Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
10
RAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.69
Seasonality move
:
-28.49%
Day range:
$1.68 - $1.73
52-week range:
$1.40 - $58.88
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
7.95x
P/S ratio:
3.00x
P/B ratio:
12.43x
Volume:
11.9K
Avg. volume:
389.5K
1-year change:
-91.73%
Market cap:
$81.9M
Revenue:
$10.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.07
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.
|
$1.6B | -- | 21.61% | -- | -- |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$1.2M | -$1.17 | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
$1.72 | -- | $81.9M | 7.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.00x |
|
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.
|
$1.11 | -- | $14.6B | 24.74x | $0.06 | 5.08% | 2.45x |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
$7.00 | -- | $11.4B | 14.15x | $0.13 | 3.31% | 2.11x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$2.52 | -- | $762M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.04x |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
$10.39 | -- | $238.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
$6.01 | -- | $3.7M | 34.34x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.47x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -6.504 | -- | 1.89x |
|
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.
|
2.89% | -1.840 | -- | 0.83x |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
6.35% | -1.213 | -- | 0.22x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
803% | -1.323 | 5.79% | 0.27x |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | 0.872 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 37.42% | 37.42% | -- | -- |
|
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.
|
$745M | $331M | 5.63% | 5.75% | 22.66% | -- |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 12.39% | 13.4% | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
-$146.2K | -$1.5M | -594.71% | -645.4% | -403.83% | -$1.3M |
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Raytech Holding Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RAY or BDWBF?
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of 16.02%. Raytech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 37.42% beat Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.-- -- $4M BDWBFBudweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.50.99% $0.02 $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About RAY or BDWBF?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Raytech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd., analysts believe Raytech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0 0 0 BDWBFBudweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RAY or BDWBF More Risky?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. has a beta of -0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.169%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RAY or BDWBF?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Raytech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. pays out 102.43% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RAY or BDWBF?
Raytech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.'s net income of $234M. Notably, Raytech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.95x while Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raytech Holding Ltd. is 3.00x versus 2.45x for Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.3.00x 7.95x -- -- BDWBFBudweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.2.45x 24.74x $1.5B $234M
-
Which has Higher Returns RAY or CRHKY?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. Raytech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 37.42% beat China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.-- -- $4M CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.-- -- $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About RAY or CRHKY?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Raytech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd., analysts believe Raytech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0 0 0 CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RAY or CRHKY More Risky?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.016, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.562%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RAY or CRHKY?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Raytech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. pays out 44.02% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RAY or CRHKY?
Raytech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Raytech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.95x while China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raytech Holding Ltd. is 3.00x versus 2.11x for China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.3.00x 7.95x -- -- CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.2.11x 14.15x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RAY or IMG?
CIMG, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of -392.54%. Raytech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 37.42% beat CIMG, Inc.'s return on equity of -645.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.-- -- $4M IMGCIMG, Inc.-39.85% -$0.92 $27.5K -
What do Analysts Say About RAY or IMG?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIMG, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6249.21%. Given that CIMG, Inc. has higher upside potential than Raytech Holding Ltd., analysts believe CIMG, Inc. is more attractive than Raytech Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0 0 0 IMGCIMG, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is RAY or IMG More Risky?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIMG, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.154%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RAY or IMG?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CIMG, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Raytech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIMG, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RAY or IMG?
Raytech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIMG, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9K. Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CIMG, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Raytech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.95x while CIMG, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raytech Holding Ltd. is 3.00x versus 5.04x for CIMG, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.3.00x 7.95x -- -- IMGCIMG, Inc.5.04x -- $366.9K -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns RAY or PTNM?
Pitanium Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. Raytech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 37.42% beat Pitanium Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.-- -- $4M PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RAY or PTNM?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pitanium Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Raytech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Pitanium Ltd., analysts believe Raytech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Pitanium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0 0 0 PTNMPitanium Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RAY or PTNM More Risky?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pitanium Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RAY or PTNM?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pitanium Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Raytech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pitanium Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RAY or PTNM?
Raytech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pitanium Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Pitanium Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Raytech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.95x while Pitanium Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raytech Holding Ltd. is 3.00x versus -- for Pitanium Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.3.00x 7.95x -- -- PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RAY or TWG?
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net margin of --. Raytech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 37.42% beat Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.-- -- $4M TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About RAY or TWG?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Raytech Holding Ltd. has higher upside potential than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe Raytech Holding Ltd. is more attractive than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0 0 0 TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RAY or TWG More Risky?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RAY or TWG?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Raytech Holding Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RAY or TWG?
Raytech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Raytech Holding Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.95x while Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 34.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Raytech Holding Ltd. is 3.00x versus 6.47x for Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.3.00x 7.95x -- -- TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.6.47x 34.34x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 60.69% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 7.84% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.82% over the past day.
