IMG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Foods Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong) has a net margin of -392.54% compared to CIMG, Inc.'s net margin of -81.82%. CIMG, Inc.'s return on equity of -645.4% beat China Foods Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong)'s return on equity of --.

CIMG, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6249.21%. On the other hand China Foods Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CIMG, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Foods Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong), analysts believe CIMG, Inc. is more attractive than China Foods Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong).

CIMG, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, which suggesting that the stock is 4.154% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Foods Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong) has a beta of -0.242, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.216%.

CIMG, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Foods Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CIMG, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Foods Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CIMG, Inc. quarterly revenues are $366.9K, which are larger than China Foods Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong) quarterly revenues of $96.8K. CIMG, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than China Foods Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong)'s net income of -$79.2K. Notably, CIMG, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Foods Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong)'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CIMG, Inc. is 5.04x versus 31.84x for China Foods Holdings Ltd. (Hong Kong). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Pharmatech, Inc. has a net margin of -392.54% compared to CIMG, Inc.'s net margin of --. CIMG, Inc.'s return on equity of -645.4% beat Global Pharmatech, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

CIMG, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6249.21%. On the other hand Global Pharmatech, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CIMG, Inc. has higher upside potential than Global Pharmatech, Inc., analysts believe CIMG, Inc. is more attractive than Global Pharmatech, Inc..

CIMG, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, which suggesting that the stock is 4.154% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Pharmatech, Inc. has a beta of 0.201, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.923%.

CIMG, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Pharmatech, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CIMG, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Pharmatech, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CIMG, Inc. quarterly revenues are $366.9K, which are larger than Global Pharmatech, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. CIMG, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M is higher than Global Pharmatech, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, CIMG, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global Pharmatech, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CIMG, Inc. is 5.04x versus 65.21x for Global Pharmatech, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a net margin of -392.54% compared to CIMG, Inc.'s net margin of -3.52%. CIMG, Inc.'s return on equity of -645.4% beat Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s return on equity of -43.51%.

CIMG, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6249.21%. On the other hand Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 244.47%. Given that CIMG, Inc. has higher upside potential than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp., analysts believe CIMG, Inc. is more attractive than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp..

CIMG, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, which suggesting that the stock is 4.154% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CIMG, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CIMG, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CIMG, Inc. quarterly revenues are $366.9K, which are smaller than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.3M. CIMG, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s net income of -$712.4K. Notably, CIMG, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CIMG, Inc. is 5.04x versus 0.05x for Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a net margin of -392.54% compared to CIMG, Inc.'s net margin of -7.56%. CIMG, Inc.'s return on equity of -645.4% beat Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38%.

CIMG, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6249.21%. On the other hand Laird Superfood, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $9.67 which suggests that it could grow by 307.88%. Given that CIMG, Inc. has higher upside potential than Laird Superfood, Inc., analysts believe CIMG, Inc. is more attractive than Laird Superfood, Inc..

CIMG, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, which suggesting that the stock is 4.154% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.351, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.079%.

CIMG, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Laird Superfood, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CIMG, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CIMG, Inc. quarterly revenues are $366.9K, which are smaller than Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues of $12.9M. CIMG, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M is lower than Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K. Notably, CIMG, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Laird Superfood, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CIMG, Inc. is 5.04x versus 0.51x for Laird Superfood, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.