Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Buy
60
XT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$70.80
Seasonality move
:
0.61%
Day range:
$70.67 - $70.88
52-week range:
$49.01 - $76.29
Dividend yield:
0.99%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
96.4K
Avg. volume:
112.8K
1-year change:
15.76%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
$70.80 | -- | -- | -- | $5.33 | 0.99% | -- |
|
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
|
$36.59 | -- | -- | -- | $0.08 | 0.22% | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
$30.46 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 1.52% | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
$67.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.14 | 0.39% | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
$132.19 | -- | -- | -- | $2.03 | 1.54% | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
$50.83 | -- | -- | -- | $0.16 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | 1.285 | -- | -- |
|
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
|
-- | 1.842 | -- | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
-- | 1.436 | -- | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | 1.422 | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | 0.650 | -- | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | 2.146 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LIT
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns XT or BOTZ?
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- BOTZGlobal X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XT or BOTZ?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF is more attractive than Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF0 0 0 BOTZGlobal X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF0 0 0 -
Is XT or BOTZ More Risky?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a beta of 1.166, which suggesting that the stock is 16.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF has a beta of 1.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.152%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XT or BOTZ?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $5.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF offers a yield of 0.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XT or BOTZ?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- -- BOTZGlobal X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XT or DRIV?
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- DRIVGlobal X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XT or DRIV?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF is more attractive than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF0 0 0 DRIVGlobal X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF0 0 0 -
Is XT or DRIV More Risky?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a beta of 1.166, which suggesting that the stock is 16.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF has a beta of 1.420, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.989%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XT or DRIV?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $5.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XT or DRIV?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- -- DRIVGlobal X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XT or LIT?
Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XT or LIT?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has higher upside potential than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF is more attractive than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF0 0 0 LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF0 0 0 -
Is XT or LIT More Risky?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a beta of 1.166, which suggesting that the stock is 16.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.582%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XT or LIT?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $5.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XT or LIT?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF is -- versus -- for Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- -- LITGlobal X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XT or SMOG?
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XT or SMOG?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF is more attractive than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF0 0 0 SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF0 0 0 -
Is XT or SMOG More Risky?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a beta of 1.166, which suggesting that the stock is 16.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.148%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XT or SMOG?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $5.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.03 per share. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XT or SMOG?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- -- SMOGVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns XT or TAN?
Invesco Solar ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net margin of --. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Solar ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About XT or TAN?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Solar ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Solar ETF, analysts believe iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF is more attractive than Invesco Solar ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF0 0 0 TANInvesco Solar ETF0 0 0 -
Is XT or TAN More Risky?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a beta of 1.166, which suggesting that the stock is 16.647% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Solar ETF has a beta of 1.473, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.287%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock XT or TAN?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a quarterly dividend of $5.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Invesco Solar ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Solar ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios XT or TAN?
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Solar ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Solar ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Solar ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Solar ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF-- -- -- -- TANInvesco Solar ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 27
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is up 16.92% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 27
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 15.76% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 27
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is down 10% over the past day.
