SLGN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Holdings has a net margin of 4.64% compared to Silgan Holdings's net margin of 6.69%. Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 14.52% beat Crown Holdings's return on equity of 17.91%.

Silgan Holdings has a consensus price target of $60.24, signalling upside risk potential of 11.45%. On the other hand Crown Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $112.88 which suggests that it could grow by 16.25%. Given that Crown Holdings has higher upside potential than Silgan Holdings, analysts believe Crown Holdings is more attractive than Silgan Holdings.

Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.256% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Holdings has a beta of 0.764, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.58%.

Silgan Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Crown Holdings offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Silgan Holdings pays 29.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Holdings pays out 28.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Crown Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Silgan Holdings's net income of $68M is lower than Crown Holdings's net income of $193M. Notably, Silgan Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.01x while Crown Holdings's PE ratio is 20.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silgan Holdings is 0.96x versus 0.97x for Crown Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cavco Industries has a net margin of 4.64% compared to Silgan Holdings's net margin of 10.82%. Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 14.52% beat Cavco Industries's return on equity of 16.28%.

Silgan Holdings has a consensus price target of $60.24, signalling upside risk potential of 11.45%. On the other hand Cavco Industries has an analysts' consensus of $548.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.78%. Given that Silgan Holdings has higher upside potential than Cavco Industries, analysts believe Silgan Holdings is more attractive than Cavco Industries.

Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.256% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cavco Industries has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.665%.

Silgan Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Cavco Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Silgan Holdings pays 29.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Cavco Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Cavco Industries quarterly revenues of $522M. Silgan Holdings's net income of $68M is higher than Cavco Industries's net income of $56.5M. Notably, Silgan Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.01x while Cavco Industries's PE ratio is 25.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silgan Holdings is 0.96x versus 2.24x for Cavco Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 4.64% compared to Silgan Holdings's net margin of --. Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 14.52% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Silgan Holdings has a consensus price target of $60.24, signalling upside risk potential of 11.45%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Silgan Holdings has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Silgan Holdings is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.256% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Silgan Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Silgan Holdings pays 29.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Silgan Holdings's net income of $68M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Silgan Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.01x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silgan Holdings is 0.96x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of 4.64% compared to Silgan Holdings's net margin of -46.97%. Silgan Holdings's return on equity of 14.52% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Silgan Holdings has a consensus price target of $60.24, signalling upside risk potential of 11.45%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 603.94%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Silgan Holdings, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Silgan Holdings.

Silgan Holdings has a beta of 0.737, which suggesting that the stock is 26.256% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.191, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.9%.

Silgan Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Silgan Holdings pays 29.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silgan Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Silgan Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Silgan Holdings's net income of $68M is higher than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Silgan Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.01x while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silgan Holdings is 0.96x versus 1.29x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.