CRHKY or TWG More Risky?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.562% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CRHKY or TWG?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. pays 44.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CRHKY or TWG?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 14.15x while Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 34.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. is 2.11x versus 6.47x for Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.2.11x 14.15x -- -- TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.6.47x 34.34x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 59.94% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 6.97% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.78% over the past day.
