LSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridgford Foods Corp. has a net margin of -7.56% compared to Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net margin of -3.15%. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38% beat Bridgford Foods Corp.'s return on equity of -5.79%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.67, signalling upside risk potential of 262.05%. On the other hand Bridgford Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Laird Superfood, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bridgford Foods Corp., analysts believe Laird Superfood, Inc. is more attractive than Bridgford Foods Corp..

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.172, which suggesting that the stock is 117.245% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridgford Foods Corp. has a beta of -0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 120.644%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bridgford Foods Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridgford Foods Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Bridgford Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $52M. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K is higher than Bridgford Foods Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bridgford Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 62.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood, Inc. is 0.58x versus 0.30x for Bridgford Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a net margin of -7.56% compared to Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net margin of -3.52%. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38% beat Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s return on equity of -43.51%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.67, signalling upside risk potential of 262.05%. On the other hand Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 225.73%. Given that Laird Superfood, Inc. has higher upside potential than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp., analysts believe Laird Superfood, Inc. is more attractive than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp..

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.172, which suggesting that the stock is 117.245% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.3M. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K is lower than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s net income of -$712.4K. Notably, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood, Inc. is 0.58x versus 0.05x for Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz Co. has a net margin of -7.56% compared to Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net margin of 9.83%. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38% beat The Kraft Heinz Co.'s return on equity of -9.47%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.67, signalling upside risk potential of 262.05%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz Co. has an analysts' consensus of $27.13 which suggests that it could grow by 9.18%. Given that Laird Superfood, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz Co., analysts believe Laird Superfood, Inc. is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz Co..

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.172, which suggesting that the stock is 117.245% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz Co. has a beta of 0.162, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.774%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz Co. offers a yield of 6.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz Co. pays out 70.85% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz Co. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K is lower than The Kraft Heinz Co.'s net income of $613M. Notably, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Kraft Heinz Co.'s PE ratio is 13.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood, Inc. is 0.58x versus 1.18x for The Kraft Heinz Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Post Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -7.56% compared to Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net margin of 5.48%. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38% beat Post Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.25%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.67, signalling upside risk potential of 262.05%. On the other hand Post Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $126.56 which suggests that it could grow by 18.61%. Given that Laird Superfood, Inc. has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Laird Superfood, Inc. is more attractive than Post Holdings, Inc..

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.172, which suggesting that the stock is 117.245% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Post Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.491, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.922%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Post Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Post Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Post Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2B. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K is lower than Post Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $108.7M. Notably, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Post Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood, Inc. is 0.58x versus 0.86x for Post Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.