TGLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ferroglobe PLC has a net margin of 18.12% compared to Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net margin of -4.26%. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.31% beat Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of -16.82%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a consensus price target of $74.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.66%. On the other hand Ferroglobe PLC has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 26.05%. Given that Tecnoglass, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ferroglobe PLC, analysts believe Tecnoglass, Inc. is more attractive than Ferroglobe PLC.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a beta of 1.733, which suggesting that the stock is 73.307% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.404%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Ferroglobe PLC offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Tecnoglass, Inc. pays 13.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferroglobe PLC pays out 41.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tecnoglass, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.5M, which are smaller than Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues of $311.7M. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net income of $47.2M is higher than Ferroglobe PLC's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Tecnoglass, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.49x while Ferroglobe PLC's PE ratio is 187.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecnoglass, Inc. is 2.49x versus 0.65x for Ferroglobe PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 18.12% compared to Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net margin of 4.68%. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.31% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 12.44%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a consensus price target of $74.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.66%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could fall by -8.87%. Given that Tecnoglass, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum Corp., analysts believe Tecnoglass, Inc. is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a beta of 1.733, which suggesting that the stock is 73.307% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.511, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.066%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Tecnoglass, Inc. pays 13.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 107.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s is not.

Tecnoglass, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.5M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.5M. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net income of $47.2M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, Tecnoglass, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.49x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecnoglass, Inc. is 2.49x versus 0.60x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 18.12% compared to Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net margin of --. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.31% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a consensus price target of $74.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.66%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 44.07%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Tecnoglass, Inc., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Tecnoglass, Inc..

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a beta of 1.733, which suggesting that the stock is 73.307% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecnoglass, Inc. pays 13.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tecnoglass, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.5M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net income of $47.2M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Tecnoglass, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.49x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecnoglass, Inc. is 2.49x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of 18.12% compared to Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net margin of --. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.31% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a consensus price target of $74.00, signalling upside risk potential of 42.66%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 134.56%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Tecnoglass, Inc., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Tecnoglass, Inc..

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a beta of 1.733, which suggesting that the stock is 73.307% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecnoglass, Inc. pays 13.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tecnoglass, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.5M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net income of $47.2M is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Tecnoglass, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.49x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecnoglass, Inc. is 2.49x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.