NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…
Buy
51
SMOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$99.70
Seasonality move
:
-1.54%
Day range:
$99.58 - $102.24
52-week range:
$91.01 - $114.01
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
2.3K
Avg. volume:
3K
1-year change:
-4.28%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCEN
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
$101.42 | -- | -- | -- | $1.75 | 0% | -- |
|
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
|
$26.23 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 1.09% | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
$14.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.03 | 1.51% | -- |
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
$22.32 | -- | -- | -- | $0.12 | 1.35% | -- |
|
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF
|
$41.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
OCEN
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
|
$20.38 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 1.96% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.363 | -- | -- |
|
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | 2.264 | -- | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | 1.181 | -- | -- |
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
OCEN
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
|
-- | 1.273 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ACES
ALPS Clean Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FAN
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBAT
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OCEN
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or ACES?
ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat ALPS Clean Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or ACES?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ALPS Clean Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than ALPS Clean Energy ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than ALPS Clean Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or ACES More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.331, which suggesting that the stock is 33.133% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ALPS Clean Energy ETF has a beta of 1.475, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.486%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or ACES?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ALPS Clean Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ALPS Clean Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or ACES?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ALPS Clean Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than ALPS Clean Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ALPS Clean Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for ALPS Clean Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- ACESALPS Clean Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or FAN?
First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- FANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or FAN?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 FANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or FAN More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.331, which suggesting that the stock is 33.133% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.905%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or FAN?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or FAN?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- FANFirst Trust Global Wind Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or IBAT?
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or IBAT?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or IBAT More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.331, which suggesting that the stock is 33.133% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or IBAT?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or IBAT?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- IBATiShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or NUKZ?
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- NUKZRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or NUKZ?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 NUKZRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or NUKZ More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.331, which suggesting that the stock is 33.133% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or NUKZ?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or NUKZ?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- NUKZRange Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or OCEN?
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat NYLI Clean Oceans ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- OCENNYLI Clean Oceans ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or OCEN?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NYLI Clean Oceans ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than NYLI Clean Oceans ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than NYLI Clean Oceans ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 OCENNYLI Clean Oceans ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or OCEN More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.331, which suggesting that the stock is 33.133% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NYLI Clean Oceans ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or OCEN?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NYLI Clean Oceans ETF offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NYLI Clean Oceans ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or OCEN?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NYLI Clean Oceans ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than NYLI Clean Oceans ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NYLI Clean Oceans ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for NYLI Clean Oceans ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- OCENNYLI Clean Oceans ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 6.33% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 14.95% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4.81% over the past day.
