REYN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Funko, Inc. has a net margin of 8.49% compared to Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s net margin of 0.38%. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.26% beat Funko, Inc.'s return on equity of -32.9%.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.15%. On the other hand Funko, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 20.74%. Given that Funko, Inc. has higher upside potential than Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc., analysts believe Funko, Inc. is more attractive than Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc..

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, which suggesting that the stock is 44.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Funko, Inc. has a beta of 0.589, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.11%.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Funko, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Funko, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. quarterly revenues are $931M, which are larger than Funko, Inc. quarterly revenues of $250.9M. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s net income of $79M is higher than Funko, Inc.'s net income of $948K. Notably, Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.13x while Funko, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. is 1.32x versus 0.20x for Funko, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hasbro, Inc. has a net margin of 8.49% compared to Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s net margin of 16.86%. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.26% beat Hasbro, Inc.'s return on equity of -62.31%.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.15%. On the other hand Hasbro, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $91.54 which suggests that it could grow by 10.88%. Given that Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hasbro, Inc., analysts believe Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. is more attractive than Hasbro, Inc..

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, which suggesting that the stock is 44.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro, Inc. has a beta of 0.551, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.879%.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Hasbro, Inc. offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro, Inc. pays out 76.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. quarterly revenues are $931M, which are smaller than Hasbro, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s net income of $79M is lower than Hasbro, Inc.'s net income of $233.9M. Notably, Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.13x while Hasbro, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. is 1.32x versus 2.67x for Hasbro, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JAKKS Pacific, Inc. has a net margin of 8.49% compared to Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s net margin of 9.42%. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.26% beat JAKKS Pacific, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.49%.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.15%. On the other hand JAKKS Pacific, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $28.50 which suggests that it could grow by 69.95%. Given that JAKKS Pacific, Inc. has higher upside potential than Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc., analysts believe JAKKS Pacific, Inc. is more attractive than Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc..

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, which suggesting that the stock is 44.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JAKKS Pacific, Inc. has a beta of 1.470, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.003%.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. JAKKS Pacific, Inc. offers a yield of 5.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. JAKKS Pacific, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. quarterly revenues are $931M, which are larger than JAKKS Pacific, Inc. quarterly revenues of $211.2M. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s net income of $79M is higher than JAKKS Pacific, Inc.'s net income of $19.9M. Notably, Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.13x while JAKKS Pacific, Inc.'s PE ratio is 34.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. is 1.32x versus 0.33x for JAKKS Pacific, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kontoor Brands, Inc. has a net margin of 8.49% compared to Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s net margin of 4.33%. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.26% beat Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s return on equity of 49.21%.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a consensus price target of $27.75, signalling upside risk potential of 19.15%. On the other hand Kontoor Brands, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $90.75 which suggests that it could grow by 44.28%. Given that Kontoor Brands, Inc. has higher upside potential than Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc., analysts believe Kontoor Brands, Inc. is more attractive than Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc..

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, which suggesting that the stock is 44.52% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kontoor Brands, Inc. has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.74%.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.95%. Kontoor Brands, Inc. offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands, Inc. pays out 46.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. quarterly revenues are $931M, which are larger than Kontoor Brands, Inc. quarterly revenues of $853.1M. Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s net income of $79M is higher than Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s net income of $36.9M. Notably, Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.13x while Kontoor Brands, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. is 1.32x versus 1.24x for Kontoor Brands, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.