Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Buy
70
TBLMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$18.00
Seasonality move
:
17.51%
Day range:
$18.00 - $18.00
52-week range:
$13.45 - $18.83
Dividend yield:
3.33%
P/E ratio:
13.29x
P/S ratio:
1.47x
P/B ratio:
2.77x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
2
1-year change:
33.83%
Market cap:
$2.7B
Revenue:
$1.9B
EPS (TTM):
$1.35
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
$18.00 | -- | $2.7B | 13.29x | $0.92 | 3.33% | 1.47x |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
$9.83 | -- | $378.5M | 7.79x | $0.12 | 4.07% | 0.30x |
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
$25.00 | -- | $1.7B | 12.57x | $1.18 | 7.02% | 1.91x |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
$6.60 | -- | $330.7M | 10.65x | $0.22 | 5.84% | 0.70x |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
$2.57 | -- | $307.5M | 8.27x | $0.06 | 8.87% | 0.56x |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
$0.57 | -- | $513.3M | 5.77x | $0.02 | 5.84% | 0.35x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
4.26% | 0.397 | -- | 1.36x |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
0.81% | 0.089 | -- | 0.83x |
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
33.61% | -0.444 | -- | 0.57x |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
49.24% | -0.163 | -- | 0.90x |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
34.97% | -0.071 | -- | 0.85x |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
14.63% | -0.114 | -- | 0.76x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 18.49% | 20.4% | -- | -- |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 11.19% | 12.51% | -- | -- |
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 33.68% | 45.57% | -- | -- |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 23.74% | 47.59% | -- | -- |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 6.66% | 9.74% | -- | -- |
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
-- | -- | 12.79% | 15.08% | -- | -- |
Tiger Brands Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TBLMF or ALFDF?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net margin of --. Tiger Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 20.4% beat Astral Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.-- -- $1.1B ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.-- -- $259M -
What do Analysts Say About TBLMF or ALFDF?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Astral Foods Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tiger Brands Ltd. has higher upside potential than Astral Foods Ltd., analysts believe Tiger Brands Ltd. is more attractive than Astral Foods Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.0 0 0 ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TBLMF or ALFDF More Risky?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.501, which suggesting that the stock is 49.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astral Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.37%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TBLMF or ALFDF?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Astral Foods Ltd. offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Tiger Brands Ltd. pays 66.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Astral Foods Ltd. pays out 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TBLMF or ALFDF?
Tiger Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Astral Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Astral Foods Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Tiger Brands Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.29x while Astral Foods Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tiger Brands Ltd. is 1.47x versus 0.30x for Astral Foods Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.1.47x 13.29x -- -- ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0.30x 7.79x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TBLMF or AVSFY?
AVI Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net margin of --. Tiger Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 20.4% beat AVI Ltd.'s return on equity of 45.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.-- -- $1.1B AVSFYAVI Ltd.-- -- $403.1M -
What do Analysts Say About TBLMF or AVSFY?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AVI Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tiger Brands Ltd. has higher upside potential than AVI Ltd., analysts believe Tiger Brands Ltd. is more attractive than AVI Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.0 0 0 AVSFYAVI Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TBLMF or AVSFY More Risky?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.501, which suggesting that the stock is 49.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AVI Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.913%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TBLMF or AVSFY?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. AVI Ltd. offers a yield of 7.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share. Tiger Brands Ltd. pays 66.23% of its earnings as a dividend. AVI Ltd. pays out 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TBLMF or AVSFY?
Tiger Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AVI Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than AVI Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Tiger Brands Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.29x while AVI Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tiger Brands Ltd. is 1.47x versus 1.91x for AVI Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.1.47x 13.29x -- -- AVSFYAVI Ltd.1.91x 12.57x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TBLMF or FMBRY?
Famous Brands Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net margin of --. Tiger Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 20.4% beat Famous Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 47.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.-- -- $1.1B FMBRYFamous Brands Ltd.-- -- $131.6M -
What do Analysts Say About TBLMF or FMBRY?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Famous Brands Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tiger Brands Ltd. has higher upside potential than Famous Brands Ltd., analysts believe Tiger Brands Ltd. is more attractive than Famous Brands Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.0 0 0 FMBRYFamous Brands Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TBLMF or FMBRY More Risky?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.501, which suggesting that the stock is 49.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Famous Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.006, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.376%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TBLMF or FMBRY?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Famous Brands Ltd. offers a yield of 5.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Tiger Brands Ltd. pays 66.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Famous Brands Ltd. pays out 38.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TBLMF or FMBRY?
Tiger Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Famous Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Famous Brands Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Tiger Brands Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.29x while Famous Brands Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tiger Brands Ltd. is 1.47x versus 0.70x for Famous Brands Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.1.47x 13.29x -- -- FMBRYFamous Brands Ltd.0.70x 10.65x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TBLMF or OCGPF?
Oceana Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net margin of --. Tiger Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 20.4% beat Oceana Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.-- -- $1.1B OCGPFOceana Group Ltd.-- -- $678.9M -
What do Analysts Say About TBLMF or OCGPF?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oceana Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tiger Brands Ltd. has higher upside potential than Oceana Group Ltd., analysts believe Tiger Brands Ltd. is more attractive than Oceana Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.0 0 0 OCGPFOceana Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is TBLMF or OCGPF More Risky?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.501, which suggesting that the stock is 49.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceana Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.044, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.381%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TBLMF or OCGPF?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. Oceana Group Ltd. offers a yield of 8.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Tiger Brands Ltd. pays 66.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceana Group Ltd. pays out 50.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TBLMF or OCGPF?
Tiger Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oceana Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Oceana Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Tiger Brands Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.29x while Oceana Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tiger Brands Ltd. is 1.47x versus 0.56x for Oceana Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.1.47x 13.29x -- -- OCGPFOceana Group Ltd.0.56x 8.27x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TBLMF or RCLFF?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a net margin of -- compared to Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net margin of --. Tiger Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 20.4% beat RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s return on equity of 15.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.-- -- $1.1B RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)-- -- $628.7M -
What do Analysts Say About TBLMF or RCLFF?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tiger Brands Ltd. has higher upside potential than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa), analysts believe Tiger Brands Ltd. is more attractive than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa).
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.0 0 0 RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0 0 0 -
Is TBLMF or RCLFF More Risky?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.501, which suggesting that the stock is 49.915% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a beta of 0.026, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.437%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TBLMF or RCLFF?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.33%. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) offers a yield of 5.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Tiger Brands Ltd. pays 66.23% of its earnings as a dividend. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) pays out 33.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TBLMF or RCLFF?
Tiger Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) quarterly revenues of --. Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net income of --. Notably, Tiger Brands Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.29x while RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s PE ratio is 5.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tiger Brands Ltd. is 1.47x versus 0.35x for RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.1.47x 13.29x -- -- RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0.35x 5.77x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
