Why Did SoFi Stock Drop?
Fintech platform SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) has stumbled in recent days, selling…
Sell
35
RCLFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.57
Seasonality move
:
0%
Day range:
$0.57 - $0.57
52-week range:
$0.55 - $0.66
Dividend yield:
5.84%
P/E ratio:
5.77x
P/S ratio:
0.35x
P/B ratio:
0.94x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
-13.33%
Market cap:
$513.3M
Revenue:
$1.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
$0.57 | -- | $513.3M | 5.77x | $0.02 | 5.84% | 0.35x |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
$9.83 | -- | $378.5M | 7.79x | $0.12 | 4.07% | 0.30x |
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
$25.00 | -- | $1.7B | 12.57x | $1.18 | 7.02% | 1.91x |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
$6.60 | -- | $330.7M | 10.65x | $0.22 | 5.84% | 0.70x |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
$2.57 | -- | $307.5M | 8.27x | $0.06 | 8.87% | 0.56x |
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
$18.00 | -- | $2.7B | 13.29x | $0.92 | 3.33% | 1.47x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
14.63% | -0.114 | -- | 0.76x |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
0.81% | 0.089 | -- | 0.83x |
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
33.61% | -0.444 | -- | 0.57x |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
49.24% | -0.163 | -- | 0.90x |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
34.97% | -0.071 | -- | 0.85x |
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
4.26% | 0.397 | -- | 1.36x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
RCLFF
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)
|
-- | -- | 12.79% | 15.08% | -- | -- |
|
ALFDF
Astral Foods Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 11.19% | 12.51% | -- | -- |
|
AVSFY
AVI Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 33.68% | 45.57% | -- | -- |
|
FMBRY
Famous Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 23.74% | 47.59% | -- | -- |
|
OCGPF
Oceana Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 6.66% | 9.74% | -- | -- |
|
TBLMF
Tiger Brands Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 18.49% | 20.4% | -- | -- |
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns RCLFF or ALFDF?
Astral Foods Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net margin of --. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s return on equity of 15.08% beat Astral Foods Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.51%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)-- -- $628.7M ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.-- -- $259M -
What do Analysts Say About RCLFF or ALFDF?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Astral Foods Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has higher upside potential than Astral Foods Ltd., analysts believe RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) is more attractive than Astral Foods Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0 0 0 ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RCLFF or ALFDF More Risky?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a beta of 0.026, which suggesting that the stock is 97.437% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Astral Foods Ltd. has a beta of 0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.37%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RCLFF or ALFDF?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.84%. Astral Foods Ltd. offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) pays 33.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Astral Foods Ltd. pays out 48.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RCLFF or ALFDF?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Astral Foods Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net income of -- is lower than Astral Foods Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.77x while Astral Foods Ltd.'s PE ratio is 7.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) is 0.35x versus 0.30x for Astral Foods Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0.35x 5.77x -- -- ALFDFAstral Foods Ltd.0.30x 7.79x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RCLFF or AVSFY?
AVI Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net margin of --. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s return on equity of 15.08% beat AVI Ltd.'s return on equity of 45.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)-- -- $628.7M AVSFYAVI Ltd.-- -- $403.1M -
What do Analysts Say About RCLFF or AVSFY?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AVI Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has higher upside potential than AVI Ltd., analysts believe RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) is more attractive than AVI Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0 0 0 AVSFYAVI Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RCLFF or AVSFY More Risky?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a beta of 0.026, which suggesting that the stock is 97.437% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AVI Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.913%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RCLFF or AVSFY?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.84%. AVI Ltd. offers a yield of 7.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.18 per share. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) pays 33.34% of its earnings as a dividend. AVI Ltd. pays out 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RCLFF or AVSFY?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AVI Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net income of -- is lower than AVI Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.77x while AVI Ltd.'s PE ratio is 12.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) is 0.35x versus 1.91x for AVI Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0.35x 5.77x -- -- AVSFYAVI Ltd.1.91x 12.57x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RCLFF or FMBRY?
Famous Brands Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net margin of --. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s return on equity of 15.08% beat Famous Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 47.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)-- -- $628.7M FMBRYFamous Brands Ltd.-- -- $131.6M -
What do Analysts Say About RCLFF or FMBRY?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Famous Brands Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has higher upside potential than Famous Brands Ltd., analysts believe RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) is more attractive than Famous Brands Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0 0 0 FMBRYFamous Brands Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RCLFF or FMBRY More Risky?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a beta of 0.026, which suggesting that the stock is 97.437% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Famous Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.006, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.376%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RCLFF or FMBRY?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.84%. Famous Brands Ltd. offers a yield of 5.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) pays 33.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Famous Brands Ltd. pays out 38.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RCLFF or FMBRY?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Famous Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net income of -- is lower than Famous Brands Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.77x while Famous Brands Ltd.'s PE ratio is 10.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) is 0.35x versus 0.70x for Famous Brands Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0.35x 5.77x -- -- FMBRYFamous Brands Ltd.0.70x 10.65x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RCLFF or OCGPF?
Oceana Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net margin of --. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s return on equity of 15.08% beat Oceana Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 9.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)-- -- $628.7M OCGPFOceana Group Ltd.-- -- $678.9M -
What do Analysts Say About RCLFF or OCGPF?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oceana Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has higher upside potential than Oceana Group Ltd., analysts believe RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) is more attractive than Oceana Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0 0 0 OCGPFOceana Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RCLFF or OCGPF More Risky?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a beta of 0.026, which suggesting that the stock is 97.437% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceana Group Ltd. has a beta of -0.044, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.381%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RCLFF or OCGPF?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.84%. Oceana Group Ltd. offers a yield of 8.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) pays 33.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceana Group Ltd. pays out 50.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RCLFF or OCGPF?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oceana Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net income of -- is lower than Oceana Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.77x while Oceana Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) is 0.35x versus 0.56x for Oceana Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0.35x 5.77x -- -- OCGPFOceana Group Ltd.0.56x 8.27x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns RCLFF or TBLMF?
Tiger Brands Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net margin of --. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s return on equity of 15.08% beat Tiger Brands Ltd.'s return on equity of 20.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)-- -- $628.7M TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.-- -- $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About RCLFF or TBLMF?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tiger Brands Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has higher upside potential than Tiger Brands Ltd., analysts believe RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) is more attractive than Tiger Brands Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0 0 0 TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is RCLFF or TBLMF More Risky?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a beta of 0.026, which suggesting that the stock is 97.437% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tiger Brands Ltd. has a beta of 0.501, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.915%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock RCLFF or TBLMF?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.84%. Tiger Brands Ltd. offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) pays 33.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Tiger Brands Ltd. pays out 66.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios RCLFF or TBLMF?
RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tiger Brands Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s net income of -- is lower than Tiger Brands Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.77x while Tiger Brands Ltd.'s PE ratio is 13.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa) is 0.35x versus 1.47x for Tiger Brands Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income RCLFFRCL Foods Ltd. (South Africa)0.35x 5.77x -- -- TBLMFTiger Brands Ltd.1.47x 13.29x -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Robinhood Win AI Investing?
Recently, online brokerage Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) has been focused on introducing…
Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
81
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
56
SMX alert for Dec 6
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 134.09% over the past day.
Buy
62
PRAX alert for Dec 6
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. [PRAX] is up 30.47% over the past day.
Sell
13
PSN alert for Dec 6
Parsons Corp. [PSN] is down 21.1% over the past day.
