LSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Better Choice has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 13.42%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat Better Choice's return on equity of -199.75%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 84.4%. On the other hand Better Choice has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1786.79%. Given that Better Choice has higher upside potential than Laird Superfood, analysts believe Better Choice is more attractive than Laird Superfood.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Better Choice has a beta of 1.023, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.32%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Better Choice offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Better Choice pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are larger than Better Choice quarterly revenues of $11.4M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is lower than Better Choice's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Better Choice's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.62x versus 0.02x for Better Choice. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthy Choice Wellness has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of -14.58%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat Healthy Choice Wellness's return on equity of -80.93%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 84.4%. On the other hand Healthy Choice Wellness has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 426.32%. Given that Healthy Choice Wellness has higher upside potential than Laird Superfood, analysts believe Healthy Choice Wellness is more attractive than Laird Superfood.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthy Choice Wellness has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthy Choice Wellness offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthy Choice Wellness pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are smaller than Healthy Choice Wellness quarterly revenues of $18.2M. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is higher than Healthy Choice Wellness's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Healthy Choice Wellness's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.62x versus 0.05x for Healthy Choice Wellness. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 11.87%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 84.4%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.56 which suggests that it could grow by 10.78%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than The Kraft Heinz, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than The Kraft Heinz.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.301, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.853%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 5.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 13.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.62x versus 1.36x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Post Holdings has a net margin of -3.43% compared to Laird Superfood's net margin of 5.74%. Laird Superfood's return on equity of -14.01% beat Post Holdings's return on equity of 9.85%.

Laird Superfood has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 84.4%. On the other hand Post Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $127.28 which suggests that it could grow by 14.81%. Given that Laird Superfood has higher upside potential than Post Holdings, analysts believe Laird Superfood is more attractive than Post Holdings.

Laird Superfood has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Post Holdings has a beta of 0.494, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.606%.

Laird Superfood has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Post Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Post Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood quarterly revenues are $11.6M, which are smaller than Post Holdings quarterly revenues of $2B. Laird Superfood's net income of -$398.4K is lower than Post Holdings's net income of $113.3M. Notably, Laird Superfood's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Post Holdings's PE ratio is 18.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood is 1.62x versus 0.93x for Post Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.