Is SCHD a Good ETF to Buy?
With around $65.7 billion in net assets, Schwab’s US Dividend…
Buy
64
TBLMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.86
Seasonality move
:
-5.69%
Day range:
$15.86 - $15.86
52-week range:
$9.95 - $16.10
Dividend yield:
3.41%
P/E ratio:
15.23x
P/S ratio:
1.23x
P/B ratio:
2.35x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
545
1-year change:
45.83%
Market cap:
$2.5B
Revenue:
$2B
EPS (TTM):
$1.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AVSFY
AVI
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands
|
$15.86 | -- | $2.5B | 15.23x | $0.19 | 3.41% | 1.23x |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods
|
$7.39 | -- | $284.1M | 7.01x | $0.35 | 0% | 0.26x |
|
AVSFY
AVI
|
$28.10 | -- | $1.9B | 15.54x | $1.89 | 5.79% | 2.21x |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands
|
$5.81 | -- | $291.1M | 11.25x | $0.16 | 5.87% | 0.67x |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group
|
$3.50 | -- | $419.9M | 7.07x | $0.16 | 7.73% | 0.77x |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods
|
$0.47 | -- | $422.6M | 4.87x | $0.02 | 4.18% | 0.30x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands
|
4.21% | -0.124 | 2.16% | 0.78x |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods
|
13.66% | 0.000 | 15.53% | 0.77x |
|
AVSFY
AVI
|
17.53% | 0.742 | 4.44% | 0.71x |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands
|
55.79% | -0.338 | -- | 0.85x |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group
|
30.71% | -0.097 | 45.82% | 0.68x |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods
|
11.2% | -0.563 | 21.94% | 0.44x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands
|
-- | -- | 15.23% | 17.09% | -- | -- |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods
|
-- | -- | 13.62% | 17.03% | -- | -- |
|
AVSFY
AVI
|
-- | -- | 32.19% | 41.74% | -- | -- |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands
|
-- | -- | 21.9% | 46.06% | -- | -- |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group
|
-- | -- | 9.86% | 13.73% | -- | -- |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods
|
-- | -- | 10.65% | 12.88% | -- | -- |
Tiger Brands vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TBLMF or ALFDF?
Astral Foods has a net margin of -- compared to Tiger Brands's net margin of --. Tiger Brands's return on equity of 17.09% beat Astral Foods's return on equity of 17.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TBLMFTiger Brands-- -- $1.1B ALFDFAstral Foods-- -- $321.5M -
What do Analysts Say About TBLMF or ALFDF?
Tiger Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Astral Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tiger Brands has higher upside potential than Astral Foods, analysts believe Tiger Brands is more attractive than Astral Foods.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TBLMFTiger Brands0 0 0 ALFDFAstral Foods0 0 0 -
Is TBLMF or ALFDF More Risky?
Tiger Brands has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astral Foods has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TBLMF or ALFDF?
Tiger Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Astral Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Tiger Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Astral Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TBLMF or ALFDF?
Tiger Brands quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Astral Foods quarterly revenues of --. Tiger Brands's net income of -- is lower than Astral Foods's net income of --. Notably, Tiger Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.23x while Astral Foods's PE ratio is 7.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tiger Brands is 1.23x versus 0.26x for Astral Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TBLMFTiger Brands1.23x 15.23x -- -- ALFDFAstral Foods0.26x 7.01x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TBLMF or AVSFY?
AVI has a net margin of -- compared to Tiger Brands's net margin of --. Tiger Brands's return on equity of 17.09% beat AVI's return on equity of 41.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TBLMFTiger Brands-- -- $1.1B AVSFYAVI-- -- $372.4M -
What do Analysts Say About TBLMF or AVSFY?
Tiger Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AVI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tiger Brands has higher upside potential than AVI, analysts believe Tiger Brands is more attractive than AVI.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TBLMFTiger Brands0 0 0 AVSFYAVI0 0 0 -
Is TBLMF or AVSFY More Risky?
Tiger Brands has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AVI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TBLMF or AVSFY?
Tiger Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. AVI offers a yield of 5.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.89 per share. Tiger Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AVI pays out 75.73% of its earnings as a dividend. AVI's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TBLMF or AVSFY?
Tiger Brands quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AVI quarterly revenues of --. Tiger Brands's net income of -- is lower than AVI's net income of --. Notably, Tiger Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.23x while AVI's PE ratio is 15.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tiger Brands is 1.23x versus 2.21x for AVI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TBLMFTiger Brands1.23x 15.23x -- -- AVSFYAVI2.21x 15.54x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TBLMF or FMBRY?
Famous Brands has a net margin of -- compared to Tiger Brands's net margin of --. Tiger Brands's return on equity of 17.09% beat Famous Brands's return on equity of 46.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TBLMFTiger Brands-- -- $1.1B FMBRYFamous Brands-- -- $118.1M -
What do Analysts Say About TBLMF or FMBRY?
Tiger Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Famous Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tiger Brands has higher upside potential than Famous Brands, analysts believe Tiger Brands is more attractive than Famous Brands.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TBLMFTiger Brands0 0 0 FMBRYFamous Brands0 0 0 -
Is TBLMF or FMBRY More Risky?
Tiger Brands has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Famous Brands has a beta of 0.115, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.493%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TBLMF or FMBRY?
Tiger Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Famous Brands offers a yield of 5.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Tiger Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Famous Brands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TBLMF or FMBRY?
Tiger Brands quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Famous Brands quarterly revenues of --. Tiger Brands's net income of -- is lower than Famous Brands's net income of --. Notably, Tiger Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.23x while Famous Brands's PE ratio is 11.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tiger Brands is 1.23x versus 0.67x for Famous Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TBLMFTiger Brands1.23x 15.23x -- -- FMBRYFamous Brands0.67x 11.25x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TBLMF or OCGPF?
Oceana Group has a net margin of -- compared to Tiger Brands's net margin of --. Tiger Brands's return on equity of 17.09% beat Oceana Group's return on equity of 13.73%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TBLMFTiger Brands-- -- $1.1B OCGPFOceana Group-- -- $647M -
What do Analysts Say About TBLMF or OCGPF?
Tiger Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oceana Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tiger Brands has higher upside potential than Oceana Group, analysts believe Tiger Brands is more attractive than Oceana Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TBLMFTiger Brands0 0 0 OCGPFOceana Group0 0 0 -
Is TBLMF or OCGPF More Risky?
Tiger Brands has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceana Group has a beta of -0.045, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.545%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TBLMF or OCGPF?
Tiger Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. Oceana Group offers a yield of 7.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Tiger Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oceana Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TBLMF or OCGPF?
Tiger Brands quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oceana Group quarterly revenues of --. Tiger Brands's net income of -- is lower than Oceana Group's net income of --. Notably, Tiger Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.23x while Oceana Group's PE ratio is 7.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tiger Brands is 1.23x versus 0.77x for Oceana Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TBLMFTiger Brands1.23x 15.23x -- -- OCGPFOceana Group0.77x 7.07x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TBLMF or RCLFF?
RCL Foods has a net margin of -- compared to Tiger Brands's net margin of --. Tiger Brands's return on equity of 17.09% beat RCL Foods's return on equity of 12.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TBLMFTiger Brands-- -- $1.1B RCLFFRCL Foods-- -- $804.5M -
What do Analysts Say About TBLMF or RCLFF?
Tiger Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RCL Foods has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tiger Brands has higher upside potential than RCL Foods, analysts believe Tiger Brands is more attractive than RCL Foods.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TBLMFTiger Brands0 0 0 RCLFFRCL Foods0 0 0 -
Is TBLMF or RCLFF More Risky?
Tiger Brands has a beta of 0.405, which suggesting that the stock is 59.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RCL Foods has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TBLMF or RCLFF?
Tiger Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.41%. RCL Foods offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Tiger Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RCL Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TBLMF or RCLFF?
Tiger Brands quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RCL Foods quarterly revenues of --. Tiger Brands's net income of -- is lower than RCL Foods's net income of --. Notably, Tiger Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.23x while RCL Foods's PE ratio is 4.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tiger Brands is 1.23x versus 0.30x for RCL Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TBLMFTiger Brands1.23x 15.23x -- -- RCLFFRCL Foods0.30x 4.87x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is NAIL a Good ETF to Buy?
If you’re thinking about buying the NAIL ETF, this article…
3 High Dividend Dow Jones Stocks
Thanks to surging stock prices over the past two years,…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
43
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Buy
57
NARI alert for Jan 8
Inari Medical [NARI] is up 22.25% over the past day.
Buy
69
UNF alert for Jan 8
UniFirst [UNF] is up 20.59% over the past day.
Sell
31
APOG alert for Jan 8
Apogee Enterprises [APOG] is down 19.13% over the past day.
