TGLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of 18.12% compared to Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net margin of 1.68%. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.31% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a consensus price target of $71.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.01%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $59.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.15%. Given that Tecnoglass, Inc. has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum Co., analysts believe Tecnoglass, Inc. is more attractive than Century Aluminum Co..

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a beta of 1.707, which suggesting that the stock is 70.721% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.674%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecnoglass, Inc. pays 13.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tecnoglass, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.5M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net income of $47.2M is higher than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Tecnoglass, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.78x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 57.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecnoglass, Inc. is 2.54x versus 1.78x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cementos Argos SA has a net margin of 18.12% compared to Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net margin of 19.12%. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.31% beat Cementos Argos SA's return on equity of 2.54%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a consensus price target of $71.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.01%. On the other hand Cementos Argos SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Tecnoglass, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cementos Argos SA, analysts believe Tecnoglass, Inc. is more attractive than Cementos Argos SA.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a beta of 1.707, which suggesting that the stock is 70.721% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cementos Argos SA has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.734%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Cementos Argos SA offers a yield of 4.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Tecnoglass, Inc. pays 13.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Cementos Argos SA pays out -1641.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tecnoglass, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.5M, which are smaller than Cementos Argos SA quarterly revenues of $341.1M. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net income of $47.2M is lower than Cementos Argos SA's net income of $65.2M. Notably, Tecnoglass, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.78x while Cementos Argos SA's PE ratio is 74.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecnoglass, Inc. is 2.54x versus 3.95x for Cementos Argos SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Constellium SE has a net margin of 18.12% compared to Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net margin of 4.06%. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.31% beat Constellium SE's return on equity of 13.75%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a consensus price target of $71.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.01%. On the other hand Constellium SE has an analysts' consensus of $24.24 which suggests that it could grow by 4.09%. Given that Tecnoglass, Inc. has higher upside potential than Constellium SE, analysts believe Tecnoglass, Inc. is more attractive than Constellium SE.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a beta of 1.707, which suggesting that the stock is 70.721% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellium SE has a beta of 1.508, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.75%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Constellium SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tecnoglass, Inc. pays 13.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellium SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tecnoglass, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.5M, which are smaller than Constellium SE quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net income of $47.2M is lower than Constellium SE's net income of $88M. Notably, Tecnoglass, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.78x while Constellium SE's PE ratio is 28.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecnoglass, Inc. is 2.54x versus 0.42x for Constellium SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 18.12% compared to Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net margin of 4.68%. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s return on equity of 26.31% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 12.44%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a consensus price target of $71.50, signalling upside risk potential of 35.01%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $119.00 which suggests that it could fall by -15.25%. Given that Tecnoglass, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum Corp., analysts believe Tecnoglass, Inc. is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a beta of 1.707, which suggesting that the stock is 70.721% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.06%.

Tecnoglass, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.13%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Tecnoglass, Inc. pays 13.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 107.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s is not.

Tecnoglass, Inc. quarterly revenues are $260.5M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.5M. Tecnoglass, Inc.'s net income of $47.2M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, Tecnoglass, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 13.78x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 25.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tecnoglass, Inc. is 2.54x versus 0.72x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.