Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
60
TAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$50.78
Seasonality move
:
-0.84%
Day range:
$50.19 - $51.08
52-week range:
$25.53 - $53.68
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
460.8K
Avg. volume:
854.5K
1-year change:
47.8%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
$50.83 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0% | -- |
|
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
|
$36.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.22% | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
$33.82 | -- | -- | -- | $0.26 | 1.05% | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
$126.72 | -- | -- | -- | $3.17 | 2.5% | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
$132.19 | -- | -- | -- | $2.03 | 1.54% | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
$70.80 | -- | -- | -- | $5.33 | 0.99% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | 2.146 | -- | -- |
|
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
|
-- | 1.842 | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | 3.774 | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | 3.656 | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | 0.650 | -- | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | 1.285 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Invesco Solar ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TAN or BOTZ?
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Solar ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Solar ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- BOTZGlobal X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TAN or BOTZ?
Invesco Solar ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Solar ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF, analysts believe Invesco Solar ETF is more attractive than Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TANInvesco Solar ETF0 0 0 BOTZGlobal X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF0 0 0 -
Is TAN or BOTZ More Risky?
Invesco Solar ETF has a beta of 1.473, which suggesting that the stock is 47.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF has a beta of 1.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.152%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TAN or BOTZ?
Invesco Solar ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF offers a yield of 0.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Invesco Solar ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TAN or BOTZ?
Invesco Solar ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Solar ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Solar ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Solar ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- -- BOTZGlobal X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TAN or HYDR?
Global X Hydrogen ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Solar ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Solar ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Hydrogen ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TAN or HYDR?
Invesco Solar ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Hydrogen ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Solar ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Hydrogen ETF, analysts believe Invesco Solar ETF is more attractive than Global X Hydrogen ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TANInvesco Solar ETF0 0 0 HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF0 0 0 -
Is TAN or HYDR More Risky?
Invesco Solar ETF has a beta of 1.473, which suggesting that the stock is 47.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Hydrogen ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TAN or HYDR?
Invesco Solar ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global X Hydrogen ETF offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Invesco Solar ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Hydrogen ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TAN or HYDR?
Invesco Solar ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Hydrogen ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Solar ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Hydrogen ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Solar ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Hydrogen ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Solar ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Hydrogen ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- -- HYDRGlobal X Hydrogen ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TAN or NLR?
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Solar ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Solar ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TAN or NLR?
Invesco Solar ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Solar ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF, analysts believe Invesco Solar ETF is more attractive than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TANInvesco Solar ETF0 0 0 NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF0 0 0 -
Is TAN or NLR More Risky?
Invesco Solar ETF has a beta of 1.473, which suggesting that the stock is 47.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.77%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TAN or NLR?
Invesco Solar ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.17 per share. Invesco Solar ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TAN or NLR?
Invesco Solar ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Solar ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Solar ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Solar ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- -- NLRVanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TAN or SMOG?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Solar ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Solar ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TAN or SMOG?
Invesco Solar ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Solar ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF, analysts believe Invesco Solar ETF is more attractive than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TANInvesco Solar ETF0 0 0 SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is TAN or SMOG More Risky?
Invesco Solar ETF has a beta of 1.473, which suggesting that the stock is 47.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.148%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TAN or SMOG?
Invesco Solar ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.03 per share. Invesco Solar ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TAN or SMOG?
Invesco Solar ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Solar ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Solar ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Solar ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TAN or XT?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Invesco Solar ETF's net margin of --. Invesco Solar ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TAN or XT?
Invesco Solar ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Invesco Solar ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF, analysts believe Invesco Solar ETF is more attractive than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TANInvesco Solar ETF0 0 0 XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF0 0 0 -
Is TAN or XT More Risky?
Invesco Solar ETF has a beta of 1.473, which suggesting that the stock is 47.287% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.647%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TAN or XT?
Invesco Solar ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.33 per share. Invesco Solar ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TAN or XT?
Invesco Solar ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF quarterly revenues of --. Invesco Solar ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net income of --. Notably, Invesco Solar ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Invesco Solar ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- -- XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
