HYDR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Hydrogen ETF's net margin of --. Global X Hydrogen ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility's return on equity of --.

Global X Hydrogen ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Hydrogen ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility, analysts believe Global X Hydrogen ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility.

Global X Hydrogen ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.114%.

Global X Hydrogen ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility offers a yield of 0.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Global X Hydrogen ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global X Hydrogen ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility quarterly revenues of --. Global X Hydrogen ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility's net income of --. Notably, Global X Hydrogen ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Hydrogen ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Hydrogen ETF's net margin of --. Global X Hydrogen ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's return on equity of --.

Global X Hydrogen ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Hydrogen ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF, analysts believe Global X Hydrogen ETF is more attractive than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF.

Global X Hydrogen ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF has a beta of 1.141, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.148%.

Global X Hydrogen ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.03 per share. Global X Hydrogen ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global X Hydrogen ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Hydrogen ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Hydrogen ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Hydrogen ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Invesco Solar ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Hydrogen ETF's net margin of --. Global X Hydrogen ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Solar ETF's return on equity of --.

Global X Hydrogen ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Solar ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Hydrogen ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Solar ETF, analysts believe Global X Hydrogen ETF is more attractive than Invesco Solar ETF.

Global X Hydrogen ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Solar ETF has a beta of 1.473, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.287%.

Global X Hydrogen ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Invesco Solar ETF offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Global X Hydrogen ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Solar ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global X Hydrogen ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Solar ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Hydrogen ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Solar ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Hydrogen ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Solar ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Hydrogen ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Solar ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Global X Hydrogen ETF's net margin of --. Global X Hydrogen ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's return on equity of --.

Global X Hydrogen ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Global X Hydrogen ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF, analysts believe Global X Hydrogen ETF is more attractive than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF.

Global X Hydrogen ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF has a beta of 1.166, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.647%.

Global X Hydrogen ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.33 per share. Global X Hydrogen ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Global X Hydrogen ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF quarterly revenues of --. Global X Hydrogen ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's net income of --. Notably, Global X Hydrogen ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Global X Hydrogen ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.