Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
33
AVSFY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.00
Seasonality move
:
3.46%
Day range:
$25.00 - $25.00
52-week range:
$23.38 - $28.10
Dividend yield:
7.02%
P/E ratio:
12.57x
P/S ratio:
1.91x
P/B ratio:
6.12x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-11.03%
Market cap:
$1.7B
Revenue:
$882.2M
EPS (TTM):
$2.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
$25.00 | -- | $1.7B | 12.57x | $1.18 | 7.02% | 1.91x |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
$9.83 | -- | $378.5M | 7.79x | $0.12 | 4.07% | 0.30x |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
$6.60 | -- | $330.7M | 10.65x | $0.22 | 5.84% | 0.70x |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
$2.57 | -- | $307.5M | 8.27x | $0.06 | 8.87% | 0.56x |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
$0.57 | -- | $513.3M | 5.77x | $0.02 | 5.84% | 0.35x |
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
$18.00 | -- | $2.7B | 13.29x | $0.92 | 3.33% | 1.47x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
33.61% | -0.444 | -- | 0.57x |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
0.81% | 0.089 | -- | 0.83x |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
49.24% | -0.163 | -- | 0.90x |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
34.97% | -0.071 | -- | 0.85x |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
14.63% | -0.114 | -- | 0.76x |
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
4.26% | 0.397 | -- | 1.36x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 33.68% | 45.57% | -- | -- |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 11.19% | 12.51% | -- | -- |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 23.74% | 47.59% | -- | -- |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 6.66% | 9.74% | -- | -- |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
-- | -- | 12.79% | 15.08% | -- | -- |
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 18.49% | 20.4% | -- | -- |
AVI Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns AVSFY or ALFDF?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to AVI Ltd.'s net margin of --. AVI Ltd.'s return on equity of 45.57% beat Astral Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AVSFYAVI Ltd.-- -- $403.1M ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.-- -- $259M -
What do Analysts Say About AVSFY or ALFDF?
AVI Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Astral Foods Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AVI Ltd. has higher upside potential than Astral Foods Ltd., analysts believe AVI Ltd. is more attractive than Astral Foods Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AVSFYAVI Ltd.0 0 0 ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is AVSFY or ALFDF More Risky?
AVI Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, which suggesting that the stock is 87.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astral Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.37%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AVSFY or ALFDF?
AVI Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. Astral Foods Ltd. offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. AVI Ltd. pays 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Astral Foods Ltd. pays out 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AVSFY or ALFDF?
AVI Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Astral Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. AVI Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Astral Foods Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, AVI Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.57x while Astral Foods Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AVI Ltd. is 1.91x versus 0.30x for Astral Foods Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AVSFYAVI Ltd.1.91x 12.57x -- -- ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0.30x 7.79x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AVSFY or FMBRY?
Famous Brands Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to AVI Ltd.'s net margin of --. AVI Ltd.'s return on equity of 45.57% beat Famous Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 47.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AVSFYAVI Ltd.-- -- $403.1M FMBRYFamous Brands Ltd.-- -- $131.6M -
What do Analysts Say About AVSFY or FMBRY?
AVI Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Famous Brands Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AVI Ltd. has higher upside potential than Famous Brands Ltd., analysts believe AVI Ltd. is more attractive than Famous Brands Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AVSFYAVI Ltd.0 0 0 FMBRYFamous Brands Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is AVSFY or FMBRY More Risky?
AVI Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, which suggesting that the stock is 87.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Famous Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.006, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.376%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AVSFY or FMBRY?
AVI Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. Famous Brands Ltd. offers a yield of 5.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. AVI Ltd. pays 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Famous Brands Ltd. pays out 38.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AVSFY or FMBRY?
AVI Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Famous Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. AVI Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Famous Brands Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, AVI Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.57x while Famous Brands Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AVI Ltd. is 1.91x versus 0.70x for Famous Brands Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AVSFYAVI Ltd.1.91x 12.57x -- -- FMBRYFamous Brands Ltd.0.70x 10.65x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AVSFY or OCGPF?
Oceana Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to AVI Ltd.'s net margin of --. AVI Ltd.'s return on equity of 45.57% beat Oceana Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AVSFYAVI Ltd.-- -- $403.1M OCGPFOceana Group Ltd.-- -- $678.9M -
What do Analysts Say About AVSFY or OCGPF?
AVI Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oceana Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AVI Ltd. has higher upside potential than Oceana Group Ltd., analysts believe AVI Ltd. is more attractive than Oceana Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AVSFYAVI Ltd.0 0 0 OCGPFOceana Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is AVSFY or OCGPF More Risky?
AVI Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, which suggesting that the stock is 87.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceana Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.044, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.381%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AVSFY or OCGPF?
AVI Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. Oceana Group Ltd. offers a yield of 8.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. AVI Ltd. pays 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceana Group Ltd. pays out 50.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AVSFY or OCGPF?
AVI Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oceana Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. AVI Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Oceana Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, AVI Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.57x while Oceana Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AVI Ltd. is 1.91x versus 0.56x for Oceana Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AVSFYAVI Ltd.1.91x 12.57x -- -- OCGPFOceana Group Ltd.0.56x 8.27x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AVSFY or RCLFF?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a net margin of -- compared to AVI Ltd.'s net margin of --. AVI Ltd.'s return on equity of 45.57% beat RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s return on equity of 15.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AVSFYAVI Ltd.-- -- $403.1M RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)-- -- $628.7M -
What do Analysts Say About AVSFY or RCLFF?
AVI Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AVI Ltd. has higher upside potential than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa), analysts believe AVI Ltd. is more attractive than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AVSFYAVI Ltd.0 0 0 RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0 0 0 -
Is AVSFY or RCLFF More Risky?
AVI Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, which suggesting that the stock is 87.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a beta of 0.026, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.437%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AVSFY or RCLFF?
AVI Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) offers a yield of 5.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. AVI Ltd. pays 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) pays out 33.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AVSFY or RCLFF?
AVI Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) quarterly revenues of --. AVI Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net income of --. Notably, AVI Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.57x while RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s PE ratio is 5.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AVI Ltd. is 1.91x versus 0.35x for RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AVSFYAVI Ltd.1.91x 12.57x -- -- RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0.35x 5.77x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns AVSFY or TBLMF?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to AVI Ltd.'s net margin of --. AVI Ltd.'s return on equity of 45.57% beat Tiger Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 20.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital AVSFYAVI Ltd.-- -- $403.1M TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.-- -- $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About AVSFY or TBLMF?
AVI Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tiger Brands Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AVI Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tiger Brands Ltd., analysts believe AVI Ltd. is more attractive than Tiger Brands Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings AVSFYAVI Ltd.0 0 0 TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is AVSFY or TBLMF More Risky?
AVI Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, which suggesting that the stock is 87.913% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tiger Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.501, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.915%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock AVSFY or TBLMF?
AVI Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.02%. Tiger Brands Ltd. offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. AVI Ltd. pays 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Tiger Brands Ltd. pays out 66.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios AVSFY or TBLMF?
AVI Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tiger Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. AVI Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, AVI Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 12.57x while Tiger Brands Ltd.'s PE ratio is 13.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AVI Ltd. is 1.91x versus 1.47x for Tiger Brands Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income AVSFYAVI Ltd.1.91x 12.57x -- -- TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.1.47x 13.29x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
