Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
60
SMOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$133.25
Seasonality move
:
-0.87%
Day range:
$133.01 - $133.55
52-week range:
$88.51 - $138.84
Dividend yield:
1.21%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
720
Avg. volume:
2K
1-year change:
31.46%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
$133.55 | -- | -- | -- | $1.62 | 1.21% | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
$29.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 1.54% | -- |
|
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
|
$46.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.22 | 1.12% | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
$37.45 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 0.95% | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
$48.04 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0.34% | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
$74.97 | -- | -- | -- | $0.21 | 0.59% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | 0.650 | -- | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
-- | 1.436 | -- | -- |
|
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
|
-- | 0.943 | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | 3.774 | -- | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | 2.146 | -- | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | 1.285 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or DRIV?
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- DRIVGlobal X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or DRIV?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 DRIVGlobal X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or DRIV More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF has a beta of 1.420, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.989%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or DRIV?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or DRIV?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- DRIVGlobal X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or ERTH?
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- ERTHInvesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or ERTH?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 ERTHInvesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or ERTH More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.134%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or ERTH?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or ERTH?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- ERTHInvesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or HYDR?
Global X Hydrogen ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Hydrogen ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or HYDR?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Hydrogen ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Hydrogen ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than Global X Hydrogen ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or HYDR More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Hydrogen ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or HYDR?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Global X Hydrogen ETF offers a yield of 0.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Hydrogen ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or HYDR?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Hydrogen ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Hydrogen ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Hydrogen ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Hydrogen ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or TAN?
Invesco Solar ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Solar ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or TAN?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Solar ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Solar ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than Invesco Solar ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 TANInvesco Solar ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or TAN More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Solar ETF has a beta of 1.473, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.287%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or TAN?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Invesco Solar ETF offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Solar ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or TAN?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Solar ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Solar ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Solar ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Solar ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMOG or XT?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a net margin of -- compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net margin of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SMOG or XT?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF, analysts believe VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is more attractive than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF0 0 0 -
Is SMOG or XT More Risky?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.141, which suggesting that the stock is 14.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.647%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMOG or XT?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMOG or XT?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF quarterly revenues of --. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net income of --. Notably, VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -- XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Buy
54
SMX alert for Dec 5
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.
Buy
67
NUTX alert for Dec 5
Nutex Health, Inc. [NUTX] is up 18.9% over the past day.
