LSF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bridgford Foods Corp. has a net margin of -7.56% compared to Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net margin of -3.15%. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38% beat Bridgford Foods Corp.'s return on equity of -5.79%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.67, signalling upside risk potential of 254.94%. On the other hand Bridgford Foods Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Laird Superfood, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bridgford Foods Corp., analysts believe Laird Superfood, Inc. is more attractive than Bridgford Foods Corp..

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.351, which suggesting that the stock is 135.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bridgford Foods Corp. has a beta of -0.249, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.925%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bridgford Foods Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bridgford Foods Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Bridgford Foods Corp. quarterly revenues of $52M. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K is higher than Bridgford Foods Corp.'s net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bridgford Foods Corp.'s PE ratio is 62.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood, Inc. is 0.47x versus 0.29x for Bridgford Foods Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a net margin of -7.56% compared to Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net margin of -5.61%. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38% beat The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -78.55%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.67, signalling upside risk potential of 254.94%. On the other hand The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.41 which suggests that it could grow by 111.73%. Given that Laird Superfood, Inc. has higher upside potential than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., analysts believe Laird Superfood, Inc. is more attractive than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc..

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.351, which suggesting that the stock is 135.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.35%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $367.9M. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K is higher than The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s net income of -$20.6M. Notably, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood, Inc. is 0.47x versus 0.07x for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a net margin of -7.56% compared to Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net margin of -3.52%. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38% beat Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s return on equity of -43.51%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.67, signalling upside risk potential of 254.94%. On the other hand Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 604.23%. Given that Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has higher upside potential than Laird Superfood, Inc., analysts believe Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. is more attractive than Laird Superfood, Inc..

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.351, which suggesting that the stock is 135.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp. quarterly revenues of $20.3M. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K is lower than Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s net income of -$712.4K. Notably, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood, Inc. is 0.47x versus 0.05x for Healthy Choice Wellness Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. has a net margin of -7.56% compared to Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net margin of 4.31%. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.38% beat Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.26%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a consensus price target of $7.67, signalling upside risk potential of 254.94%. On the other hand Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 2.88%. Given that Laird Superfood, Inc. has higher upside potential than Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc., analysts believe Laird Superfood, Inc. is more attractive than Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc..

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a beta of 2.351, which suggesting that the stock is 135.079% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.309%.

Laird Superfood, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Laird Superfood, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Laird Superfood, Inc. quarterly revenues are $12.9M, which are smaller than Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc. quarterly revenues of $128.3M. Laird Superfood, Inc.'s net income of -$975.1K is lower than Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.'s net income of $5.5M. Notably, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Laird Superfood, Inc. is 0.47x versus 0.86x for Nature's Sunshine Products, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.