Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
56
PTNM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.39
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$10.39 - $10.39
52-week range:
$0.98 - $14.79
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$238.2M
Revenue:
$9.6M
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.
|
$1.6B | -- | 21.61% | -- | -- |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$1.2M | -$1.17 | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
$10.39 | -- | $238.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.
|
$1.11 | -- | $14.6B | 24.74x | $0.06 | 5.08% | 2.45x |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
$7.00 | -- | $11.4B | 14.15x | $0.13 | 3.31% | 2.11x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
$2.52 | -- | $762M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.04x |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
$1.72 | -- | $81.9M | 7.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.00x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
$6.01 | -- | $3.7M | 34.34x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.47x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.
|
2.89% | -1.840 | -- | 0.83x |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
6.35% | -1.213 | -- | 0.22x |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
803% | -1.323 | 5.79% | 0.27x |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -6.504 | -- | 1.89x |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | 0.872 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PTNM
Pitanium Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BDWBF
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.
|
$745M | $331M | 5.63% | 5.75% | 22.66% | -- |
|
CRHKY
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 12.39% | 13.4% | -- | -- |
|
IMG
CIMG, Inc.
|
-$146.2K | -$1.5M | -594.71% | -645.4% | -403.83% | -$1.3M |
|
RAY
Raytech Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 37.42% | 37.42% | -- | -- |
|
TWG
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Pitanium Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PTNM or BDWBF?
Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Pitanium Ltd.'s net margin of 16.02%. Pitanium Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.'s return on equity of 5.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- BDWBFBudweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.50.99% $0.02 $10.7B -
What do Analysts Say About PTNM or BDWBF?
Pitanium Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pitanium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd., analysts believe Pitanium Ltd. is more attractive than Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTNMPitanium Ltd.0 0 0 BDWBFBudweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PTNM or BDWBF More Risky?
Pitanium Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. has a beta of -0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.169%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTNM or BDWBF?
Pitanium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Pitanium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. pays out 102.43% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTNM or BDWBF?
Pitanium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Pitanium Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.'s net income of $234M. Notably, Pitanium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pitanium Ltd. is -- versus 2.45x for Budweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- -- BDWBFBudweiser Brewing Co. APAC Ltd.2.45x 24.74x $1.5B $234M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTNM or CRHKY?
China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Pitanium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Pitanium Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.-- -- $5.2B -
What do Analysts Say About PTNM or CRHKY?
Pitanium Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pitanium Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd., analysts believe Pitanium Ltd. is more attractive than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTNMPitanium Ltd.0 0 0 CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PTNM or CRHKY More Risky?
Pitanium Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. has a beta of -0.016, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.562%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTNM or CRHKY?
Pitanium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Pitanium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. pays out 44.02% of its earnings as a dividend. China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTNM or CRHKY?
Pitanium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Pitanium Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Pitanium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 14.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pitanium Ltd. is -- versus 2.11x for China Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- -- CRHKYChina Resources Beer (Holdings) Co. Ltd.2.11x 14.15x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PTNM or IMG?
CIMG, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to Pitanium Ltd.'s net margin of -392.54%. Pitanium Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat CIMG, Inc.'s return on equity of -645.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- IMGCIMG, Inc.-39.85% -$0.92 $27.5K -
What do Analysts Say About PTNM or IMG?
Pitanium Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CIMG, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6249.21%. Given that CIMG, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pitanium Ltd., analysts believe CIMG, Inc. is more attractive than Pitanium Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTNMPitanium Ltd.0 0 0 IMGCIMG, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is PTNM or IMG More Risky?
Pitanium Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CIMG, Inc. has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.154%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTNM or IMG?
Pitanium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CIMG, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pitanium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CIMG, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTNM or IMG?
Pitanium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CIMG, Inc. quarterly revenues of $366.9K. Pitanium Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than CIMG, Inc.'s net income of -$1.4M. Notably, Pitanium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CIMG, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pitanium Ltd. is -- versus 5.04x for CIMG, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- -- IMGCIMG, Inc.5.04x -- $366.9K -$1.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns PTNM or RAY?
Raytech Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Pitanium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Pitanium Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Raytech Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of 37.42%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.-- -- $4M -
What do Analysts Say About PTNM or RAY?
Pitanium Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Raytech Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pitanium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Raytech Holding Ltd., analysts believe Pitanium Ltd. is more attractive than Raytech Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTNMPitanium Ltd.0 0 0 RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PTNM or RAY More Risky?
Pitanium Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Raytech Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTNM or RAY?
Pitanium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Raytech Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pitanium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Raytech Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTNM or RAY?
Pitanium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Raytech Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Pitanium Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Raytech Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Pitanium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Raytech Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pitanium Ltd. is -- versus 3.00x for Raytech Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- -- RAYRaytech Holding Ltd.3.00x 7.95x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns PTNM or TWG?
Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Pitanium Ltd.'s net margin of --. Pitanium Ltd.'s return on equity of -- beat Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About PTNM or TWG?
Pitanium Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pitanium Ltd. has higher upside potential than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd., analysts believe Pitanium Ltd. is more attractive than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PTNMPitanium Ltd.0 0 0 TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is PTNM or TWG More Risky?
Pitanium Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PTNM or TWG?
Pitanium Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pitanium Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PTNM or TWG?
Pitanium Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Pitanium Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Pitanium Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is 34.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pitanium Ltd. is -- versus 6.47x for Top Wealth Group Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PTNMPitanium Ltd.-- -- -- -- TWGTop Wealth Group Holding Ltd.6.47x 34.34x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 8
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 59.94% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 8
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 8.12% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 8
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 5.82% over the past day.
