Financhill
Sell
46

BPPPF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$23.91
Seasonality move :
5.92%
Day range:
$23.91 - $23.91
52-week range:
$23.17 - $26.20
Dividend yield:
2.69%
P/E ratio:
17.91x
P/S ratio:
0.62x
P/B ratio:
3.75x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
104
1-year change:
2.06%
Market cap:
$8B
Revenue:
$13B
EPS (TTM):
$1.34

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
BPPPF
Bid Corp. Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
-- -- -- -- --
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
BPPPF
Bid Corp. Ltd.
$23.91 -- $8B 17.91x $0.34 2.69% 0.62x
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
$9.83 -- $378.5M 7.84x $0.12 4.07% 0.30x
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
$25.00 -- $1.7B 12.57x $1.18 7.02% 1.91x
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
$2.57 -- $307.5M 8.27x $0.06 8.87% 0.56x
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
$0.57 -- $513.3M 5.77x $0.02 5.84% 0.35x
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
$18.00 -- $2.7B 13.29x $0.92 3.33% 1.47x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
BPPPF
Bid Corp. Ltd.
26.36% 0.374 -- 0.79x
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
0.81% 0.089 -- 0.83x
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
33.61% -0.444 -- 0.57x
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
34.97% -0.071 -- 0.85x
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
14.63% -0.114 -- 0.76x
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
4.26% 0.397 -- 1.36x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
BPPPF
Bid Corp. Ltd.
-- -- 14.14% 19.08% -- --
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
-- -- 11.19% 12.51% -- --
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
-- -- 33.68% 45.57% -- --
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
-- -- 6.66% 9.74% -- --
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
-- -- 12.79% 15.08% -- --
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
-- -- 18.49% 20.4% -- --

Bid Corp. Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns BPPPF or ALFDF?

    Astral Foods Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Bid Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bid Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.08% beat Astral Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.51%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    -- -- $3.2B
    ALFDF
    Astral Foods Ltd.
    -- -- $259M
  • What do Analysts Say About BPPPF or ALFDF?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Astral Foods Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bid Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Astral Foods Ltd., analysts believe Bid Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than Astral Foods Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    0 0 0
    ALFDF
    Astral Foods Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is BPPPF or ALFDF More Risky?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astral Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.37%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BPPPF or ALFDF?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Astral Foods Ltd. offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Bid Corp. Ltd. pays 47.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Astral Foods Ltd. pays out 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BPPPF or ALFDF?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Astral Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bid Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Astral Foods Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bid Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.91x while Astral Foods Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bid Corp. Ltd. is 0.62x versus 0.30x for Astral Foods Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    0.62x 17.91x -- --
    ALFDF
    Astral Foods Ltd.
    0.30x 7.84x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BPPPF or AVSFY?

    AVI Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Bid Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bid Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.08% beat AVI Ltd.'s return on equity of 45.57%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    -- -- $3.2B
    AVSFY
    AVI Ltd.
    -- -- $403.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About BPPPF or AVSFY?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AVI Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bid Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than AVI Ltd., analysts believe Bid Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than AVI Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    0 0 0
    AVSFY
    AVI Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is BPPPF or AVSFY More Risky?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AVI Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.913%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BPPPF or AVSFY?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. AVI Ltd. offers a yield of 7.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share. Bid Corp. Ltd. pays 47.64% of its earnings as a dividend. AVI Ltd. pays out 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BPPPF or AVSFY?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AVI Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bid Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than AVI Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bid Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.91x while AVI Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bid Corp. Ltd. is 0.62x versus 1.91x for AVI Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    0.62x 17.91x -- --
    AVSFY
    AVI Ltd.
    1.91x 12.57x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BPPPF or OCGPF?

    Oceana Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Bid Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bid Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.08% beat Oceana Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.74%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    -- -- $3.2B
    OCGPF
    Oceana Group Ltd.
    -- -- $678.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About BPPPF or OCGPF?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oceana Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bid Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Oceana Group Ltd., analysts believe Bid Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than Oceana Group Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    0 0 0
    OCGPF
    Oceana Group Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is BPPPF or OCGPF More Risky?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceana Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.044, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.381%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BPPPF or OCGPF?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Oceana Group Ltd. offers a yield of 8.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Bid Corp. Ltd. pays 47.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceana Group Ltd. pays out 50.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BPPPF or OCGPF?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oceana Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bid Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Oceana Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bid Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.91x while Oceana Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bid Corp. Ltd. is 0.62x versus 0.56x for Oceana Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    0.62x 17.91x -- --
    OCGPF
    Oceana Group Ltd.
    0.56x 8.27x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BPPPF or RCLFF?

    RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a net margin of -- compared to Bid Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bid Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.08% beat RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s return on equity of 15.08%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    -- -- $3.2B
    RCLFF
    RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
    -- -- $628.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About BPPPF or RCLFF?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bid Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa), analysts believe Bid Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa).

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    0 0 0
    RCLFF
    RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
    0 0 0
  • Is BPPPF or RCLFF More Risky?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a beta of 0.026, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.437%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BPPPF or RCLFF?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) offers a yield of 5.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Bid Corp. Ltd. pays 47.64% of its earnings as a dividend. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) pays out 33.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BPPPF or RCLFF?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) quarterly revenues of --. Bid Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net income of --. Notably, Bid Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.91x while RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s PE ratio is 5.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bid Corp. Ltd. is 0.62x versus 0.35x for RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    0.62x 17.91x -- --
    RCLFF
    RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
    0.35x 5.77x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns BPPPF or TBLMF?

    Tiger Brands Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Bid Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. Bid Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 19.08% beat Tiger Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 20.4%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    -- -- $3.2B
    TBLMF
    Tiger Brands Ltd.
    -- -- $1.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About BPPPF or TBLMF?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tiger Brands Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Bid Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tiger Brands Ltd., analysts believe Bid Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than Tiger Brands Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    0 0 0
    TBLMF
    Tiger Brands Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is BPPPF or TBLMF More Risky?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.587, which suggesting that the stock is 41.293% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tiger Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.501, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.915%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock BPPPF or TBLMF?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Tiger Brands Ltd. offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Bid Corp. Ltd. pays 47.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Tiger Brands Ltd. pays out 66.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios BPPPF or TBLMF?

    Bid Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tiger Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Bid Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Bid Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.91x while Tiger Brands Ltd.'s PE ratio is 13.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Bid Corp. Ltd. is 0.62x versus 1.47x for Tiger Brands Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    BPPPF
    Bid Corp. Ltd.
    0.62x 17.91x -- --
    TBLMF
    Tiger Brands Ltd.
    1.47x 13.29x -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?

Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…

Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…

Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?

Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…

Stock Ideas

Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x

Buy
59
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
60
AAOI alert for Dec 23

Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 3.16% over the past day.

Buy
52
ABVX alert for Dec 23

Abivax SA [ABVX] is up 1.47% over the past day.

Buy
69
QBTS alert for Dec 23

D-Wave Quantum, Inc. [QBTS] is down 6.65% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock