LSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Better Choice has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 13.42%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 107.01%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 488.24%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Laird Superfood, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Laird Superfood.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 0.543, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.729%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is lower than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.44x versus 0.06x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 32.41%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.57%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 107.01%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $32.63 which suggests that it could grow by 7.91%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.734%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6.6B. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 13.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.44x versus 1.43x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lifevantage has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 3.76%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat Lifevantage's return on equity of 26.66%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 107.01%. On the other hand Lifevantage has an analysts' consensus of $32.50 which suggests that it could grow by 125.38%. Given that Lifevantage has higher upside potential than Laird Superfood, analysts believe Lifevantage is more attractive than Laird Superfood.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lifevantage has a beta of 0.741, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.934%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lifevantage offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lifevantage pays out 236.3% of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are smaller than Lifevantage quarterly revenues of $67.8M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is lower than Lifevantage's net income of $2.6M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lifevantage's PE ratio is 25.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.44x versus 0.88x for Lifevantage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Post Holdings has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 5.74%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 107.01%. On the other hand Post Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $128.70 which suggests that it could grow by 11.82%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Post Holdings has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.835%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Post Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Post Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are smaller than Post Holdings quarterly revenues of $2B. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is lower than Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Post Holdings's PE ratio is 18.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.44x versus 0.96x for Post Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.