Is DocuSign Stock Undervalued?
Digital signature software business DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) has been struggling over…
Sell
34
SSD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$166.13
Seasonality move
:
0.19%
Day range:
$165.50 - $167.80
52-week range:
$137.35 - $197.82
Dividend yield:
0.68%
P/E ratio:
20.34x
P/S ratio:
3.03x
P/B ratio:
3.45x
Volume:
112.2K
Avg. volume:
291.4K
1-year change:
-0.88%
Market cap:
$6.9B
Revenue:
$2.2B
EPS (TTM):
$8.22
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
|
$604.9M | $2.34 | 2.57% | -4.18% | $199.00 |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
$629.9M | $0.84 | 5.06% | 209.61% | $40.00 |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
|
$850M | $0.89 | 17.78% | 221.06% | $106.50 |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
-- | -$0.02 | -- | -50% | $1.70 |
|
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.
|
$1.6B | $1.39 | -3.99% | 1.72% | $109.40 |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -64.16% | $1.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
|
$167.18 | $199.00 | $6.9B | 20.34x | $0.29 | 0.68% | 3.03x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
$40.18 | $40.00 | $3.8B | 50.31x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.55x |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
|
$117.55 | $106.50 | $1.9B | 21.23x | $0.77 | 2.62% | 0.60x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
$1.24 | $1.70 | $97.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.
|
$92.83 | $109.40 | $5.4B | 17.33x | $0.35 | 1.51% | 0.84x |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
$0.69 | $1.50 | $62.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
|
18.84% | 0.760 | 6.71% | 1.73x |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
45.47% | 1.899 | 22.94% | 0.71x |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
|
57.11% | 1.986 | 85.84% | 0.92x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
27.01% | 2.031 | 12.18% | 1.08x |
|
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.
|
10.4% | 0.641 | 6.75% | 3.12x |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
0.07% | 0.780 | 0.03% | 17.12x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.
|
$289.3M | $127M | 14.44% | 18.2% | 20.36% | $133.9M |
|
CENX
Century Aluminum Co.
|
$77.3M | $58.3M | 5.64% | 10.05% | 9.22% | -$18.1M |
|
KALU
Kaiser Aluminum Corp.
|
$82.7M | $48.8M | 5.03% | 12.44% | 5.79% | $34.5M |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.
|
-$95.7K | -$1.5M | -25.69% | -34.36% | -- | -$1.1M |
|
UFPI
UFP Industries, Inc.
|
$262.7M | $92.7M | 8.73% | 9.74% | 5.94% | $210.2M |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources Corp.
|
-$18K | -$2M | -20.56% | -20.59% | -- | -$1.7M |
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SSD or CENX?
Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of 17.23% compared to Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net margin of 1.68%. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 18.2% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.46.39% $2.58 $2.5B CENXCentury Aluminum Co.12.23% $0.14 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About SSD or CENX?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $199.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.49%. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.45%. Given that Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum Co., analysts believe Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is more attractive than Century Aluminum Co..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.1 1 0 CENXCentury Aluminum Co.3 0 0 -
Is SSD or CENX More Risky?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.528%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSD or CENX?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. pays 14.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSD or CENX?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $623.5M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net income of $107.4M is higher than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 50.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is 3.03x versus 1.55x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.3.03x 20.34x $623.5M $107.4M CENXCentury Aluminum Co.1.55x 50.31x $632.2M $10.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns SSD or KALU?
Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 17.23% compared to Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net margin of 4.68%. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 18.2% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 12.44%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.46.39% $2.58 $2.5B KALUKaiser Aluminum Corp.9.8% $2.38 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About SSD or KALU?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $199.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.49%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could fall by -9.4%. Given that Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum Corp., analysts believe Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.1 1 0 KALUKaiser Aluminum Corp.1 1 0 -
Is SSD or KALU More Risky?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.511, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.066%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSD or KALU?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. pays 14.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 107.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSD or KALU?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $623.5M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.5M. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net income of $107.4M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is 3.03x versus 0.60x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.3.03x 20.34x $623.5M $107.4M KALUKaiser Aluminum Corp.0.60x 21.23x $843.5M $39.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns SSD or PZG?
Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 17.23% compared to Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net margin of --. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 18.2% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.46.39% $2.58 $2.5B PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.-- -$0.06 $43.2M -
What do Analysts Say About SSD or PZG?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $199.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.49%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 37.1%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.1 1 0 PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.1 0 0 -
Is SSD or PZG More Risky?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.91%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSD or PZG?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. pays 14.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSD or PZG?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $623.5M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net income of $107.4M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is 3.03x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.3.03x 20.34x $623.5M $107.4M PZGParamount Gold Nevada Corp.-- -- -- -$4.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns SSD or UFPI?
UFP Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 17.23% compared to Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net margin of 4.66%. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 18.2% beat UFP Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.46.39% $2.58 $2.5B UFPIUFP Industries, Inc.16.84% $1.29 $3.6B -
What do Analysts Say About SSD or UFPI?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $199.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.49%. On the other hand UFP Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $109.40 which suggests that it could grow by 17.85%. Given that UFP Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc., analysts believe UFP Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.1 1 0 UFPIUFP Industries, Inc.2 3 0 -
Is SSD or UFPI More Risky?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UFP Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.488, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.756%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSD or UFPI?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. UFP Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. pays 14.6% of its earnings as a dividend. UFP Industries, Inc. pays out 19.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSD or UFPI?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $623.5M, which are smaller than UFP Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net income of $107.4M is higher than UFP Industries, Inc.'s net income of $72.7M. Notably, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while UFP Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 17.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is 3.03x versus 0.84x for UFP Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.3.03x 20.34x $623.5M $107.4M UFPIUFP Industries, Inc.0.84x 17.33x $1.6B $72.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SSD or XPL?
Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of 17.23% compared to Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net margin of --. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 18.2% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.46.39% $2.58 $2.5B XPLSolitario Resources Corp.-- -$0.02 $24.8M -
What do Analysts Say About SSD or XPL?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $199.00, signalling upside risk potential of 16.49%. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 117.08%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.1 1 0 XPLSolitario Resources Corp.2 0 0 -
Is SSD or XPL More Risky?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.921% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.440, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.966%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SSD or XPL?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.68%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. pays 14.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SSD or XPL?
Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $623.5M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s net income of $107.4M is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.34x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Simpson Manufacturing Co., Inc. is 3.03x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SSDSimpson Manufacturing Co., Inc.3.03x 20.34x $623.5M $107.4M XPLSolitario Resources Corp.-- -- -- -$1.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is SentinelOne Stock Undervalued?
Cybersecurity major SentinelOne (NYSE:S) has struggled over several years, delivering…
Is Broadcom Stock on Sale?
Chip and software maker Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) has been among the…
Stock Ideas
Buy
59
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Buy
55
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Buy
72
GLTO alert for Dec 29
Galecto, Inc. [GLTO] is down 12.13% over the past day.
Sell
20
SMX alert for Dec 29
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is down 27.67% over the past day.
Sell
11
CDNAF alert for Dec 29
Canadian Tire Corp. Ltd. [CDNAF] is up 11.94% over the past day.
