Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
57
ALFDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$9.83
Seasonality move
:
8.56%
Day range:
$9.83 - $9.83
52-week range:
$7.39 - $9.83
Dividend yield:
4.07%
P/E ratio:
7.79x
P/S ratio:
0.30x
P/B ratio:
1.47x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$378.5M
Revenue:
$1.3B
EPS (TTM):
$1.26
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
$9.83 | -- | $378.5M | 7.79x | $0.12 | 4.07% | 0.30x |
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
$25.00 | -- | $1.7B | 12.57x | $1.18 | 7.02% | 1.91x |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
$6.60 | -- | $330.7M | 10.65x | $0.22 | 5.84% | 0.70x |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
$2.57 | -- | $307.5M | 8.27x | $0.06 | 8.87% | 0.56x |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
$0.57 | -- | $513.3M | 5.77x | $0.02 | 5.84% | 0.35x |
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
$18.00 | -- | $2.7B | 13.29x | $0.92 | 3.33% | 1.47x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
0.81% | 0.089 | -- | 0.83x |
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
33.61% | -0.444 | -- | 0.57x |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
49.24% | -0.163 | -- | 0.90x |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
34.97% | -0.071 | -- | 0.85x |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
14.63% | -0.114 | -- | 0.76x |
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
4.26% | 0.397 | -- | 1.36x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 11.19% | 12.51% | -- | -- |
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 33.68% | 45.57% | -- | -- |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 23.74% | 47.59% | -- | -- |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 6.66% | 9.74% | -- | -- |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
-- | -- | 12.79% | 15.08% | -- | -- |
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 18.49% | 20.4% | -- | -- |
Astral Foods Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ALFDF or AVSFY?
AVI Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Astral Foods Ltd.'s net margin of --. Astral Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.51% beat AVI Ltd.'s return on equity of 45.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.-- -- $259M AVSFYAVI Ltd.-- -- $403.1M -
What do Analysts Say About ALFDF or AVSFY?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AVI Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astral Foods Ltd. has higher upside potential than AVI Ltd., analysts believe Astral Foods Ltd. is more attractive than AVI Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0 0 0 AVSFYAVI Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ALFDF or AVSFY More Risky?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.206, which suggesting that the stock is 79.37% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AVI Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.913%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALFDF or AVSFY?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. AVI Ltd. offers a yield of 7.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share. Astral Foods Ltd. pays 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. AVI Ltd. pays out 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALFDF or AVSFY?
Astral Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AVI Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Astral Foods Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than AVI Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Astral Foods Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while AVI Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astral Foods Ltd. is 0.30x versus 1.91x for AVI Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0.30x 7.79x -- -- AVSFYAVI Ltd.1.91x 12.57x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ALFDF or FMBRY?
Famous Brands Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Astral Foods Ltd.'s net margin of --. Astral Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.51% beat Famous Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 47.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.-- -- $259M FMBRYFamous Brands Ltd.-- -- $131.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ALFDF or FMBRY?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Famous Brands Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astral Foods Ltd. has higher upside potential than Famous Brands Ltd., analysts believe Astral Foods Ltd. is more attractive than Famous Brands Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0 0 0 FMBRYFamous Brands Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ALFDF or FMBRY More Risky?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.206, which suggesting that the stock is 79.37% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Famous Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.006, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.376%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALFDF or FMBRY?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. Famous Brands Ltd. offers a yield of 5.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Astral Foods Ltd. pays 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Famous Brands Ltd. pays out 38.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALFDF or FMBRY?
Astral Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Famous Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Astral Foods Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Famous Brands Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Astral Foods Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while Famous Brands Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astral Foods Ltd. is 0.30x versus 0.70x for Famous Brands Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0.30x 7.79x -- -- FMBRYFamous Brands Ltd.0.70x 10.65x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ALFDF or OCGPF?
Oceana Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Astral Foods Ltd.'s net margin of --. Astral Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.51% beat Oceana Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.-- -- $259M OCGPFOceana Group Ltd.-- -- $678.9M -
What do Analysts Say About ALFDF or OCGPF?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oceana Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astral Foods Ltd. has higher upside potential than Oceana Group Ltd., analysts believe Astral Foods Ltd. is more attractive than Oceana Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0 0 0 OCGPFOceana Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ALFDF or OCGPF More Risky?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.206, which suggesting that the stock is 79.37% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceana Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.044, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.381%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALFDF or OCGPF?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. Oceana Group Ltd. offers a yield of 8.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Astral Foods Ltd. pays 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceana Group Ltd. pays out 50.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALFDF or OCGPF?
Astral Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oceana Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Astral Foods Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Oceana Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Astral Foods Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while Oceana Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astral Foods Ltd. is 0.30x versus 0.56x for Oceana Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0.30x 7.79x -- -- OCGPFOceana Group Ltd.0.56x 8.27x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ALFDF or RCLFF?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a net margin of -- compared to Astral Foods Ltd.'s net margin of --. Astral Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.51% beat RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s return on equity of 15.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.-- -- $259M RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)-- -- $628.7M -
What do Analysts Say About ALFDF or RCLFF?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astral Foods Ltd. has higher upside potential than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa), analysts believe Astral Foods Ltd. is more attractive than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0 0 0 RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0 0 0 -
Is ALFDF or RCLFF More Risky?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.206, which suggesting that the stock is 79.37% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a beta of 0.026, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.437%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALFDF or RCLFF?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) offers a yield of 5.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Astral Foods Ltd. pays 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) pays out 33.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALFDF or RCLFF?
Astral Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) quarterly revenues of --. Astral Foods Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net income of --. Notably, Astral Foods Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s PE ratio is 5.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astral Foods Ltd. is 0.30x versus 0.35x for RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0.30x 7.79x -- -- RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0.35x 5.77x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ALFDF or TBLMF?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Astral Foods Ltd.'s net margin of --. Astral Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.51% beat Tiger Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 20.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.-- -- $259M TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.-- -- $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About ALFDF or TBLMF?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tiger Brands Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Astral Foods Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tiger Brands Ltd., analysts believe Astral Foods Ltd. is more attractive than Tiger Brands Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0 0 0 TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is ALFDF or TBLMF More Risky?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.206, which suggesting that the stock is 79.37% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tiger Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.501, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.915%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALFDF or TBLMF?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.07%. Tiger Brands Ltd. offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Astral Foods Ltd. pays 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Tiger Brands Ltd. pays out 66.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALFDF or TBLMF?
Astral Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tiger Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Astral Foods Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Astral Foods Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 7.79x while Tiger Brands Ltd.'s PE ratio is 13.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Astral Foods Ltd. is 0.30x versus 1.47x for Tiger Brands Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0.30x 7.79x -- -- TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.1.47x 13.29x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
